The Hawaiian “Walt”?

Funny… Totally unsupported by any legal arguments. Trying to argue that under common law, they have a right to arrest a person and serve a warrant. Fascinating failures to understand the law in these matters. This matter came from the “common court”, ROTFL.

As to failure to understand HRS 1.1

     §1-1  Common law of the State; exceptions.  The common law of England, as ascertained by English and American decisions, is declared to be the common law of the State of Hawaii in all cases, except as otherwise expressly provided by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or by the laws of the State, or fixed by Hawaiian judicial precedent, or established by Hawaiian usage; provided that no person shall be subject to criminal proceedings except as provided by the written laws of the United States or of the State. [L 1892, c 57, §5; am L 1903, c 32, §2; RL 1925, §1; RL 1935, §1; RL 1945, §1; RL 1955, §1-1; HRS §1-1]