MS – Taitz v Democrat Party – Response in opposition to motion for leave

Wow, in a few well chosen words, Begley explains why Orly’s so-called evidence fails.

Plaintiff Taitz, who has been an attorney for over 11 years, in her latest motion seeks to introduce what she describes as three items of “additional evidence and rulings supporting her opposition to defendants motion to dismiss” [sic]. The items in question are neither evidence nor rulings; they are also wholly irrelevant to the disposition of the fully-briefed dispositive motions.

Document Number: 106

Docket Text:
RESPONSE in Opposition re [105] MOTION for Leave to File ADDITIONAL NEW FACTS AND OPINIONS filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Begley, Samuel)

2 thoughts on “MS – Taitz v Democrat Party – Response in opposition to motion for leave

  1. It is rumored that a law student from HI was very helpful in generating this document, which explains why it is so well written and devastating.

  2. Onaka joins in the response

    Document Number: 107
    Docket Text:
    Joinder in Document by Alvin Onaka to [106] Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Democrat Party of Mississippi (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Article – Senate Confirms Rosen as Director of State Department of Health)(Dukes, Walter)

Comments are closed.