Terry and his friends

Now that Terry finally has filed a standard Habeas Corpus, his friends have decided to ‘up the ante’ and send a ‘Writ of Mandamus’ ‘ordering’ the court to take certain action.

10/29/2014 6  FIRST AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL. (No service copies) (jws) (Entered: 10/29/2014)

10/29/2014   ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES notified that action is needed Re: Petitioner’s 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (No service copies) (jws) (Entered: 10/29/2014)

Is Terry set up to be the ‘fall guy’ for the follies of the so called ‘common law grand jury’?

Since the Common Law Grand Jury lacks any jurisdiction or statutory foundation, the judge will simply ignore the document. Let’s hope the judge will explore the option to prosecute the offenders for similar charges to those of Terry’s.

YOU ARE NOW HEREBY ORDERED to Show Cause why you failed to act and do your sworn duty to dispose of the matter, while one of the People remains in prison without due process of law protected under the Fifth Amendment.

Source: “Mandamus

Such a funny knitting club pretending that they hold any authority over the court. Their failures will continue to result in the courts ignoring these ‘petitions for redress’.

Rodney Class – Arrest

What a dummy, failure to show up in court, now being arrested. This may add some time to his sentence.

10/29/2014 159  ORDER; directing FORTHWITH transport to this jurisdiction as to RODNEY CLASS, Signed by Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts on 10/29/2014. (hs) (Entered: 10/29/2014)


As defendant Rodney Class has now been arrested in North Carolina on the bench warrant issued by this Court on Monday, October 27, 2014 for his failure to appear in this Court as required, it is hereby
ORDERED that the United States Marshal transport defendant Rodney Class FORTHWITH to appear in this district for further proceedings in this case.

SIGNED this 29th day of October, 2014.

/s/ Richard W. Roberts, Chief Judge

Rodney Class – Bench Warrant Issued

10/27/2014   Minute Entry; for proceedings held before Chief Judge Richard W. Roberts: Status Conference as to RODNEY CLASS held on 10/27/2014. Defendant failed to appear for a scheduled Motion Hearing. Oral rulings from the bench: Defendant’s Motions 20 35 91 95 96 105 130 denied. Bench Warrant issued. Bond Status of Defendant: Personal Recognizance; Court Reporter: William Zaremba; Defense Attorney: PRO SE/A.J. Kramer-Standby Counsel; US Attorney: Jeffrey Pearlman; (hs) (Entered: 10/27/2014)

ME – IRS v Messier – Docket

Contrary to claims made here, the docket does not show that the claimed stipulations stand unrebutted. I find it hard to understand why people cannot properly check the docket?

U.S. District Court
District of Maine (Portland)
Case title: USA v. MESSIER et al Date Filed: 06/18/2014

Continue reading

WA – Jimmy Ellis Clark – Jurisdiction

The hearing “judge” refused to provide evidence of her Oath of Office and its proper filing and she also usurped jurisdiction according to Clark in the post hearing conference. According to Clark, a judge that fails to prove jurisdiction upon request waives any right to immunity.


No supporting logic is provided and again, Clark seems to be making assertions of law, while failing to be able to convince the courts. The judge explicitly rejected this claim. When will Clark learn that ‘saying it’ does not ‘make it so’.

I find it fascinating that Clark files the writ of prohibition and then argues that the court lacks jurisdiction. Fascinating internal contradiction.

However, it is clear that the Judge is at a minimum a de-facto judge.


A confuser rooster –

Reply by Old Rooster16 minutes ago

Amendment V; US Constitution:

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,

[NBC: The Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury clause has not been extended to include the States who have the right to determine how to deal with a Grand Jury. In Florida, for example, Grand Juries are rarely used and an indictment by a prosecutor is in most cases sufficient.]

Has there been an indictment or a presentment presented before a Grand Jury in the case again Mr. Terry Trussell? If so – Where is it?

[NBC: Wrong question.]

This, and many other cases, are prime examples of precisely how the criminals claiming to be authorities of government confess that they are in fact criminals them selves.

[NBC: Or some amongst 'we the people' who do not understand our Constitition]

It is now Sunday October 12th, 11:25 am, to the best of this writers knowledge Mr. Terry George Trussell is being held against his will in solitary confinement in a Dixie County Florida jail.

[NBC: Most people are held against there will in Jail]

Also to the best of this writers knowledge no one has lifted a finger to help him. Is there not one individual within the National Liberty Alliance, and the movement to restore the Common Law of this Nation, who is willing and capable of standing in defense of this true American Patriot? This judge and this Florida prosecutor have clearly acted in violation of Article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. And yet not one individual has made an effort to right this injustice and free this man from this unlawful incarceration. If We-The-People are not willing to stand and demand true Justice under this Constitution then all of this movement to restore the Common Law of this land is no more than another line of useless rhetoric.

[NBC: You have got it right. The 'Common Law' restoration movement is full of useless rhetoric, in addition to being wrong about our Constitution, Common Law, and judicial procedure. It's nothing more than a 'knitting club' of like minded people who dream about the 'good old days' and are upset with today's policies.]