FL – State v Trussell – Sovcit filings

Terry has decided to file some documents, even though it is not clear if he has been qualified to proceed ‘pro se’ or is filing through a lawyer. A real lawyer would not likely have been willing to file these documents.

ACTION DATE                            TEXT
11/25/2014                      OBJECTION WITH MOTION TO DISMISS
11/25/2014                      DEMAND FOR QUALIFYING DOCUMENTS-MEGGS
11/25/2014                      OBJECTION-NOT GUILTY PLEA

Terry desperately needs a lawyer in order to explain to him the rules. The Judge is protecting Terry’s due process rights to be represented by a lawyer, until a proper hearing has been performed. Terry should have filed a motion for a ‘Faretta’ hearing to determine if he is allowed to be ‘pro se’.

The demand for bill of particulars etc, will be given to Terry once he 1) has a lawyer 2) or he has been allowed to proceed ‘pro se’.

The object to the ‘not guilty’ plea is a strange request. Terry may be objecting to the Judge having entered a ‘not guilty’ plea during the arraignment, since Terry failed to appear with a lawyer and was not properly vetted to proceed ‘pro se’. The Judge again, is protecting Terry’s due process rights.

The demands for qualifying documents is pure ‘sovCit’ and likely involves a request for oath and bond. What a waste of the Court’s time.

As to the ‘object with motion to dismiss’, that motion will not be considered until Terry’s Faretta hearing has been concluded, and it may have to be refiled by a real lawyer, who may not be willing to file it, as it may very well be another SovCit filing.

For a more complete explanation, read Paul Lentz’s posting that the Fogbow


FL – Terry Trussell – Struggling with the reality

At “Patriots for America” (sic), the comments show a significant confusion about what happened and why the magic incantations failed. Some have contacted the Dixie County Board of Commissioners, others are struggling to interpret how the judge could have ruled Trussell’s presence in the court as a “failure to appear”, even though the audio clearly shows that the Judge questioned Trussell who avoided answering the question in the affirmative.

This is good – I think. I hope this Dixie County board does something to step in here and stop this political terrorism.
A question that comes to my mind is that if the judge claims that Terry George Trussell (the subservient slave under this justice system) was NOT in court and thus “failed to appear”,,,,how could they walk six feet across the court room and arrest the MAN Terry Trussell,,, the one who “Failed to Appear”?


Continue reading

FL – Terry Trussell – Arraignment

Non-verified rumor:

Boots on the ground have reported that Terry’s bond was revoked after he announced he was present, in corporate and in man. It’s very likely that the Judge did not want to play Sovcit games and ruled that he had failed to appear and revoked his bond.

So much for trying to avoid justice…

Let’s see if there are updates on the web…

More and more details are emerging which suggest that Terry went full Sovcit on the court

“Patriots for America” reports that:

Terry Trussell appeared in front of Judge Hankinson’s Kangaroo court for arraignment this morning at the Dixie County Court House.  When called by the Judge Hankinson Mr. Trussell responded “I’m here to address this matter.” Judge  Hankinson refused to recognize him because he was in the audience, not before the bar,  declared he failed to appear in court and  said he was issuing  a bench warrant for failure to appear. The judge fled the court declaring it in recess having the person he said “failed to appear in court” arrested on the spot.
Quick to call a real court a Kangaroo court, they do report that Terry refused to appear before the court. Poor Terry continues to dig himself deeper and deeper.
What a mess of his own creation and the Judge is not taking any nonsense.