DC – Ex Rel. Sibley v Obama – Quo Warranto I – Doc 9 – Order denying petition

An order from the Court of Appeals. Apparently Sibley was not too happy with the speed of the proceedings and filed a motion with the COA.

[9] USCA ORDER (USCA Case Number 12-5040). Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, fora writ procedendum ad justicium, it is ORDERED that the petition be denied. The district courts delay in ruling on the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious or unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. (kb) (Entered: 03/07/2012)

Sibley announces that he is going on vacation and what does this judge do? Realizing that even Sibley understands this is not an urgent issue, he denies the petition for writ of mandamus.

Tell me that you did not see that one coming?…

Continue reading

DC – Ex Rel. Sibley v Obama – Quo Warranto I – Doc 20 – Notice of Appeal

[20] NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 19 Memorandum & Opinion, 18 Order on Motion to Expedite, Order on Motion for CM/ECF Password, Order on Motion for Discovery, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Dismiss, by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 4616049283. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (dr) (Entered: 06/19/2012)

DC – Ex Rel. Sibley v Obama – Quo Warranto I – Doc 10 – Motion for extension of time

[10] MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 03/08/2012)

If Sibley can go on vacation, then the defendants should have some extra time 🙂

Continue reading