Since there appear to still be people who are unwilling to comprehend the simple arguments, I will spend some more time going through the rulings in question.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEACE AND FREEDOM PARTY, PETA LINDSAY, and RICHARD BECKER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DEBRA BOWEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of State of California,
Defendant.
California Secretary of State Debra Bowen (“Defendant”) moves for an order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) dismissing with prejudice the claims filed against her by The Peace and Freedom Party, Peta Lindsay, and Richard Becker (collectively “Plaintiffs”). Plaintiffs allege that the Secretary violated their First, Fourteenth, and Twentieth Amendment constitutional rights by failing to list Peta Lindsay on the presidential primary ballot for the Peace and Freedom Party. Defendant contends Lindsay was not entitled to be placed on the ballot since she is ineligible to serve as president of the United States due to her age.
Continue reading →