Poor Judy does not understand that default is not automatic, and that since he failed to state a claim upon which he may be granted relief.
In response, Judy filed a motion for rehearing “en Blanc”… I kid you not… A petition for rehearing en Banc asks the full court to render judgment. Given the frivolous nature of the case, this will not go anywhere.
I may have missed reporting on this one. Orly had raised some incredible arguments and the Appeal’s Court responded ‘kindly’ after the State had declined to even respond… Orly at her best and worst.
Orly Taitz appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging denying Taitz’s motion to reconsider; and denying her motion to reopen and recuse. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-01878-ELH (D. Md. May 13, 2014; June 13, 2014; July 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Terry has decided to file some documents, even though it is not clear if he has been qualified to proceed ‘pro se’ or is filing through a lawyer. A real lawyer would not likely have been willing to file these documents.
ACTION DATE TEXT
11/25/2014 OBJECTION WITH MOTION TO DISMISS
11/25/2014 DEMAND FOR QUALIFYING DOCUMENTS-HANKINSON
11/25/2014 DEMAND FOR QUALIFYING DOCUMENTS-MEGGS
11/25/2014 OBJECTION-NOT GUILTY PLEA
11/24/2014 DEMAND FOR BILL OF MORE SPECIFIC PARTICULARS AND
MEMORANDA OF LAW IN SUPPORT THEREOF
11/24/2014 OBJECTION-DEMAND FOR ACCUSED TO HIRE ATTORNEY
Terry desperately needs a lawyer in order to explain to him the rules. The Judge is protecting Terry’s due process rights to be represented by a lawyer, until a proper hearing has been performed. Terry should have filed a motion for a ‘Faretta’ hearing to determine if he is allowed to be ‘pro se’.
The demand for bill of particulars etc, will be given to Terry once he 1) has a lawyer 2) or he has been allowed to proceed ‘pro se’.
The object to the ‘not guilty’ plea is a strange request. Terry may be objecting to the Judge having entered a ‘not guilty’ plea during the arraignment, since Terry failed to appear with a lawyer and was not properly vetted to proceed ‘pro se’. The Judge again, is protecting Terry’s due process rights.
The demands for qualifying documents is pure ‘sovCit’ and likely involves a request for oath and bond. What a waste of the Court’s time.
As to the ‘object with motion to dismiss’, that motion will not be considered until Terry’s Faretta hearing has been concluded, and it may have to be refiled by a real lawyer, who may not be willing to file it, as it may very well be another SovCit filing.
For a more complete explanation, read Paul Lentz’s posting that the Fogbow
A hilarious interview with ‘Sheriff’ Arpaio who is trying to defend his claims that the birth certificate is fraudulent but is unwilling to reveal why his investigations are not done, citing “on-going investigation”. And yet, he is willing to already make the claim of ‘fraudulent’.
What a joker, and those people who believe that there is any evidence for ‘probable cause’ need to realize that the work of his so-called ‘experts’ has been largely debunked. And nobody really cares about Arpaio’s ‘investigations’ anymore.
Von NotHaus, who will be sentenced next month, had argued that federal laws prohibiting counterfeit currency were unconstitutional, and he said prosecutors didn’t present enough evidence to prove he intended to violate those laws.
“When the people own the money, they control the government,” von NotHaus said in 1999. “When the government owns the money, it controls the people.”
The judge dismissed his arguments that anti-counterfeit laws infringed the public’s right to privately barter, and von NotHaus’ claims it was not illegal to compete with the Federal Reserve.
No travel outside Carolina without permission, no visits to DC unless for Court visits, active GPS monitoring, Rod must pay monthly fees, list of weapons to be declared within 24 hours. Rod relinquishes all claims to weapons that were confiscated. They will drop failure to appear charge, jail time 0-6 months, fine $500-$5000. A criminal conviction may also prohibit Rod from owning firearms.
11/21/2014 Minute Entry; for proceedings held before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts: Plea Agreement Hearing as to RODNEY CLASS held on 11/21/2014. REFERRAL TO PROBATION OFFICE for Presentence Investigation as to RODNEY CLASS. Sentencing Memoranda/Motions due by 1/30/2015. Sentencing set for 2/9/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts. Bond Status of Defendant: Personal Recognizance with Electronic Monitoring; Court Reporter: William Zaremba; Defense Attorney: PRO SE/A.J. Kramer; US Attorney: Jeffrey Pearlman; Pretrial Officer: Vaugh Wilson; (hs) Modified on 11/24/2014 (hs). (Entered: 11/24/2014)
11/21/2014 CORRECTED***Minute Entry for proceedings held before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts: Plea Agreement Hearing as to RODNEY CLASS held on 11/21/2014, Guilty Plea entered as to Count 1s., REFERRAL TO PROBATION OFFICE for Presentence investigation. Sentencing Memoranda/Motions due by 1/30/2015. Release Order issued. Sentencing set for 2/9/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts. Bond Status of Defendant: Personal Recognizance with Electronic Monitoring; Court Reporter: William Zaremba Defense Attorney: PRO Se/A.J. Kramer standby counsel; US Attorney: Jeffrey Pearlman; Pretrial Officer: Vaughn Wilson; (hs) (Entered: 11/24/2014)
11/21/2014 167 WAIVER of Right to Trial by Jury as to RODNEY CLASS, Approved by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 11/21/2014. (hs) (Entered: 11/24/2014)
11/21/2014 169 PLEA AGREEMENT as to RODNEY CLASS (hs) (Entered: 11/24/2014)
11/21/2014 170 ORDER; Setting Conditions of Release as to RODNEY CLASS: Personal Recognizance/Electronic Monitoring, Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 11/21/2014. (hs) (Entered: 11/24/2014)
11/17/2014 166 LEAVE TO FILE DENIED – Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus submitted by Dwight Class, non-party, as to RODNEY CLASS. “Leave for non-party to file petition DENIED,” signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 11/13/14. This document is unavailable as the Court denied its filing. (A copy of the front page of the document mailed to RODNEY CLASS and Dwight Class.)(mlp) (Entered: 11/17/2014)