American Grand Jury (TN)- Doc 1 – Leave to file Presentments Denied

And so the ‘success’ of the so called American Grand Jury continues, failing to convince the Courts

11/06/2009 1 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of certain documents identified as “Grand Jury Presentments” filed by Mack H. Ellis. The documents purport to represent grand jury presentments for fraud, treason and election fraud against President Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Convention. Leave to file this presentment is DENIED. Further, though the papers presented to the Clerk of Court shall not be filed, they shall be assigned a miscellaneous number along with this Order for the Court’s record.. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 11/6/09. (# 1 Attachment-Affidavit of Process-Serve and # 2 Attachment-Grand Jury Presentments)(as) (copy mailed to Mack Ellis) Modified on 11/6/2009 (af). (Entered: 11/06/2009)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

IN RE: AMERICAN GRAND JURY  a/k/a SUPER GRAND JURY II

JUDGE CAMPBELL

ORDER

The Court is in receipt of certain documents identified as “Grand Jury Presentments,” filed by Mack H. Ellis. The documents purport to represent grand jury presentments for fraud, treason and election fraud against President Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic National Convention.

Re: American Super Grand Jury – Doc 8 – Response to Court Order

11/03/2009 8 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER re 4[RECAP] Order, filed by AMERICAN GRAND JURY. (kb) (Entered: 11/10/2009)

11/03/2009 7 ORDER lodging Response to Court Order. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 11/3/2009. (kb) (Entered: 11/10/2009)

Fascinating non-response where they AGJ insists that the Court has to accept their presentments, and that they should not be forced to pay the filing fee. Of course the court responds by ordering that no actions shall be taken until the petitioners comply with the original order. Way to go Judge Lamberth. Funny guys those wannabe grand juries. Do they really believe that the court has to accept their ‘presentments’ which are not much different from the musings of a knitting circle?

Response to Court Order

American Grand Jury [hereinafter "AGJ"] hereby files this “Response to Court Order” before the United States District for the District of Columbia in response to the Order [hereinafter "Order"] issued by Judge Royce C. Lamberth on September 10, 2009 in re: Super American Grand Jury.

Re: Super American Grand Jury – Docket

U.S. District Court
District of Columbia (Washington, DC)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09-mc-00346-RCL

In Re SUPER AMERICAN GRAND JURY Assigned to: Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Date Filed: 07/02/2009 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions Jurisdiction: Federal Question

American Grand Jury – Motion to Reconsideration Granted, Case Dismissed

09/10/2009 4 ORDER granting 3 MOTION for Reconsideration re 2 Order of Court by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth denying leave to file presentments, by AMERICAN GRAND JURY. Petitioner’s motion for reconsideration is hereby granted and they are given leave to file their “presentments”, upon tendering the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court, however, should the fee be tendered the presentments will be dismissed as the petitioners lack standing to enforce the criminal laws of the United States. Signed by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth on 9/10/2009. (zkb, ) (Entered: 09/11/2009)