Contrary to claims made here, the docket does not show that the claimed stipulations stand unrebutted. I find it hard to understand why people cannot properly check the docket?
U.S. District Court
District of Maine (Portland)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cr-00083-DBH-1
|Case title: USA v. MESSIER et al||Date Filed: 06/18/2014|
The hearing “judge” refused to provide evidence of her Oath of Office and its proper filing and she also usurped jurisdiction according to Clark in the post hearing conference. According to Clark, a judge that fails to prove jurisdiction upon request waives any right to immunity.
No supporting logic is provided and again, Clark seems to be making assertions of law, while failing to be able to convince the courts. The judge explicitly rejected this claim. When will Clark learn that ‘saying it’ does not ‘make it so’.
I find it fascinating that Clark files the writ of prohibition and then argues that the court lacks jurisdiction. Fascinating internal contradiction.
However, it is clear that the Judge is at a minimum a de-facto judge.
Reply by Old Rooster16 minutes ago
Amendment V; US Constitution:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
[NBC: The Fifth Amendment's Grand Jury clause has not been extended to include the States who have the right to determine how to deal with a Grand Jury. In Florida, for example, Grand Juries are rarely used and an indictment by a prosecutor is in most cases sufficient.]
Has there been an indictment or a presentment presented before a Grand Jury in the case again Mr. Terry Trussell? If so – Where is it?
[NBC: Wrong question.]
This, and many other cases, are prime examples of precisely how the criminals claiming to be authorities of government confess that they are in fact criminals them selves.
[NBC: Or some amongst 'we the people' who do not understand our Constitition]
It is now Sunday October 12th, 11:25 am, to the best of this writers knowledge Mr. Terry George Trussell is being held against his will in solitary confinement in a Dixie County Florida jail.
[NBC: Most people are held against there will in Jail]
Also to the best of this writers knowledge no one has lifted a finger to help him. Is there not one individual within the National Liberty Alliance, and the movement to restore the Common Law of this Nation, who is willing and capable of standing in defense of this true American Patriot? This judge and this Florida prosecutor have clearly acted in violation of Article V of the Constitution of The United States of America. And yet not one individual has made an effort to right this injustice and free this man from this unlawful incarceration. If We-The-People are not willing to stand and demand true Justice under this Constitution then all of this movement to restore the Common Law of this land is no more than another line of useless rhetoric.
[NBC: You have got it right. The 'Common Law' restoration movement is full of useless rhetoric, in addition to being wrong about our Constitution, Common Law, and judicial procedure. It's nothing more than a 'knitting club' of like minded people who dream about the 'good old days' and are upset with today's policies.]
Quite funny… I do not consent. What a fool. Refusing a lawful order, escalating in what one can hope to be some real jail time.
At “Patriots for America” (sic), the comments show a significant confusion about what happened and why the magic incantations failed. Some have contacted the Dixie County Board of Commissioners, others are struggling to interpret how the judge could have ruled Trussell’s presence in the court as a “failure to appear”, even though the audio clearly shows that the Judge questioned Trussell who avoided answering the question in the affirmative.
This is good – I think. I hope this Dixie County board does something to step in here and stop this political terrorism.
A question that comes to my mind is that if the judge claims that Terry George Trussell (the subservient slave under this justice system) was NOT in court and thus “failed to appear”,,,,how could they walk six feet across the court room and arrest the MAN Terry Trussell,,, the one who “Failed to Appear”?
A persistent, but meritless myth amongst many Sovereign Citizens is that the ‘fringed’ flag in the court rooms indicates that the court is under Admiralty jurisdiction.
The American Legion explains
Fringing of the flag is neither approved of nor prohibited by the Flag Code. The American Legion considers that fringe is used as an honorable enrichment to the Flag. Additionally the courts have deemed without merit and frivolous, lawsuits that contend that the gold fringe adorning the flag conferred Admiralty/Maritime jurisdiction.
Terry Trussell Notice of Indemnification
STATE OF FLORIDA
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
FOR DIXIE COUNTY FLORIDA