- Hawaii Orly and local supporter Ron Wong
- Kreep is looking for money again… But this time it will work…
I just got out of an incredible meeting in Honolulu. We have the chance the knock Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., off the ballot in Hawaii! His home state!
2012 ELECTIONS – CANDIDATE OBJECTIONS
NOTE: This fact sheet is for informational purposes only. Refer to Sections 11-118 and 12-8 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes and other sources of the law for information on candidate objections.
I. OBJECTION TO CANDIDATES
Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) section 12-8, states that all nomination papers filed in conformity with section 12-3, HRS, shall be deemed valid unless a written objection is made to that candidate’s nomination papers. Objections may be made by a registered voter, an officer of a political party whose name is on file with the Chief Election Officer, the Chief Election Officer, or the County Clerk in the case of a county election.
II. DEADLINE TO FILE OBJECTIONS
All objections must be filed in writing by 4:30 p.m. on the thirtieth day or the next earliest working day prior to the primary or special election. Objections by a registered voter shall be filed with the Chief Election Officer or the County Clerk (in the case of a county election). Objections by an officer of a political party shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court.
The deadline to file a candidate objection for the 2012 elections is:
4:30 p.m., Thursday, July 12, 2012
III. RECEIPT OF NOTICE OF OBJECTION
Upon receipt of a written notice of objection, the Chief Election Officer, or the County Clerk in the case of a county office, shall notify the candidate of the objection by certified or registered mail. If an officer of a political party files an objection with the Circuit Court, an officer of the political party shall notify the candidate of the objection by registered or certified mail.
IV. PRELIMINARY DECISION/DETERMINATION
The Chief Election Officer, or the County Clerk in the case of a county office, must render a preliminary decision on the merits of the objection within five working days after the objection is filed/received. Prior to making this preliminary decision, the Chief Election Officer/County Clerk may hold a meeting to gather facts.
V. COMPLAINT FILED WITH CIRCUIT COURT
If the Chief Election Officer, or the County Clerk in the case of a county office, decides that there are grounds for disqualification, the Chief Election Officer/County Clerk shall file a complaint with the Circuit Court within seven working days after the objection is filed/received.
If a political party objects to a candidate’s nomination papers because a candidate is not a member of the party pursuant to the party’s rules, an officer of the political party shall file an objection with the Circuit Court by 4:30 p.m. on the thirtieth day or the next earliest working day prior to the primary or special election.
VI. CIRCUIT COURT SUMMONS
The Circuit Court shall summon the defendant (candidate) to appear before the Court not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth (calendar) day after service of the summons.
VII. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGMENT/DECISION
The Circuit Court shall give judgment to the Chief Election Officer/County Clerk not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fourth (calendar) day from the hearing of the complaint.
If the Court’s judgment is that the candidate should not be disqualified, then the candidate is eligible to run for office.
If the Court’s judgment is to disqualify the candidate:
1. Judgment is prior to the close of candidate filing (ballots not printed):
The Chief Election Officer/County Clerk shall notify the chairperson of the political party of which the person was disqualified as the candidate. The political party may fill the vacancy if they provide the Chief Election Officer/County Clerk with the name of a replacement candidate within three (calendar) days of the vacancy.
2. Judgment is after the close of candidate filing (ballots already printed):
The Chief Election Officer/County Clerk shall notify the chairperson of the political party of which the person was disqualified as the candidate. The Chief Election Officer/County Clerk may order the candidate’s name stricken from the ballot or order that a notice of disqualification be prominently posted at the appropriate polling places on election day.
There are two ways to gain access to the State of Hawaii general election presidential ballot:
- Presidential Petition Process
- Nominee of a Qualified Political Party
A. NOTARIZED STATEMENT OF INTENT (HRS §11-113(c)(2))
B. PETITION FOR QUALIFICATION (HRS §11-113(c)(2))
NOMINEE OF A QUALIFIED POLITICAL PARTY
A. SWORN APPLICATION (HRS §11-113)
(1) In the case of candidates of political parties that have been qualified to place candidates on the primary and general election ballots, the appropriate official of those parties shall file a sworn application with the chief election officer not later than 4:30 p.m. on the sixtieth day prior to the general election, which shall include:
(A) The name and address of each of the two candidates;
(B) A statement that each candidate is legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution; and
(C) A statement that the candidates are the duly chosen candidates of both the state and the national party, giving the time, place, and manner of the selection; and
Orly is proceeding under Hawaii election laws 3-171 which are administrative rules to adopt, amend or repeal rules and she fails to outline which of the 10 or so acts of fraud President Obama is guilty of under HRS 19.3. Furthermore, she has no standing to raise issues of criminal offenses, for that we have the Attorney General. I could explain to her which statutes would be more relevant, although she would still fail but I’d love to see Orly, for once, do her own research.
PETITION UNDER HAWAII ELECTIONS LAW §3-172–3 and demand for an emergency hearing under §3-171-4 (these are rules for amending the election rules…)
COMPLAINT UNDER §19-3 ELECTIONS FRAUD – Do not really make much sense as she fails to outline which fraudulent offense President Obama is guilty of under the statute.
Petitioner is seeking an emergency hearing, under Hawaiian Revised Statutes §§3-171- 3, 3-171-4 19-3.5
Arguments” – The usual kitchen sink of assertions and accusations, non arising to real evidence.
ALLEGATIONS IN THE COMPLAINT
1.Barack Hussein Obama, II is not a natural born citizen and is not qualified to be on the ballot as a Presidential candidate. In 2008, when Mr. Obama ran for the U.S. presidency, he was never vetted and he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status. Any challenger to his eligibility, including complainant herein was mobbed with allegations of racism coming from largely left leaning pro-Obama media. We have seen an unprecedented level of corruption in all 3 branches of the U.S. government and the government of HI, which allowed Mr. Obama to get into the White House without any valid identification papers.
2. The most staggering evidence, is Mr. Obama’s lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state, where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify and SSNVS
3. Complainant herein, is Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, attorney and doctor licensed in the state of California, who is an attorney admitted to the Supreme Court of the United States, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Dr. Taitz is a civil rights leader, who is fighting an unprecedented level of corruption in the government and courts
in order to preserve an unalienable right of U.S. citizens to elect eligible candidates and vote in fraud free elections. Dr. Taitz is also a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate 2012 in the state of California.
4. In 2009 Dr. Taitz received reports from licensed investigators Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels, which show, that according to most reputable national databases for most of his life Barack Obama used a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, issued in 1977, even though he was never a resident of the state of Connecticut. In 1977, Social Security numbers were assigned according to the state where application were submitted. In 1977 Obama was nowhere near Connecticut, he was a student at the Punahoa school in Hawaii, where he resided. Additionally, national databases showed another birth date, associated with this number, a birth date of 1890. In around of 1976-1977, due to changes in Social Security administration, many elderly individuals, who never had Social Security numbers before, had to apply for their Social Security number for the first time in order to obtain Social Security benefits. It appears, that the number in question was assigned to an elderly individual in CT around March of 1977, the death of this elderly individual was never reported, and from around 1980-1981 this number was fraudulently assumed by Barack Obama. Exhibit 1, Affidavit of Susan Daniels
5. Taitz was a delegate at the Continental Congress Convention in 2009, where she had a discussion on the matter of Barack Obama’s fraudulent use of the aforementioned Connecticut Social Security number with a recently retired senior deportation officer from the department of Homeland Security, John Sampson. Mr. Sampson provided her with an affidavit, attesting to the fact, that indeed according to national databases Obama is using a Connecticut Social Security number, even though there is no reasonable justification or explanation for such use by one, who resided in Hawaii in and around the time the Social Security number in question was issued. Exhibit 2 Affidavit of John Sampson.
3. In 2010, Barack Obama posted on line on WhiteHouse.gov his 2009 tax returns. As he posted those returns, he forgot to flatten the PDF file, so all of the layers of modification of the file became visible to the public. One of the pages contained Obama’s full Social Security number 042-68-4425. Taitz received an affidavit from Adobe Illustrator program expert Chito Papa, attesting to the fact, that initially posted tax returns of Barack Obama contained Connecticut Social security number 042-68-4425. While the file was later flattened and the Social security number can no longer be seen, thousands of US citizens and individuals around the world were able to obtain the original file with the full Social Security number.
4. Taitz checked an official site for Selective Service SSS.gov. She entered name Barack Obama, date of birth 08.04.1961 (Obama’s alleged birth date) and Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which Obama is using in his tax returns. She got a verification, showing, that Barack Obama registered for Selective Service, using this CT SSN. At this point she had three investigator reports and two US government documents, showing Obama using CT SSN 042-68-4425.
5. Taitz received an affidavit from a witness Linda Jordan, who ran a E-Verify check for the above Social Security number 042-68-4425. According to E-Verify, there is no match between Obama’s name and the Social security he used in his tax returns and his Selective service application.
6. Taitz received an e-mail from a US Army officer, Colonel Gregory Hollister, whereby he did an independent check and found, that indeed Obama is using this Connecticut number 042-68-4425. He also, contacted SSNVS (Social Security Number Verification Systems) and found that the number Obama is using was never assigned to him. Exhibit 6. Additionally, there is a clear pattern of Social Security fraud by Obama’s family members and close associates. Recently Obama’s uncle Onyango Obama was arrested for drunk driving and found to be using for employment a Social Security number, even though he is an illegal alien and not allowed to work. Obama’s aunt Zeutuni Obama was stealing tax payer dollars by living in subsidized housing and using a state of Indiana- issued Social Security number, even though she is an illegal alien and was never a resident of the state of Indiana. Obama’s close associate, mentor and co-board member from Annenberg Challenge, William Ayers, in his book “Fugitive Days” admitted to creating over a hundred fraudulent Social Security numbers using names of deceased infants, who did not get their Social Security numbers before their deaths. “After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising: two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.
Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.” Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days. Ayers had a whole business of forged social security card making. It is unfortunate, that the person, occupying the position of the U.S. president, was using and is using a bogus social security number.
7. For 3 years after his inauguration Obama refused to provide to the public his long form birth certificate. On April 27, 2011, when Obama posted his alleged long form birth certificate on line, just as with his tax returns, he originally did not flatten the file, which means that anyone with an Adobe Illustrator program on his computer could see layers of alterations in this alleged “birth certificate”, which looked like a complete joke. Multiple long form birth certificates from 1961 are available. In those years green safety paper was
not available and was not used. Other birth certificates, as one for Susan Nordyke, born the next day on August 5, 1961, in the same hospital, and signed by the registrar on August 11, 1961, show white paper with yellow aging stains, clear borders, raised seal and a lower serial number. Obama’s alleged birth certificate is on a safety paper, which was not used in 1961, does not havea clear border, no raised seal and the serial number is higher, than the numbers issued later by the same registrar. Exhibit 9
8. Taitz received an affidavit from Adobe illustrator expert Chito Papa exhibit 7.
It showed layers of alteration of the alleged birth certificate. It showed a signature of Obama’s mother Stanley Ann D. Soetoro, where it looks, like Soetoro (her married name by her second husband) was erased, whitened out and computer graphics was used to add “unham Obama” and a signature “Stanley Ann Dunham Obama” was created by pasting and filling the blanks with computer graphics.
9. Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. Exhibit 8. It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different types of ink used. Some of the document shows, as gray scale scanning, some as black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and kerning, meaning some letters encroaching into the space of other letters, which is possible only with computer graphics, not with a typewriter used in 1961. Numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics. It appears, that Obama used a Social Security number of a deceased elderly individual, as well as a birth certificate number of a deceased infant. Research pointed to the fact, that one, Virginia Sunahara was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961 and passed away the next day. Recently her surviving brother Dunken Sunahara demanded to see her long form birth certificate, but the department of Health denied the request, even though it came from a close relative. Department of Health provided Mr. Sunahara only with a computer generated short form birth certificate with a serial number, which was suspiciously out of sequence from all the other numbers issued to infants born August 4, 1961.
In spite of numerous demands, Director of Health, Loretta Fuddy refused to allow the inspection of the original birth certificate of either Obama or Sunahara in lieu of the alleged certified copy, and the Social Security administration refused to provide even a redacted application for CT SSN 042-68-4425, which Obama is fraudulently using. It is imperative, that this office investigate not only Obama, but also director of Health Loretta Fuddy, registrar Alvin Onaka, Deputy attorney General Nagamine and former Chairwoman of the Democrat National Convention in 2008 Nancy Pelosi, who certified Obama’s prior certificate of candidate, as well as Attorney General Eric Holder, Commissioner of Social Security Michael Astrue, and a number of judges involved in this affair, for purpose of criminal prosecution for conspiracy to commit fraud, uttering of forged documents, alteration/forgery of documents, elections fraud and Social Security Fraud.
10. Based on all of the above, Obama does not have any valid identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot, running for the US Presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
11. Additionally, many believe, that “Natural Born Citizen,” as it is applied to the U.S. Presidency, means one born in the country regardless of citizenship of the parents. Taitz submits evidence, that from the time of the adoption of the constitution untill today, the standard was: One born in the country to parents who are citizens, who do not owe allegiance to other nations.
The US Constitution was largely based upon the book “the Law of Nations” by Emer De Vattel, stating that Natural born citizens are ones born in the Nations to citizens (Emer De Vattel “The Law of Nations” p499, §212). A similar definition was used by John A. Bingham, creator on the 14th amendment, who stated during congressional hearings of the 14th amendment, that a “natural born citizen is born in the U.S. territories to parents, who didn’t owe allegiance to other sovereignties”. Similar definition was used in a case of Minor v Happerset 88 US, 162 (1875) heard by the Supreme Court. Lastly, in 2008 citizenship of John McCain was questioned as well due to his birth in the zone of the Panama canal. In a joint Senate Resolution 511, the Senate unanimously found Senator McCain to be Natural Born U.S. citizen. The Senate used the same Vattel two prong test and found McCain to be eligible for presidency due to the fact that he was born in the f Panama Canal zone to two parents, who were U.S. citizens. Obama’s father was never a U.S. Citizen. He never even had a “Green Card”. He was in U.S. for a few years, on a student visa and as such, Obama did not satisfy either one of the two prongs of the test for natural born status. Even if this office was to subscribe to a more liberal modern definition of a natural born citizen, Obama does not qualify as he never proved his birth in Hawaii and is using a computer-generated forgery instead of a valid long form birth certificate and he is fraudulently using a Social Security number, which was never assigned to him.