Educating the Confused – Orly’s illogical ‘logic’

Orly is excited because she ‘argued’ in a draft ‘letter’ that Judge Moore could forward under 18 USC 3332, the information to a Grand Jury and all would be well. Typically, when Orly files a draft, people refrain from commenting until she has submitted, email, mailed or otherwise distributed the document. Orly however has taken strength from the ‘fact’ that she ‘knows’ that ‘Obama’s Personal Attorney’ tracks Orly’s follies on her Blog (who is Fussy btw?) and presumes that therefore, if Orly writes something which is poorly informed, that Tepper or others would properly educate her. Now I am pleased to hear that Orly recognizes the wisdom of the many Obots both those with and without (me included) formal legal training who have managed to successfully predict the outcome of all her cases, and that she is therefore looking for some help in her legal ‘arguments’.

Obama’s personal attorney Scott J. Tepper stated during phone conference to Judge Wingate in MS, in Taitz et al v Democratic Party, Obama, Pelosi, Onaka, Fussy [sic], Astrue  that he reads Taitz website daily. Taitz  knew that if she is mistaken and there is a precedent stating that the Supreme Court judge of the state court cannot forward evidence of a crime to the federal Grand Jury, Obama’s attorneys will find this precedent and will post it on one of their blogs.

Orly’s draft letter to AL Supreme Court Justice Moore

When the law fails, it’s time for flattery [Warning: Link to Orly’s blog, click at your own risk]… In a draft letter to Judge Moore she ‘observes’ that

Orly: I read your brilliant analysis in McInnish v Chapman, a case relating to Barack Obama’s run for the U.S. President while using a fabricated birth certificate.

Orly insists, without much legal supporting evidence that under 18 USC 3332, any judge may forward information to a grand jury. In fact the only legal cases she does reference have no relevance to the issue, but are meant to remind Moore of what a Federal Judge did when he forced Moore to remove a religious statue.

What Orly, and others, may have failed to realize is that there are two statutes under which a grand jury may be convened and these grand juries are very different beasts.

Orly totally clueless

Orly write on her site:

9th Circuit included Lindsey case in its’February 13th oral argument docket. In Lindsey the district court confirmed that a candidate who is not eligible should be thrown off the ballot, while in Grinols the same district ruled the opposite. This is flagrant discrimination and bias in favor of the establishment candidate Obama

Posted on | January 20, 2014 | No Comments

Both Lindsey case and my case Grinols et al v Electoral college, Obama, Congress, secretary of State of CA, Governor of CA are now before the 9th Circuit.In Lindsey the Eastern District of Ca confirmed decision of the Se of State to throw of the ballot Peta Lindsey who was not Constitutional y eligible, but the same District refused to take action against Obama, who is even less eligible than Lindsey. Lindsey might not be 355 y.o., but she at least has papers. Obama does not have any papers verifying his identification.

9th Circuit is in catch 22. This is a clear discrimination. I believe that this discrimination in 2 similar cases will reach both the supreme Court and the Interamerican court for Human rights.

Orly has no grasp of reality here, which is that the two cases are clearly distinguishable. But I doubt that Orly understands these subtleties of law. Any first year law student would have no trouble, explaining the differences between these to cases.

And no neither the Supreme Court nor the Interamerican court of Human rights will ever hear this foolish argument.

Has Orly really passed the California Bar, I wonder… She appears to have forgotten so many of the basic.s

MD – Taitz v Colvin – Orly pretty confused

Orly has been making some pretty outrageous claims about the Maryland case. The Defendant is asking for additional time because the attorney on the case is retiring. Orly immediately raises the rhetoric but fails to understand the Judge’s past ruling

01/13/2014 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint by Carolyn Colvin Responses due by 1/30/2014 (Loucks, Allen) (Entered: 01/13/2014)

View this document on Scribd

Orly ‘claims’ that

Department of Justice [sic] is asking Judge Hollander for additional time yet again to make up a third story about the fraud of the century. See pleadings below. When one tells the truth, it is the same story all the time. When one lies, he has to make up new stories every time he is caught in another lie.

All the Department of Justice did was to ask for additional time to respond to Orly’s claim that the search was incomplete. There is no new story, there are no lies.

It was proven time and again that the Social Security administration is hiding the application for a Social Security number REDACTED, which was assigned to Harry Bounel and later fraudulently used by Obama.

Orly’s poor reading abilities may have caused her to believe that there is such an application but the facts so far show that there are no such records found. Orly is accusing the Justice Department of lying but all she has is a failed understanding of what was found.

Obama failed E-verify and SSNVS and was rejected by the Obamacare, as they also could not verify his identy.

From this Orly jumps to a conclusion that somehow Obama is using someone else’s SSN, even though there is no supporting evidence. The failure in e-verify never suggested that President Obama was not using valid SSN.

Now a new attorney was brought to handle this case and he is telling the judge that they will submit a third version of the story.

That is not what the motion states.

Current attorney was an acting US Attorney for Maryland with a staff of 70 attorneys and 70 support staff. They want additional time until February 7. These people should be fighting the fraud in the White House, instead all of these resources are used to fight one civil rights attorney, who is trying to restore the sanity, rule of law in the White House and stop usurpation of the presidency.

Orly may believe that she is a ‘civil rights’ attorney or trying to restore sanity and rule of law, but there is not much to support her position here.

So far Judge Ellen Hollander was the only judge (federal or state) who showed some decency and integrity and common sense and denied the prior motion to dismiss by the Feds

No Orly, she denied your motion for summary judgment and approved the motion to dismiss. Hint: Plaintiff is Orly, defendant is the acting Commissioner of Social Security.

12/13/2013 19 ORDER granting Defendant’s 7 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice and with leave to amend; denying Plaintiff’s 9 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice; setting deadline for Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge Ellen L. Hollander on 12/13/13. (dass, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 12/16/13) (Entered: 12/16/2013)

How clueless can one be? And really, who is “lying” here? A fascinating mindset, to say the least.

Orly’s reading abilities are quite poor, her legal successes are of similar quality and quantity.

The Court explained in its ruling in details, the failures by Orly

One of her biggest failures is the flawed belief that President Obama’s SSN was stolen and that it belonged to Harrison J Bounel.

So be prepared for months of more entertainment.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 6

Orly managed to have her case removed to the Federal Circuit after she filed an attempted RICO suit. Of course, now she is on the hook to actually file a RICO statement

04/25/2012 2 RICO Notice – The Plaintiffs shall file within twenty (20) days a RICO case statement. This statement shall include the facts the Plaintiff is relying upon to initiate this RICO complaint as a result of the “reasonable inquiry” required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. (ND) (Entered: 04/25/2012)

View this document on Scribd

The other defendant is quick to move as well and both parties file their answers to the first amended complaint.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 5

Orly, perhaps unaware of what she will set in motion, files a first amended complaint on April 19, 2012

She continues to ask for declaratory and injunctive relief and adds triple damages for RICO…

She adds Brian Fedorka, Leah Lax, Laurie Roth and Tom MacLaren as plaintiffs and  extends the list of plaintiffs to include President Obama, “Obama for America”, Loretta Fuddy, Alvin Onaka, Michael Astrue (Commissioner of Social Security), Nanci Pelosi (chair of the National Democratic Party nominating convention) and many John and Jane Does.

In typical Orly-esque fashion she still does not file a RICO statement. She now has tripped the legal trap that she had set herself…

View this document on Scribd

5 days after Orly set in motion the clock, the Secretary of State of Mississippi files a removal notice with the US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. By adding RICO, Orly has opened up a pandora box as the defendants now have the opportunity to remove the case from State Court to Federal Court. Let the fun times begin…

04/24/2012 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Secretary of State of Mississippi from Circuit Court of Hinds County, Ms, case number 251-12-107 CIV. (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 34643015410)Pursuant to Rule L.U.Civ.R. 5(b): within 14 days removing party must electronically file the entire state court record as a single filing; and all parties shall, within fourteen days after the Case Management Conference, file as separate docket items any unresolved motions that were filed in state court which they wish to advance. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A – First Amended Complaint, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ND) (Entered: 04/25/2012)

View this document on Scribd

Orly ‘Despicable Me’

Orly still cannot read

Judge Oki-Mollway orders to file a new claim with a new filing fee of $400.

She did not order you to do so, but rather rejected your attempt to change the nature of your original filing. There is no hope for your new complaint.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 4

In Part 1-3, we described Orly’s struggles to get the case properly set in motion. Finally, the Judge issues an order for a hearing.

On March 26, 2012, Judge Coleman issues an order setting a hearing for April 16, 2012

View this document on Scribd

On or around March 27, 2012, Orly sends a letter to Zullo and to Arpaio, claiming that this is a notice to appear as a witness at the April 16, 2012 hearing. Orly makes no attempt to get the court to issue an order or properly file the required documents that could have been used. So, it should not come as a surprise that neither one showed any interests.

On March 30, 2012, the Democratic Party of MS submits an application for admission of counsel pro hac vice for Scott J. Tepper. Mr Tepper is well versed in Orly’s methods and arguments. It’s fascinating to see Mr Begley understands how to properly file for an admission Pro Hac Vice.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 3

In part 1 and 2 we learned how Orly’s decision to file a RICO complained played directly into the cards of the defendants.

Begley and Tepper are quick to go for the jugular and file a motion in limine asking the court to allow them to cross examine Orly about her financial dealings since it is against the law in Mississippi for someone to be involved in champerty, maintenance and barratry, making it a crime to solicit, request or donate any money or other things of value or any other assistance, as an inducement to any person to commence or prosecute any proceedings in a MS court. Furthermore, they observe that a plaintiff in MS may not frivolously file cases when such issues have already denied such claims, especially against the party. In Orly’s case there is sufficient precedent, created by herself, that places her in the middle of sanction territory.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 2

In part 1 we explored Taitz’s early failures in filing for summons, as well as perfecting service. We now arrive at March 7, 2012 when the Democrat (sic) Party of MS files a motion to dismiss and a motion for sanctions.

1. Orly is not a qualified elector of the State of MS and thus lacks standing.
2. Orly lacks general standing
3. President Obama is a natural born citizen
4. The SOS of MS nor the Democrat Party have a statutory duty to determine candidate qualifications
5. State courts lack jurisdiction over presidential candidates
6. Complaint is time-barred under the election code. She filed her petition with the Democratic Party on Jan 8, 2012 and should have filed it within 10 days after the qualification deadline which was Jan 14, 2012. The Democratic Party then has 10 days to rule on the petition and Orly has 15 days to file a complaint with the court. Orly did not file her petition until Feb 14, outside the 15 day window.
7. The court should award sanctions against Orly under 11-55-5 and Rule 1 of the MS Rules of Civil Procedure.

Taitz in Mississippi Burning Part 1

The title references the movie Mississippi Burning which describes the disappearance of civil right workers in Mississippi. In this case, I use it to describe the disappearance of Orly’s MS State Court filing into the Federal system because of her legal failures and the evolution of the Federal case in which Orly desperately tries to file a RICO case, properly serve the parties and is now facing various possible avenues of sanctions. It’s a sordid story of failures.

So let’s start with the State Case which was filed in Miss. Hinds Cty. Cir. Ct. on Feb. 14, 2012. Orly, as the sole plaintiff, filed a petition for injunctive and declaratory against the Democrat (sic) Party and the Secretary of State relief to have President Obama be removed as a presidential candidate from the Mississippi Ballot because of fraud and to have the court declare President Obama ineligible.

MS – Orly v Democrat Party

At the Fogbow, AnitaMaria has annotated the docket so that anyone can explore the full extent of Orly’s legal follies.

View this document on Scribd

 

 

Orly and failed reading comprehension

Orly posted the following embarrassing posting about one of her cases in which she lost, again, to an empty chair. She appears to be unable to parse the meaning of ‘recover cost’…

Wow…

Dr Conspiracy quickly corrected her mistake and Orly pulled the embarrassing posting but luckily Dr C had captured the above screenshot…

Dr C explains:

The article on the Taitz site is gone this morning. I think the importance of retaining my article is not to leave a monument to how clueless Orly Taitz is, but rather to give a possible example of the kind of error she makes that contributes to her being the conspiracy theorist she is—the lack of a high-functioning nonsense filter. Orly Taitz expressed surprise that she should lose her case and the other side have to pay costs—recognizing something that makes no sense whatever; nevertheless, the way her mind works, that recognition of nonsense was not strong enough to effect a change in behavior and to  prevent an embarrassing mistake.

Orly continues to exhibit poor reading and comprehension skills (note that English is not her native tongue), leading to many embarrassing moments.

Quite educational…

Follow up: Orly also embarrasses herself on Facebook

Orly clowning around with FOIA

Second FOIA request for information sent to Dori Salcedo, Chief FOIA officer of Department of Health and Human Services. HHS is obligated to respond by January 27, 2014 and provide information whether Obama is indeed enrolled in spite of his use of a stolen SSN and what safeguards were placed by Sebelius and HHS to prevent illegal aliens and others from enrolling in ACA (Obamacare) while using stolen and fabricated Social Security numbers

She is asking for a published document and for data which are exempt from FOIA. What a fail… And she still cannot send it to the correct address.

Really, Orly sends off 100+ pages of drivel but fails to make anything that seems to be relevant to FOIA.

Par for the course… That’s why we love her as she manages to misdirect and keep the birthers busy doing nothing. Soros would be proud.

HI – Taitz v. Hawai’ian Memorial Park Mortuary – Order to show cause

Orly is getting ready for another legal slap down…

Predictable… The judge wants Orly to explain why she has standing in this matter. Another failure by Orly… She cannot even properly file a case. It’s either lack of standing, lack of proper service that seems to get her most of the times.

6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED – Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/23/13. Show Cause Response due by 1/10/2014. “Taitz may respond to this order to show cause in writing no later than January 10, 20 14. If the court receives no response by the deadline, the case will be automatically dismissed. Taitz may, of course, “moot out” this order to show cause by voluntarily dismissing the Complaint. If the court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction, no further order regarding the motion seeking injunctive relief will issue.

Is birtherism dead? Taitz moving on ?

Even Orly appears to have abandoned her foolish attempts and is now moving to file cases in which judges applied our Constitution when ruling in favor of same sex marriage.

While she does not appear to understand our Constitution (she is from Moldavia after all), she more foolishly believes that she can somehow sue in Utah and Colorado, and worse, that she can sue federal judges. She is so clueless. Her latest filing in Colorado fails to even get close to standing. Worse, she is not even filing as a pro-se and thus needs to be admitted for practice in Colorado before she could proceed.

I am not sure why she wants to deny same sex couples the same Constitutional rights extended to others, but she does seem to have grown tired of her continued failures in pursuing her follies against President Obama. Needless to say, she will be equally effective in her new venture as she has been in most anything she has done.

There is a God after all 😉

Orly– hitting a new low.

Press Release: Mortuary director Virginia Donato states that the family refuses to confirm that the body of Loretta Fuddy will not be cremated on Saturday. Emergency petition for a stay/preliminary injunction of cremation was filed with the US District Court in Honolulu

Orly totally has lost total sense of reason and decency…And she has the gall to ask for donations… Have the continuous failures finally caused her to ‘snap’?

Of course, given Orly’s legal failures, I have no doubt that by the time she sorts out how to properly file such an injunction, it will be late 2014…

Orly used to be entertaining in his inabilities to deal with legal issues, and her legal failures, however her latest antics have become totally indecent and I hope that Dr Fuddy’s family sues Orly for intentional infliction of emotional distress…

Educating the Confused – TN Grand Jury

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=441363

Shocking admission: Jury foreman in TN is not a juror randomely selected from the pool of jurors, but a government puppet, which was appointed by the regime. so, not only we have judges that are influenced by the regime, we also have juries that are influenced by the regime through the appointed foremen. Total deprivation of rights

Posted on | November 28, 2013 | No Comments

Rigged: CDR Fitzpatrick Vindicated; Grand Jury Tampering & Judicial Misconduct

Blockbuster Exclusive: State of Tennessee: Grand Jury Foremen Are Not Jurors! IN CONTRADICT

Honestly?… How long did it take these geniuses to figure out that which courts have already ruled? Rondeau, Orly, Fitzpatrick are all clueless…

Orly’s ‘happy thanksgiving’

Orly is unhappy again because the judges are so mean to her..

Judge Lamberth pardons Indonesian-Kenyan turkey without 1 word of explanation. As usual Judge Lamberth picks a holiday to give a present to Obama and stick it to every american

Nope, just to you Orly, just to you. You filed a 60B2 motion untimely, even though you tried to turn it into a 60B6 motion, the judge clearly understood what you were trying to do.

Happy thanksgiving Orly…

Oh and Orly… Keep up your good work and perfect record…

Oh and that request for a Vaughn Index? Hilarious… You really cannot read, can you?

MS – Taitz v Democrat Party – Orly responds… sorta

2013-07-19 – Taitz v DPM, et al. – Taitz Corrected Response to Judge Wingate

Mark at the Fogbow responds to Orly’s response to Begley et al filing a notice that she had failed in Grinols v Electoral College. Orly somehow forgot that Judge England distinguished Grinols from Lindsey, which is really not that hard to do. She has filed an appeal with the 9th Circuit Court and is trying to have the two cases merged but they are quite unrelated… But Orly’s  response is totally outrageous and may attract the attention of the Court…

Orly replied:

“Currently both Lindsey and Grinols cases are being heard by the 9th Circuit, as the rulings are diametrically opposite and attorneys for the defense acted unethically by not providing the judge Lindsey decision. Attorneys for Obama and the Democratic Party of MS in the case at hand Sam Begley and Scott J. Tepper are flagrantly violating professional ethics by providing Hon. Judge Wingate with Grinols opinion while hiding from him Lindsey opinion, for which they should be sanctioned.”

Apparently Orly ignored footnote 7 from Judge Englund’s opinion:

“At the hearing, Plaintiffs relied heavily on a recently decided Eastern District of California case, Peace and Freedom Party v. Bowen. Although Plaintiffs discussed the case at the MTD hearing, Plaintiffs failed to include it in any of their filings. Neither California Defendants nor Federal Defendants could discuss the case as they learned about it on the spot. Moreover, even though Peace and Freedom Party has no precedential weight by this Court, the Court finds it distinguishable from the present action.”