Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL – Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Paul A. Guthrie, in propria persona,
(A.K.A. General Jedi Pauly)
Plaintiff
VS.
United States of America;
Barrack Hussein Obama II, the alleged President of the United States, of America, and individually;
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., the alleged Vice President of the United States of America, and individually;
Martin Dempsey, the alleged Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Office of the President of the United States of America, and individually, Eric Holder, the alleged Attorney General of the United States of America, and individually, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the alleged Secretary of the United States of America, and individually, Elena Kagan, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually, Sonia Sotomayor, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually, United States Congress; United States Senate; US. House of Representatives; et aL;
Defendants

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COMPLAINT AND PETITION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION, DECLARATORY RELIEF, MANDAMUS, AND
QUO WARRANTO, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff Paul Guthrie, a natural person pro se litigant appearing in proper person, files his complaint and petition for emergency injunction, declaratory relief, mandamus, and quo warranto against the defendants named above who are employed agents or entities of the United Sates Government, alleging as follows:

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1) The case before the Court is a case of fraud, the biggest fraud in the History of the United States, which has led to the overthrow of the People’s Government that is defined by the Constitution of the United States to Establish a sovereign Republic of sovereign Citizens with rights that are retained by the People.

a) Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States of America:

“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;….” [emphasis added]

b) 9th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America:

“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” [emphasis added]

c) 10th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” [emphasis added]

d) “Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) emphasis added

2) The fraud mentioned above is a conspiracy to permit a foreign political invasion, the result of a failure to apply the Title of Nobility provisions of the Constitution to US. citizen mothers who give birth to the offspring of foreign fathers in order to prevent those offspring from acting like Royalty who will be competing with the native U.S. citizen offspring for the Office of the President of the United States.

3) The fraud perpetrated by the defendants has caused the native government of the People that is established by the Constitution, to be replaced with a Monarchal Religious government that is foreign to the United States of America which places her native citizens under unlawful military occupation to a foreign King and his govenrmend and enslaves the natural born U.S. Citizen to a foreign power and authority which deprives the plaintiff and his fellow native citizens of their Liberty and Freedom and Legislative Powers.

4) Since the time of defendant Obama being a candidate for the office of President in 2008, there has been a controversy in the public arena and the courts regarding whether or not defendant Obama is a natural born citizen and thus qualified to be a candidate for the Office of President of the United States of America, or has any right to occupy the Office as President and exercise the duties and responsibilities that come with that Office.

5) Proof of the fact stated in 4 above can be verified by noting that there have been well over 100 matters in controversy brought against the defendant Mr. Obama in the last 4 plus years, attacking his eligibility under Article II natural born Citizen Clause, that have all been thrown out of court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (no injury). Yet, the controversy will not go away and is now only growing worse due to the defendant Mr Obama being selected to the Office of President once again, thus more cases are now being filed. The discovery made by the plaintiff Mr. Guthrie in this case before the court will stop all the controversy and settle this issue once and for all.

6) The controversy arises because there is no established definition for natural born citizen that exists in U.S. case law. The definition is meant to be derived from organic Law.

7) Contrary to popular opinion that heaps insults and accusations of malfeasance and incompetence upon the courts and judges who have looked at this issue, Plaintiff Guthrie does not agree with those beliefs. Not one case in controversy since before 2008 has properly stated any cogent facts that can cause a judge to take cognizance of any injury or a remedy.

8) The legal reason that no one has been able to establish standing in a court regarding Obama’s eligibility is that everyone involved in these cases believes that the term in Article II, natural born Citizen, is not defined in the Constitution itself because it is not specifically defined in words, and that when one appeals outside of the Constitution for meaning, there is doubt as to what the definition is, as if the outside sources also fail to define natural born Citizen or natural born citizen which, with a lower case ‘c’, has a general international definition that previous U.S. courts like Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), and Nguyen v. INS, 500 U.S. 53 (2001) for example, have not recognized or understood.

[NBC: No the legal reason is lack of standing, which has nothing to do with the simple fact that our Constitution does not define the term and that therefor its meaning has to be found in Common Law. US v Wong Kim Ark. As to previous courts having failed to properly understand, that’s a fascinating claim but again, without standing, a court cannot hear such ‘arguments’.]

9) The fact is that natural born Citizen is fully defined within the Constitution of the United States of America, not by words, but by Intent and by Political Context which does not actually require one to look to foreign sources outside of the Constitution for meaning, as one only needs the Declaration of Independence for a little guidance with comprehending the legal and Historic Political Context in Article II, but it does require one to apply the mechanisms of the Constitution itself (the Titles of Nobility provisions, the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights, and the Equal Protection Clauses), which when applied, actually define natural born Citizen meaning. No one has ever done this in 222 years as far as the plaintiff Guthrie has been able to determine, and certainly no one has done this yet in any matters in controversy regarding Obama, or else the courts would have granted subject matter jurisdiction by now, as the courts would be able to take cognizance of a specific, non-general grievance, injury, and remedy.

[NBC: In fact, the courts have found that the grievance is general and applies equally to all, furthermore, the courts have found that the issue is a political question. In other words, the lack of standing continues unabated. It does not matter that Guthrie believes that he has a better definition, his standing remains lacking.]

— editing in progress —

10) The confusion described above in 8 and 9, is the result of error made by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) that led to an unnecessary 19th Amendment to the Constitution. The confusion is further compounded by the Supreme Court case of Nguyen v. INS, 500 U.S. 53 (2001) which does not provide a satisfactory explanation for the judgment rendered by the court. The court can clearly be seen to not comprehend the Equal Protection issues in Nguyen v INS, which is the result of a lack of comprehension by all justices of what a natural born Citizen is or how it is defined in law.

[NBC: It is unclear why Guthrie believes that the 19th Amendment was unnecessary, but it extended voting rights to all US citizens, not just males. That Guthrie is not satisfied by the explanation of the court in Nguyen v INS is unfortunate but totally irrelevant. The case is quite straightforward.]

11) The two Supreme Court cases of Minor and Nguyen, and the error and confusion they have promulgated over time, are key indicators of something going wrong. The discovery by plaintiff Guthrie of the objective definition of natural born Citizen exposes the error, clears up the confusion, and corrects a huge amount of U.S. case law regarding citizenship by shining illumination upon the judgments rendered in those decisions.

[NBC: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Too bad that the court’s history has clearly established the meaning of natural born, as found in US Common Law.]

12) Further, the discovery by plaintiff Guthrie will prove to the Court that his case is distinguished from all others so far regarding Obarna and his eligibility in that plaintiffs case does have subject matter jurisdiction and standing because the discovered definition of natural born Citizen is a self-evident truth of Nature and natural reality that is beyond the subjective beliefs of Jukes or Kings, which allows the court to take cognizance of an objective injury that arises under the laws of the U.S. Constitution that is not general in nature, or that effects everyone equally, or is just a general grievance. The discovered definition of natural born Citizen shows the Court that there is a need for a remedy and that the remedy is well within the court’s jurisdiction and power to provide.

[NBC: Still no explanation as to why the grievance is not general in nature. It affects anyone, not just Mr Guthrie. The concept of standing is quite straightforward but often misunderstood.

There are three standing requirements:

  1. Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
  2. Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.[15]
  3. Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.[16]

Prohibition of generalized grievances: A plaintiff cannot sue if the injury is widely shared in an undifferentiated way with many people. For example, the general rule is that there is no federal taxpayer standing, as complaints about the spending of federal funds are too remote from the process of acquiring them. Such grievances are ordinarily more appropriately addressed in the representative branches.

There is no particular injury to Guthrie which is different from that to others, there is no direct causation between the injury and the stated issue and the courts lack redressability. The fact that Guthrie believes that he has resolved issues of jurisprudence, long since settled in US law, provides him with no privileged status.]

13) The self-evident definition of natural born Citizen discovered by plaintiff Guthrie will prove that the United States government has utterly failed to live up to the guarantee of ensuring a Republic Form of Government because the United States government has permitted a foreign political invasion or coup d’etat to take place that is the cause of the real and specific injuries that are being suffered not only by the plaintiff Guthrie and those like him who are natural born Citizens, but also an injury that is occurring to the States of the Union as well.

[NBC: Guthrie should be applauded for so carefully outlining the foundation as to why he lacks standing.]

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

14) This case is a civil action that arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States. This civil action claims violations of the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, Twentieth, Twenty-Fifth Amendments as well as violations of Article II of the U.S. Constitution. As such, the Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
15) This action seeks declaratory relief. This Court has authority to grant declaratory relief pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 28 U.S.C. § 2202. This action is also in the nature of mandamus, and seeks to compel those defendants which are branches of the United States Government and “officer[s} or employee[s] of the United States or any agency thereof’ to perform their duties owed plaintiff under the First, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, Twentieth, and Twenty-Fifth Amendments, and under Article II of the Constitution of the United States of America, and under the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. Additionally, this court has ancillary jurisdiction over this action sounding in mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) for this Court already has original jurisdiction under other statutes already cited herein. This action is also in the nature of a petition for quo warranto under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution, asking that Obama be declared under Article II, according to the objective legal definition of natural born Citizen, to be ineligible to hold the Office of President and Commander in Chief, and that he be removed from that office if he be sworn in and be permanently barred from holding that office. This Court has jurisdiction over this petition because the plaintiff claims that his right to this writ emanates from his rights and powers under the Ninth and Tenth Amendment and under the Article II, natural born Citizen definition, as they are describing and securing natural political rights that belong to the plaintiff that the government refuses to secure. Additionally this Court has ancillary jurisdiction over this petition for quo wan-anto pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), for this Court already has original jurisdiction over plaintiffs other claims herein.

[NBC: Actions of Quo Warranto against a federal officer have to be initiated in the Courts of Washington DC, furthermore, Guthrie lacks in status as someone who may files such a writ.]

16) This action seeks injunctive relief. This Court has authority to grant injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1361 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343.

17) This is a civil action in which an officer or employee of the United States acting in his official capacity or under the color of legal authority and agencies of the United Sates are defendants. The plaintiff resides in this judicial district. There is no real properly involved in this action. Venue is therefore proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).

PARTIES

18) Plaintiff Paul Guthrie [hereinafter also referred to as plaintiff or Guthrie] is an adult natural person who is Jewish by inheritance from his mother, and he is an Atheist. He is a natural born U.S. Citizen (a native of the U.S. born to a U.S. State citizen father). His address is 7797 South Carefree Drive, Pendleton, Indiana 46064.

[NBC: Guthrie appears to hold to an unnecessarily restrictive interpretation of the term natural born.]

19) Defendant Barack Hussein Obama 11, [hereinafter referred to as Obama or King Obama] is an adult natural person employee of the United States government. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen at birth by statutory authority (U.S. citizen mother and Kenyan father) born a foreigner of the U.S. naturally belonging to some other jurisdiction at birth) (see Nguyen v. INS, 500 U.S.C. 53 (2001)). His official address is The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500.

[NBC: President Obama is not a citizen by statute but rather through our Constitution and the 14th Amendment which recognizes that every person born on our soil, and subject to our jurisdiction, is a natural born citizen. ]

20) Defendant Joseph Robinette Biden [hereinafter referred to as Biden] is an adult natural person employee of the United States government. His official address is The White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC, 20500.

21) Defendant Martin Dempsey [hereinafter referred to as Dempsey] is an adult natural person employee of the U.S. military armed forces on special assignment with the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Office of the President. His official address is Pentagon, 9999 Joint Staff Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20318.

22) Defendant Eric Holder [hereinafter referred to as Holder] is an adult natural person employee of the United States Department of Justice. His official address is United States Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20530.

23) Defendant Hillary Rodham Clinton [hereinafter referred to as Clinton] is an adult natural person employee of the United States Department of State. Her official address is United States Department of State, 2201 C Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20037.

24) Defendant Elena Kagan [hereinafter referred to as Kagan] is an adult natural person employee of the Supreme Court of the United States. Her official address is Supreme Court of the United States, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20543.

25) Sonia Sotomayor [hereinafter referred to as Sotomayor] is a natural person employee of the Supreme Court of the United States. Her official address is Supreme Court of the United States, 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20543.

26) Defendant United States of America [hereinafter referred to as the U.S. or government] is an artificial entity created by the People, which is supposed to represent the three branches of government, Legislative, Executive, and Judicial, which were created by the People for themselves to serve themselves. Service on the United States should be provided to the Office of the United States Attorney, Southern District of Indiana, 10 West Market Street, Suite 2100, Indianapolis, IN 460204, and to the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20530, as governed by Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

27) Defendant United States Congress [hereinafter referred to as Congress or the government] is an artificial entity that represents the Legislative branch of the government described in 26 above. Its address is Congress of the United States, Washington D.C.

28) Defendant United States Senate [hereinafter referred to as Senate or the government] is an artificial entity that represents one half of the bi-cameral Congress referred to in 27 above. Its official address is U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C. 20510.

29) Defendant U.S. House of Representatives [hereinafter referred to as House or government] is an artificial entity that represents the other half of the bi-cameral Congress referred to in 27 above. Its official address is U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. 20515.

30) Defendant et al. represents those persons or person, natural or artificial, who are unknown at this time but may be discovered along the way and can be added to this suit.

INTRODUCTION

31) This section of plaintiffs suit deals with the discovery that the term natural born Citizen, as that phrase exists in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States of America, has not been understood for 222 years since the Bill of Rights was ratified, and it turns out, contrary to popular opinion, that the term is fully defined within the Constitution both by Intent and by Political Context, and that no U.S. judge in 222 years has ever had to decipher the code with regard to the Office of President because all elected Presidents before Barack Obama were either:

a) Born as the offspring of a United States citizen father who was a State citizen of the Union of States that forms the United States of America, as defined by the Constitution of the United States of America.
b) Or, they fall under the Sunset clause of Article II qualifications for the Office of President.

32) The fact that natural born Citizen is fully defined in the Constitution is completely contrary to the U.S. case law and judges’ opinions which have established the term in Article II, natural born Citizen, to be defined as a nebulous undefined term in the Constitution which is full of doubt as to its meaning and definition and which does not define or secure any political voting rights for U.S. female natural born Citizens. [see Minor v Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), and 19th Amendment]

33) As a result of 31 and 32 above, there is no case-law definition in U.S. law that specifically defines the term natural born Citizen, which is already fully defined in the Constitution if one knows how to apply the rest of the Constitution and the rules of jurisprudence to elucidate and decipher the definition and meaning.

34) Plaintiff Paul Guthrie is the only person alive who has cracked the code of the Constitution and has discovered the objective definition of Article II natural born Citizen.

35) As a result of 31 through 34 above, no one of the defendants or their counsel objectively knows what a natural born Citizen is, what it means, or how it is defined, as they are stuck with only subjective beliefs as their source of authority for determining the definition and meaning of Article II natural born Citizen.

36) As a result of 31 through 35 above, the definition and meaning of natural born Citizen is subject to interpretation only using subjective belief by those who are unaware of how it is defined in the Constitution, and the defendants’ purely subjective beliefs and opinions of what a natural born Citizen is has caused them to be acting under the false color of law, with no ability to provide objective proof of a lawful warrant that entitles them to their positions in government.

37) Due to the fact that the defendants and their counsel do not know or comprehend where natural born Citizens come from, or who or what creates them, or what they are, the defendants are incapable of determining whether or not the person who appointed them to their positions is qualified to make such appointments.

38) Congress approved the defendants’ appointments, not because they have an ability to objectively determine that defendant Obama is qualified to make such appointments, but instead the unlawful appointments were approved by Congress because they have a vested interest in maintaining the appearance that they and the defendants are not operating under false color of law, as Congress does not know what a natural born Citizen is either. This is a conspiracy to commit fraud upon the People and plaintiff, either by intent or by ignorance due to Congress relying upon purely subjective beliefs and opinions only. [see Congressional Research Services Memo publication (CRS Report) put out by Congress after 2008 regarding the meaning of natural born Citizen.]

39) Due to 31 through 38 above, the defendants have all overthrown the native People’s government that was established by the Constitution of the United States, and they have established a Monarchy-Religion for a government with a King that they call President. The government now operates strictly like a religion with the laws based upon purely subjective beliefs, with nothing objective and tangible to prove that the country is governed by any established objective standard rule of law, or that the People are bound to accept that the laws are valid and must be obeyed, as no consent can be shown to have been obtained from the People by the three branches for any laws that they have passed since Obama has been in power.

40) As a result of 39, the current three branches of the U.S. government form a non-Representative, non-elected foreign government that bases the source of its authority for its laws to come from the foreign country of Kenya.

41) As a result of 39 and 40, the plaintiff Paul Guthrie has been a man without a country since the first selection of Obama in 2008, and the situation is still ongoing and growing worse. The plaintiff Mr. Guthrie has been forced by the actions of the defendants to be living in terror like a ‘Jew’ in Nazi Germany in the 1930’s or 1940’s, or like a black slave during slavery in the South. The actions of the defendants have stripped Guthrie of any recognition or protection of his citizenship status and the political rights that are attached to that status.

42) Defendant Dempsey is currently the acting Commander-in-Chief of the United States Armed Forces who is acting out this role in defiance of the Constitution of the United States, and also contrary to U.S. code which vests such power and authority only with the President and prohibits defendant Dempsey from being the Commander-in-Chief of the Military:

10 USC 155
(e) Prohibition of Function as Armed Forces General Staff.— The Joint Staff shall not operate or be organized as an overall Armed Forces General Staff and shall have no executive authority. The Joint Staff may be organized and may operate along conventional staff lines.

43) As a result of 41 and 42 above, and due to the purely subjective beliefs of the defendants plaintiff Guthrie is being subjected to unlawful military dictatorship and has been totally and completely deprived of his Political, Economic, and Religious Liberty by the actions or inactions of the defendants which is causing Guthrie to be forced to live subject to governmental religious tyranny by the defendants whom plaintiff must worship and believe are God in order to accept that the government is the plaintiffs government, and that this government is legitimate and that the laws of that government are valid and must be obeyed.

DEFINITIONS SECTION
(Introduction continued)
PROOF OF THE DEFINITION OF natural born Citizen

PART I

Natural Law Theory of the Father (fact)

44) “We the People” created the Constitution. (see Constitution)

45) The Constitution creates the three branches of government. (see Constitution)

46) “We the People” are the male and female citizens of the United States. (natural fact)

47) The male and female citizens represent the Natural Law jurisdiction of government. (natural fact)

48) By deduction due to the defined facts of law in 47, and by a and d in PART III of the definitions section below, the three branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, represent the Positive Law jurisdiction of government. (fact by definition in a, d, below and 47, above)

49) Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United Sates Constitution bans Titles of Nobility, Federal.

50) Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution bans Titles of Nobility, State.

51) 49 and 50 operate on 47 to prevent:

a) Congress, Executive and Judicial branches from applying the positive law authority of 48 to declare the offspring of U.S. State citizen male fathers and foreign female mothers to be either a
naturalized U.S. citizen of a foreign country, or from being natural born Citizens (U.S. natives) that are also natives of a foreign country or foreign state. This prevents a male U.S. citizen or U.S. President from acting like a King who can create rulers of foreign political societies via his offspring to foreign females. This binds the male citizen and his offspring to the father’s U.S. citizenship, making the male U.S. citizen’s choice in female with which to produce offspring irrelevant for Article II natural born Citizen status. This ensures that native U.S. citizen males from the States can only create membership for their offspring to be in U.S. society that is inherited as a natural right claim of sovereign political authority from their U.S. State citizen father. (logical fact)
b) Congress, Executive and Judicial branches from applying the positive law authority of 48 to declare the offspring of a U.S. State citizen female mother and foreign male father to be natural born Citizens that can be President. This prevents the female citizen from acting like a Queen. This binds the female citizen and her offspring to U.S. citizenship via the male U.S. citizen father and his State citizenship in order for her offspring to be considered natural born U.S. citizens that can be President. Also, it protects the female mother’s choice in what country she wants to create natural born citizens by protecting her choice and the political rights of the native males of her society from the consequences of rape by a foreign male. (logical fact)

52) Mr. Obama is the offspring of a U.S. citizen mother and foreign father, making him a naturalized-at-birth U.S. citizen (Positive Law only, adopted citizen), the opposite of a natural born U.S. Citizen. (Natural Law only, born to a U.S. citizen father from a State, inherited right of citizenship) (natural fact)

53) Due to 49, 50, 51, 52 above, Obama is not a natural born Citizen and is barred by the Constitution from serving as President and has no natural right or legal right claim to that Office. (logical deduction natural fact)

PART II (Definitions continued)

The Natural Law Theory (Principle of Nature) of the Father fully defines natural born Citizen (natural fact)
54) The above 10 points in PART I establishes the Natural Law Theory of the Father to be a fact. (natural fact)

55) The defendant’s Theory is called the Positive Law Theory definition, which seeks to define natural born Citizen by the place of birth in Hawaii (Positive Law) and by the offspring of a U.S. citizen female mother and foreign male father (Positive Law). (natural fact)

56) The only other Theory in case law is called the Unity Theory definition, which seeks to define natural born Citizen by both place of birth (U.S. territory jurisdiction – Positive Law) and by both of the U.S. citizen parents (Natural Law). The Unity Theory is a unity of both Positive Law and Natural Law. (natural fact)

57) Taken together, the Positive Law Theory, the Unity Theory, and the Natural Law Theory account for all of the possible definitions of Article II natural born Citizen. (logical fact)

58) The Positive Law Theory of 55 violates number 51b above. Therefore The Positive Law Theory is pure supposition that is unsupported by any U.S. law or by the Constitution. The Theory fails because it does not establish a fact. (natural fact)

59) The Unity Theory of 56 violates both 51a and 51b above and would permit the U.S. citizens of the federal territories and possessions to vote for and run for President of the United States. Therefore The Unity Theory is pure supposition that is unsupported by any U.S. law or by the Constitution. The Theory fails because it does not establish a fact. (natural fact)

60) Due to 57 above, and due to the process of elimination described in 58 and 59, The Natural Law Theory of the Father is the only established fact that is left that does not violate 51a or 51b above. Therefore it fully defines Article II natural born Citizen to mean the offspring who are born to (physically created by) a U.S. State citizen father. (logical natural fact)

PART III (Definitions Continued)

a) The U.S. legal code and system of jurisprudence is defined and governed by both Natural Law and Positive Law. (fact, by definition, natural fact)

b) Natural Law is defined to be Opposite and Opposed to Positive Law. (fact by definition, natural fact)

c) Natural Law is defined solely by the Laws of Nature, not by Positive Law powers or authority. (fact by legal definition and by the laws of nature via natural observation and logic which is why it is defined in positive law this way in a and b above.) (natural fact and legal definition)

d) Positive Law is man-made codes, statutes, Constitution, rules, and regulations. (natural fact and legal definition)

e) The term natural born citizen, with a lower case ‘c’, is a general non-specific, non-positive-law legal term expression., which is defined solely by the Natural Law authority that governs the meaning of native citizenship in any country world¬wide, and means: any natural person offspring who is born into (inherits) a natural right claim to membership (citizenship) in the political society (country) of the father who created the offspring. [(natural fact), see Emmerich de Vattel: Law of Nations The Principles of the Law of Nature applied to Nations and Sovereigns; Book 1, Chapter 19, Sections 212, 213, 215, (extract below in i). Mr. Vattel is not a U.S. positive law authority, but is a natural law authority who is only describing how the natural law authority of Nature and Her laws govern and define the positive law authority of man and his statutory definitions. Vattel Law of Nations is just an international science ofpolitical law text book, not a specific positive law authority, merely a source of authority that positive law authorities (judges and law students) may learn from to give meaning and comprehension to what is written in the positive law, Constitution, and codes, that govern what it means to be a citizen or a political member of a society that is governed by laws that protect, and thus provide, rights.]

I) The term natural born Citizen, as it occurs in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, differs slightly from e above. The placement in the Constitution specifically defines the general expression in e above by adding the specific political context that is specific to the United States of America. The placement attaches the positive law via the Constitution (Organic law) in order to make the general expression into a specific legal term under US. law, as having specific rights attached that are recognized to be defined both in Nature by Her political laws (Natural Law), and by the positive law authority (Positive Law) of the specific country’s Constitution. Each country uses the general term and places it into their Organic law (Positive Law) which then defines it as a specific legal term and meaning instead of just a general non-specific, non-legal definition.

The term natural born Citizen spelled with a capital ‘C’ in our Constitution, is a specific non-general usage of the general term described in e above which specifically describes and defines a specific type of United States citizenship with specific rights attached. In the U.S. Constitution, it specifically means one who both obtains citizenship, and has their citizenship defined, as a result of the specific political condition of being born to a father who is a five non-slave citizen of a State of one of the union of States created by the Constitution. In each country, their native constitutions will attach the Organic code (positive law) and add the specific political context of their native political society to the general expression in e above in order to define the natural born status meaning in their political society that is governed and defined by their territorial borders over which they claim dominion, and by their Organic law or by their positive law powers alone. [(natural fact), evidence: King George III of England and the British empire, as contrasted with our Constitution which does not recognize citizens that are slaves (‘subjects’) or slaves that are citizens (‘subjects’), or that a king creates all citizens (subjects’).]

g) As a result of e and f above, Article II natural born Citizen defines a specific type of U.S. citizenship that means a citizen who is born inheriting a natural right claim to membership in both a State political society that is defined by a State Constitution or Organic code, and also membership in a National political society that is defined by the National Organic code which is the United States Constitution. Therefore, not all those who are born U.S. citizens are natural born Citizens because some are born into their State and U.S. citizenship as a function of positive law authority only (14th Amendment) and their claim is not a naturally-inherited one. These citizens by positive law authority are the naturalized-at-birth citizens (positive law authority only, the adopted foreign offspring), not the natural born ones (Natural law authority only, offspring of a native father), the opposite by definition b above, because the natural born ones are created solely as a function of Natural law authority only. Those that are born under the 14th Amendment are natural born citizens with a lower case ‘c’ of some country as is determined by the offspring’s paternal parent (male father) and the codes of his foreign country. His offspring are just not natural born citizens (synonymous with ‘native offspring of a native father’) of the United States under Article II meaning (from a State of the Union). If they were, that would make them natural born Citizens, and not natural born citizens, a term which means native members of some other political society at the time of birth other than the United States of America. The United States positive law authority does not apply in order to define the offspring of foreign fathers and their natural born citizen status as to not interfere with that native right that exists in the foreign jurisdiction of the father. This is one of the effects of the Title of Nobility provisions of the Constitution upon the offspring of male fathers. Those who rely upon the 14h Amendment for the definition of their citizenship and political rights within U.S. society have all of the same rights as a native U.S. natural born Citizen with the exception of the political right to be President or Vice President. The Constitution was not created to recognize and protect such a natural political right for a male foreign citizen and his offspring, as their natural political rights are already defined and secured in the native society of the foreign father. (Natural fact of logic and observation.) Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 6th revised edition 1856:

NATURALIZED CITIZEN. One who, being born an alien, has lawfully become a citizen of the United States under the Constitution and laws.

2. He has all the rights of a natural born citizen, except that of being eligible as president or vice-president of the United States. In foreign countries he has a right to be treated as such, and will be so considered even in the country of his birth, at least for most purposes. 1 Bos. & P. 430. See Citizen; Domicil; Inhabitant.
h) There exist only two types of truth, objective truth and subjective truth. It does not require subjective truth in order to secure justice, although subjective truth alone can secure justice by probability. Objective truth alone is what is required to both define what justice is and to secure it as a fact that does not require percentages. (fact of nature, evidence in law: this is why we have juries to be finders of both the facts and law because the positive law is only limited to what is in the codes and regulations, but the entire law also includes what is criminal or ‘rnalum in se’ or what is wrong in its essence, or in other words, by the Laws of Nature which only humans can define with their knowledge of what is a morally wrong and what is not, regardless of what a statute or code says that may or may not apply.)

i) The phrases “born in the country, of parents who are citizens”, and “born in the country, to parents who are citizens”, are synonymous phrases that have a legal meaning. The phrase “born in the country” means born into the country in a political sense, as in an offspring who is born completely and totally a subject of, or subject to, the authorizing political authority that creates the citizen. The common mistake of the Unity Theorist is to ignore the legal meaning, then read “born in the country” and interpret that to mean that one must be physically born in the territorial jurisdiction of the same political state that the parents who created the offspring are citizens of. This is incorrect and indicates a failure to apply the rules of jurisprudence with regard to subject matter jurisdiction, i.e., the natural law authority from human ‘parents’ who are natural persons, versus positive law authority which is the state, an artificial entity that cannot create offspring who are natives of some society, as the state can only create “naturalized citizens” as a function of positive law authority, by defmition. One must apply rules of law and apply the law in a political context, which is the proper and necessary context in order to understand the meaning. The second mistake that directly results from this misreading is that the Unity Theorist reads, “of parents who are citizens”, and concludes that it requires both parents to be citizens of the same political state because parent(s) is plural. The Unity Theorists stop reading from Law of Nations at this point (after the second sentence of paragraph Section 212, Book 1, Chapter 19) and is convinced that Obama is not a natural born Citizen and starts filing cases in court against Obama. Anyone who understands the title of Mr. Vattel’s treatise will comprehend that he is talking about Natural Law and how it governs Positive Law definitions and practices. What Vattel is relating, is that in any natural sovereign political society where we are not talking about Kings, who are artificial sovereign political authorities, then it is the natural sovereign human parents in general, and specifically the citizen father, who uses sexual reproduction (natural law authority) to physically create offspring who are born inheriting a natural right claim to citizenship (membership) in the father’s political society. These are the naturally-created native citizens that do not have to be adopted by the society or rely upon kings or ‘subject’ status for their right to be citizen or President (positive law authority). They are born into their political condition (synonymous with born in the country) as a function of being created by parents (natural law only) who are already members of the political society into which the offspring are being born. (“of parents who are citizens”) The illusion in the minds of both the Positive Law Theorist and the Unity Theorist is that there is only one political authority in any country that can create citizens (the ‘government’ creates citizens). They forget that we are no longer a monarchy under King George who created all citizens by positive law only (‘subject’ status). In the United States, there are two authorities that can create citizens, the parents, who are the fourth branch of government representing the natural law authority of the country who can create natural born Citizens, and the three branches of the state who represent the positive law
authority of the country, who can create naturalized citizens with statutory authority and even legislate that citizenship is automatic at birth. (see Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) and Nguyen v. INS, 500 U.S. 53(2001))

The offspring must be born “completely and totally a subject of,or subject to” one of the two authorizing authorities of the country, as then the offspring are born into political membership or citizenship or “born in the country”, regardless of where they are physically born. By Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875), it only takes one of the authorities and membership is mutually exclusive. Only those born under the natural law authority of the parents (specifically the father) can be a native ‘natural born’ member of the father’s political society (country). This is what Mr. Vattel actually relates, if one only bothers to read the rest of the paragraph Section 212 and following Sections. I have extracted them here and highlighted them for clarity. From Law of Nations Book 1, Chapter 19: §2I2. Citizens and natives. The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see, whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society ii which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for if he is born there of a
foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country. [Emphasis added]

§215. Children of citizens, born in a foreign country. It is asked, whether the children born of citizens in a foreign country are citizens? The laws have decided this question in several countries, and their regulations must be followed. By the law of nature alone, children follow the condition of their fathers, and enter into all their rights (§212); the place of birth produces no change in this particular, and cannot of itself furnish any reason for taking from a child what nature has given him; [Emphasis added]

SUMMARY OF THE DEFINITIONS

The political Law of Nature in non-Monarchy forms of Government

PARTI1V (Definitions continued)

A) The right to be President of the United States and the natural right to citizenship in the U.S. (natural born status) are natural political rights that in the U.S. must be inherited. They are not legal rights created by Congress to be bestowed. This is a natural fact.

B) The natural right to be President or the natural right to be a citizen of the U.S., or of any particular society, is only passed on by a male citizen father of the society to his offspring. This is a universal natural law.

C) Obama’s father was an alien to the United States, so Mr. Obama does not possess the right to be President of the U.S., nor can he claim a natural right to citizenship, as his father cannot pass on that right to his offspring, given that rights only come from male U.S. citizen fathers who are State citizens and given that we do not recognize Titles of Nobility under our Constitution, which prohibits their creation. This is a natural fact.

D) Nature binds a male to only his own political society of which the male is a member, so that he can only create natural members of his own society, regardless of his choice in female mate and her political condition (citizenship), and only by the male’s own authority and voluntary consent. Males never have to submit themselves to an authority other than themselves in order to create natural members of their own political societies. Only the male possesses the natural right to pass on natural membership and natural political rights to the offspring by his own authority. This is a universal natural law.

E) Female citizens are not naturally politically bound to any one society, and can create natural members of any society, or even several different societies, regardless of her political condition (citizenship), which is irrelevant in determining the natural born status of her offspring, and regardless of her consent. Females do not possess the natural right to pass on natural membership and natural political rights to the offspring on their own authority since they are not hermaphrodites, and are required to submit to a male authority in order for them to secure the ability to be able to create natural members of any one particular
society. This is a universal natural law.

F) For the reasons stated above in A through E, the natural right to be President and the natural right to membership in U.S. society (natural born Citizen status) is only secured for the offspring by the male members of the society, and this has always been recognized to be reflected in U.S. Law. Therefore, in order to secure these rights for the offspring, it requires that child to be created by a citizen father, and the place of birth and political condition of the mother are both irrelevant as they do not secure any natural political rights for the offspring in any society. This is a universal natural law.

THIS ENDS THE DEFINITIONS SECTION

INJURY SECTION BEGINS

PART V (This begins the injury and standing section)

STANDING AND INJURIES

Subsection 1 (Count 1)

Equal Protection

The Natural Law Theory of the father secures political equality for U.S. citizen males and females as natural born Citizens only, and establishes the defendants Positive Law Theory claim to be violating the Equal Protection Clauses that are meant to secure the natural political rights of both male and female U.S. citizens to be equal via the natural born Citizen definition.

61) The government’s Positive Law Theory violates 5 lb above and grants a Title of Nobility to females which establishes a Royal political society among the U.S. citizen females who can give birth to the offspring of foreign males, offspring who can then be the political head of state. (President) This is what a Queen does.

62) For the reason that is stated in 61, the male U.S. citizen is disenfranchised of his political equality with female U.S. citizens and is forced to compete for the Office of President with the offspring of foreign males. This is a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution. The government’s Positive Law Theory removes the established political equality between males and females that the Constitution is meant to establish with the Natural Law Theory definition of natural born Citizen.

63) Due to 61, the freedom, or natural right, for female U.S. citizens to voluntarily choose in which political society to create natural born members is unsecured by the Constitution which exposes females to rape by foreign males who can create offspring that can become President.

64) Due to 63, the male U.S. citizen is forced to compete with foreign males and their offspring for entitlement to hold the Office of President.

65) The Constitution never intended to, nor does it, secure those political right privileges for foreign males or their offspring.

66) Due to 61 through 65 above, the plaintiff Paul Guthrie who is a natural born Citizen (U.S. native), and not just a natural born citizen (foreign native), has suffered an injury to his natural political right and legal political right to political equality within his political class of natural born Citizen.

Subsection 2 (equal protection continued) (Count 2)

Monarchy Form of Government

Defendant Obama’s Presidency represents the establishment of a Monarchy since his unlawful selection and his unlawful conveyance by Congress in 2008 and ongoing in 2012.

67) Due to 61 through 66 above, Obama’s tenure in Office and ongoing Presidency establishes a Monarchy form of government that is identical to the government and political conditions as were under King George III, that is, a foreign unelected government to that of the native People’s Constitutions. [see Decl. Indep.]

68) Due to 67 above, the defendant Congress has established Obama to be a King of a foreign power government and not a President of the government of the People, in violation of Article I, Section 9, clause 8 and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, and Article II, Section 1, clause 5.

69) Due to 67 and 68 above, the three branches of government no longer belong to the People. The three branches of government now belong to King Obama, Congress, the Executive branch, the Judicial branch, the other defendants, and those of society who claim membership in the privileged Royal political society of Obama and the defendants. The People have had their native Constitutional government unlawfully taken from them by the use of fraud, deception, and unlawful use of force, by the voluntary will of Congress, State and Federal actors and authorities (who could be added as defendants), and by Obama himself with the support of the propaganda ministry defendants, a situation which is still ongoing and growing worse.

70) Despite numerous challenges to Mr. Obama’s eligibility since before the selection of 2008 and also 2012, the State Secretaries of State placed King Obama on the ballots in both 2008 and 2012 for selection of King and not President. There has not been a lawful Presidential election since 2004 or lawful representative government of the People since 2009.

71) Due to 69 and 70 above, the fact that the State Secretaries of State put Obama on the ballot for the federal selection of King in 2008 and 2012 gives the appearance that it is the intention of the State and Federal government to work in collusion in order to overthrow the Constitution of the People of the United States and establish a King and Monarchial Tyranny over the People in order to enslave them.

72) Due to 69 above, all laws enacted and passed by the government of King Obama, 111th Congress (2009-2010), 112 Congress (2011-2012), and future Congresses are null and void., as they do not have the consent of the People because it is not the government of the People.

73) Due to 67 through 72, the People and plaintiff Paul Guthrie have had their natural right of freedom to self-determination unlawfully denied. King Obama and his Parliament (defendant Congress) have unlawfully denied the People their natural right to Legislative powers and authority. As such natural political rights are “incapable of Annihilation” [Decl. Indep.] by the actions of Tyrants and Kings, plaintiff Paul Guthrie joins with the other numerous petitioners who have been returning time and time again in vain attempts since before the 2008 selection of King Obama, and he petitions the Court to secure his and their rightful claim to Liberty. [see Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution]

74) The above points in Subsection 2, 67 through 73, marked as facts, proves that the defendants are conspiring to create an insufferable political injury to the plaintiffs ability to secure his natural and legal right to have his sovereign political authority recognized, which is the natural right secured by the Constitution in Article II, the sovereign political authority of the natural person citizen of the U.S. to have the freedom to secure rights and justice to, and for, oneself, according to a standard rule of law. It is a natural right of self-determination necessity that is meant to be protected in Article II for both male and female natural born Citizens by the already-defined and known meaning of natural born Citizen, in order that the People may secure Liberty and Justice for the People.

75) The inability of plaintiff Guthrie to secure his natural political rights, which are essential in order to secure Liberty and Justice to and for himself, constitutes a political condition of involuntary servitude to a King and his foreign government for all and any rights. This forces plaintiff Guthrie, to live with no representation under the despotic authority of the defendants, who have by their actions, created the three branches to be a government of the government, by the government, and for the government, which is King Obama. Plaintiff Paul Guthrie is outside of the purpose of his native Government, each day hoping for the benevolence of the King and his foreign government to bestow plaintiff with rights and privileges according to King Obama and his government’s opinions of what rights or benefits exist and are needed or required for ‘subject’ Guthrie, who is not recognized as a free sovereign natural born Citizen with natural rights to a natural born Citizen national identity and President that define Guthrie’s country and rights and his native political society into which he was born.

76) The facts described in 74 and 75 above, prove that the plaintiff Paul Guthrie is being forced by the fraud under the color of law conspiracy of the defendants to suffer the political right injury of having no way to secure or derive any political rights, benefits or protections of law from the government of the Constitution, as the government of the Constitution no longer exists, with the exception of most of the judiciary minus the Obama appointees. The Monarchy government that is left only serves itself and its privileged class of followers, because the three branches no longer belong to the People. The federal courts already have many Obama appointees and even the Supreme Court already has two members of King Obama’s ministers on the bench, which is why they are listed as defendants in this suit. The government of King Obama, and the two defendants Kagan and Sotomayor, do not recognize the natural born Citizen status of plaintiff Mr. Guthrie or anyone else who is a native U.S. citizen that is born to a free non-slave State citizen father, and therefore King Obama and his government are not under the Constitution, as they, their government, and their privileged Royal class of followers do not recognize an entire non-Royal political class of free non-slave sovereign citizen males of the political society, a political society that is only created for U.S. males and U.S. females by the Constitution and its recognition, acceptance, and enforcement of the natural born Citizen Clause. This is a total loss of plaintiffs political right freedoms, caused by both King Obama and his government, and by the society at large who are the King’s supporters, a loss that was meant to be prevented by being secured and protected by the Article II natural born Citizen clause, and by other provisions of the Constitution such as the Title of Nobility prohibitions and the First Amendment, and by the Constitution itself.

77) All the defendants have a vested interest in maintaining their fraud and in conspiring to prevent the truth from being known. It has already happened in the case of Purpura v. Sebelius (3rd cca) that was refused certiorari. The district judge in that case refused to recuse himself. He was an Obama appointee. Plaintiff Purpura alleged that the Patient Protection and Affordability Care Act (PPACA) was unconstitutional because defendant Obama was not a natural born Citizen. The judge refused several times and Purpura even employed an en banc hearing that resulted in a judgment supporting the judge’s refusal to recuse. In light of plaintiff Guthrie’s discovery of the objective definition of natural born Citizen, it can be seen that the judges were technically correct. The decision rendered from the 3rd circuit district court that was upheld on appeal was that the plaintiffs lacked injury or subject matter jurisdiction (standing). The plaintiffs failed to provide any facts that could support the allegation that defendant Obama was not a natural born Citizen because Purpura had not discovered The Natural Law Theory of the Father. Purpura was relying upon only the Unity Theory which by 59 above does not establish a fact. The only other avenue left for Purpura was to establish that the PPACA will apply to Purpura and create an injury. Due to his age, income, and other benefits to which he is entitled, the court could not find any facts to support the notion that the Act would even apply to Purpura, so they could not see how it affected him in order to create an injury.

Understandably then, they never addressed the issues raised in point number 6 of Purpura’s petition that made the claim that defendant Obama was not a natural born Citizen, as there was never any evidence to support this claim that was ever introduced by any party in the suit. Purpura alleged in his complaint that he was also bringing his suit on behalf of his fellow citizens. The discovery of the objective definition of natural born Citizen indicates that the effect of defendant Obama not being a natural born Citizen is to disenfranchise male U.S. citizens, as a separate political class from the female citizens, which is an Equal Protection violation of political equality between male and female citizens for which the objective definition was meant to create and establish a protection in Article II. This protection prevents an inequity between male and female citizens by preventing the establishment of two separate political classes, one a Noble class (females) and one a commoner class (males). Therefore, by claiming that defendant Obama was not a natural born Citizen, without any facts to support, Purpura was essentially pretending to represent a class action law suit, which only an attorney can bring and represent. Purpura was a non-attorney pro-se litigant. If Purpura had discovered the Natural Law Theory of the Father, then he would have realized as plaintiff Guthrie realizes that he can only bring his own case for his own injury on his own behalf as a member of his political class of males who are injured by defendant Obama. Each member of this new political class (commoner male citizens) that is created by the defendants named in this petition can bring their own suit. If they all want to bring a class action suit then they can hire an attorney and bring one.

78) The facts related in 77 above indicate a reason for plaintiff Guthrie to be concerned that he is about to suffer an injury to his rights of due process and even physical safety since now Guthrie has objective proof of the definition of natural born Citizen that requires no additional paper trail evidence (birth certificate), since one only needs the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the rules of jurisprudence, and your reason and five senses to discover whether or not defendant Obama is qualified to hold his Title and Office. There are only three possible options: (1) the defendant’s Positive Law Theory, which violates 51b above, (2) the Unity Theory, of Purpura v. Sebelius, No. 11-2303 (3d Cir. Sept. 29, 2011), 132 U.S. 1631(2012) rehearing denied, Kerchner v. Obama, 612 F.3d 204 (2010), Taitz v. Obama, 707 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) and all the 100 plus other plaintiff cases, which violate both 51a and 51 b above, or (3) The Natural Law Theory of the Father.

79) Upon filing his case, plaintiff Guthrie is going to automatically run into resistance from those who have much to lose financially and political by having the truth exposed. Before he even files, plaintiff Guthrie realizes that this case is headed for the Supreme Court of the United States of America and that there are two members already of that court who are not legitimate and who have a lot to lose by having the truth come out. Plaintiff Guthrie does not even know if this case will be given to a district judge who is not a magistrate judge, but instead is an Article III judge, and whether or not the judge assigned will be an appointee of the defendant Obama. Plaintiff Guthrie is already suffering an infringement upon his rights of due process by the fear and intimidation caused by a predicted backlash from the defendants and from the society of privileged supporters of King Obama who might even become violent towards the plaintiff Guthrie for the mere offense of speaking the truth and attempting to use his due process rights in order to obtain his Liberty and Freedom and Justice which are just his rights that he is due.

80) Due to the facts stated in 79 above, plaintiff Guthrie has been living in fear for over 4 years, like a Jewish person under Hitler in the 1930’s and 1940’s, afraid to come out and speak the truth and obtain his citizenship rights, and thus other rights of his native society, for fear of bringing the wrath and societal violence upon himself that is being caused by the privileged political society of King Obama and his government, the named defendants.

81) If the courts and defendants do not immediately recognize plaintiff Guthrie’s rights and discovery, and move to protect him from the government of King Obama and his society of privileged followers, then both the courts and the defendants will cross the line from a civil conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his citizenship status and rights, and will then be engaged in a knowing and purposeful conspiracy to commit fraud in order to deprive the plaintiff Guthrie of his rights, which is a criminal act, and is also a civil act of libel against plaintiff Guthrie. Will plaintiff Guthrie and others in his condition then have to flee for their lives, like a Jewish person in the 1930’s or 1940’s, and seek political asylum in a foreign country? Or will he be enslaved in his own country under a foreign military occupation that operates totally under false color of law? How is that any different than living under Hitler? If plaintiff flees to a foreign country, how is he going to survive? The plaintiff Guthrie is already 51 years old and is very poor with no friends or relatives to turn to in order to help him escape America. Where is he going to get the money to buy his freedom and safety? How is he going to convince a foreign government to grant him political asylum with Secretary of State and defendant Hillary Clinton maintaining the fraudulent illusion that both she and defendant Obama hold a lawful warrant to their titles and positions? In effect, both the defendant Clinton along with the rest of the defendants are conspiring to maintain the illusion which robs plaintiff Guthrie of his credibility and reputation and citizenship rights, and traps plaintiff Guthrie in America as a slave and prisoner of a foreign government and power that is criminal in its very nature, just like Nazi Germany under Hitler.

Subsection 3 (Count 3)

Government as an Established Religion

King Obama’s and Queen Ann Dunham’s Royal Noble Appointments, and the establishment of a Monarchy by Mr. Obama, State and Federal actors, and Congress’s free will actions without the consent of the People establishes the three branches of government to be a Religion that ties the State and Church together as one political entity in violation of the First Amendment prohibitions against interfering with the natural rights of conscience by preventing the establishment of religion or establishing government to be a religion that one is compelled to worship.

82) Petitioner Paul Guthrie is an Atheist who objectively believes in Natural Law and the Laws of Nature, not the subjective belief in God, to be the source of authority that governs mankind’s moral and ethical behavior according to a natural order or rule of Law, not according to opinion (subjective belief), belief in supernatural realms and deities (God, a subjective belief), or arbitrary rule by man (King Obama and his government’s subjective beliefs and criminal use of positive law authority).

83) A king’s sources of authority for his claim of artificial sovereign political authority, or the legal right claim to be the political head of state for the country or countries via his offspring made with foreign females, are the subjective beliefs in both violent unlawful force known as Might makes Right, and in forced faith, opinion and a belief in God, called The Divine Right of Kings.

84) Due to 83 above, the U.S. citizen is required to accept that King Obama is God’s chosen messenger upon Earth with regard to secular and religious political matters of the society and state, which necessarily requires one to believe in God, given that King Obama has no legitimate natural source of native U.S. sovereign political authority to point to in order to objectively prove just what source of political authority entitles him to a lawful claim of a natural right to the Office of President of the United States.

85) Due to 83 and 84 above and incorporating the findings in Subsection 2, the U.S. citizen Atheist is required to live in fear of violence perpetrated by the government or society in response to bringing a grievance or disobeying a non-law, or else must believe in God in order to accept that the government is legitimate and belongs to the People and that the laws are valid and must be obeyed.

86) Due to 83 through 85 above, petitioner Paul Guthrie who is an Atheist, is required to worship and view King Obama and his government to be God in order to accept that the laws are legitimate and must be obeyed. Guthrie dare not make a public ruckus and expose the truth and try to secure his rights of conscience, or else he might have to endure the wrath of King Obama and his government and their irrational ignorant religious followers who have no clue what a natural born Citizen is and don’t care anyway. This is a violation of the First Amendment prohibitions against establishing forced religion, as this establishes government to be the religion that all must worship, under the threat of force and physical violence by the society and government, in order to obey the rules and codes with a clear conscience, or to be physically protected, or able to secure any rights. This constitutes an insufferable injury to plaintiffs’ natural rights of conscience, not to mention his natural right and legal right to be safe from attack by foreign religious political forces within his own country and robbed of his rights and citizenship benefits. Guthrie’s rights of conscience that guarantee him an objective standard natural order (rule of law) to be recognized as the basis of law and Justice are meant to be secured and protected in the First Amendment, and are meant to be secured by the definition of natural born Citizen as being according to the U.S. State citizen father. This protects Mr. Guthrie’s right to be an Atheist and to live by, and exercise his objective beliefs, which includes the recognition in positive law of the natural right to a standard of Law so that he may determine to be governed by an objective rule of law, which is essential in order for him to be able to secure his Atheism. That protection already exists and is already supposed to be provided to him in the discovered objective definition of natural born Citizen that is codified into the Organic law (Article II). If only people would recognize it and enforce it, then plaintiff Guthrie could have his natural right to the free exercise of his entitled beliefs (Atheism) permitted to resume unmolested, that has been unlawfully interfered with by the ongoing actions of the defendants.

87) Although plaintiff Mr. Guthrie is stating an injury to his rights of conscience concerning objective views and beliefs, as a result of 83 through 86 above, we can identify other religious groups that will be affected and could suffer injury by being forced to worship other gods (government) before their own Gods, which would be an injury to the religious person’s right to his or her subjective beliefs. This shows that the Church and State have combined into one under King Obama. As a result of the actions of the defendants, which is a conspiracy to commit a violation of the Separation of Church and State Doctrine of the First Amendment, not only is Guthrie robbed of the free exercise and enjoyment of his rights of conscience, but as soon as others learn what is going on by Guthrie’s filing, then they too will be enslaved to a foreign religion. Then, as long as the courts and defendants refuse to recognize and accept the truth and law and to accept defeat, they will be engaging in a provable criminal conspiracy to combine Religion and Monarchy in order to interfere with the free rights of conscience of the people, in violation of the First Amendment.

Subsection 4 (Count 4)

Slavery

The foreign government and foreign power of King Obama and his Monarchal Religious government forces the U.S. citizen taxpayer into Taxation without Representation which is involuntary servitude, the very essence of slavery banned by the 13th Amendment.

88) Plaintiff Paul Guthrie is a pauper. He is too poor to owe any taxes. He is not a taxpayer at this time and is not even required to file a return because he earns under the minimum requirement for tax filing.

89) In order to secure his Liberty and not be subject to the slavery of involuntary servitude to a foreign government that is not his government, plaintiff Guthrie has been forced to remain impoverished in order to secure his political freedom and personal liberty, or else not pay taxes that he does not owe to a foreign government and hope they don’t persecute him for a crime that is not a crime and for which they have no rightful authority to prosecute him. If plaintiff Guthrie should some day earn enough to be required to file and pay taxes, and he then tries to defend himself against the IRS and raises the truth of the objective definition of natural born Citizen, which is a positive defense, he would then run afoul of the injuries raised earlier in Subsection 2, or be subject to ridicule and attacks upon his character and reputation by the government via IRS proceedings, due to the illusion of legitimacy that the wrongful actions of the defendants are causing.

90) Due to 89 above, the plaintiff Paul Guthrie and all U.S. citizen tax payers are forced to suffer the intolerable injury of being extorted by the King and his government and forced into involuntary servitude via Taxation without Representation to have to give the fruits of their labor to a foreign government and power without their consent, or remain impoverished to avoid this unpatriotic duty and avoid the physical threats to one’s personal safety, name, and reputation as directed at Guthrie unlawfully by the defendants, and unjustly by his society, which prevents him from establishing a credible reputation like other normal people.

Subsection 5 (Count 5)

Hate Crime and Slavery

Discrimination based upon objective belief in the rule of Law.

How the term “birther” and the actions of the defendants are discriminatory terms and actions based upon gender (being a male), national identity (natural born Citizen definition), and religious views (Atheism or the objective belief in the rule of law) that have the effect of segregating and isolating the natural born Citizen from his rightful native political society and the rights that are secured by that society. This is a Hate Crime by definition in the Hate crime laws of the U.S. The effect is to deny any name or reputation of authority or credibility as a male representative spokesperson of the native political society, which prevents the natural born Citizen male or female from being able to secure his or her right to Freedom, Liberty, Justice, and
Equality. This is total slavery, banned by the 13th Amendment and banned by the plaintiff’s Indiana State Constitution. Both prohibit slavery and involuntary servitude except for the punishment of a crime that one has been duly convicted.

91) King Obama, his supporters, the three branches of government, and the Popular Press and News Media coin or use the term “birther” as a label to attach to people like Plaintiff Paul Guthrie, which is an insulting label meant to devalue the reputation of the person and his citizenship rights by discrediting anything a “birther” says regarding the fact that Mr. Obama is not a natural born Citizen and so is not eligible to hold Office.

92) One earns the distinction as a ‘birther’ by publicly telling the truth that Obama is not a natural born Citizen, exposing oneself to public ridicule by publicly acting like a person who believes that we are supposed to be under a Constitutional  government that is limited by the acceptance of Nature and Her Natural Laws, and that we are supposed to be governed by the rule of that law, and that everyone is supposed to be equal and no one is supposed to be above the law. That is enough to be branded and stigmatized with the label “birther” by the government, by the public at large, and by the popular Press and News outlets, and so be disinherited of one’s citizenship.

93) The purpose in society of the actions described in 91 and 92 above is a political purpose that has the effect of ostracizing the “birther” from his lawful political society by creating the illusion that anyone who says that Obama is not a natural born Citizen is wrong because everyone knows that Obama was born in Hawaii, as if the place of birth was relevant, which it is not. This false set of choices [either (1) The Positive Law Theory of the government based upon Hawaiian birth, or (2) The Unity Theory (Birtherism) based upon place of birth (Kenya) and both parents being U.S. citizens (father Kenyan)] is false because the illusion is that there is not a third choice, which of course is (3) The Natural Law Theory of the Father, which has nothing at all to do with the place of birth of the offspring or the political condition of the mother, as was intended by the Constitution and is indicated by the Title of Nobility prohibitions and how they operate upon Article II as detailed in 51a and 5 lb above. The effect of not disclosing the true and correct definition and meaning of natural born Citizen as properly described by The Natural Law Theory of the Father is that of disinheriting the U.S. natural born Citizen ‘birther’ of his credibility and inherited ancestry, Freedom, and Liberty by denying him the public recognition of his rightful government. This recognition is essential for the natural born Citizen to secure his political equality and reputation. The denial is accomplished by the refusal to recognize the natural born Citizen status to be a function of birth to a native State citizen father, by equating natural born status with the place of birth only, which defeats the purpose and applicability of the Constitution as identified in points 49 and 50 above. This makes the natural born Citizen to be treated legally identical to those who were taken from Africa during the slave trade era of American history. Those who were taken were deprived of their lawful native rights and government that their native fathers had provided to protect their children, and were taken away and only recognized as natives of a foreign political society (Africa) but who were now subject to a foreign authority that denied recognition of State citizenship in order to keep them slaves, without recourse to laws for the protection of their political rights. Slaves have no political rights recognized, that is why they are slaves. The term ‘birther’ serves the same purpose, function, and effect in society, to deny rights and to separate slave people non-citizens from Royal privileged political people citizens or institutions (defendants), and to deny the native people non-citizen slave political society any right to citizenship or a government, and thus deny them any ability to secure Freedom, Justice, and Equality, the political and societal rights such as those in the Royal political society have.

94) Ever since the unlawful selection of King Obama and his conveyance into the Office of President, the natural born Citizen ‘birther’ has been and continues to be a slave without a government, who is outside of the political arena and law due to his beliefs, not based upon skin color, but based upon objective belief in the rule of Law. Those who continue to attach the stigma ‘birther’ are seen to be purposefully acting to libel and harm and keep the U.S. natural born Citizen ‘birther’ ostracized and enslaved to the arbitrary unlawful violent authority of a foreign government and power. The effectiveness of this new discriminatory term ‘birther’ in depriving the native natural born U.S. Citizen of the benefits of his native government is seen to be extremely effective, given that after over 100 attempts in court and over 4 years, the natural born U.S. Citizen ‘birther’ still does not have his Freedom and Liberty, Due Process of Law, or Government back.

95) For the reasons stated above in 91 through 94, plaintiff Paul Guthrie, who is a natural born U.S. Citizen, has been for a long time and is currently suffering the political right injury of slavery and being deprived of his natural rights of citizenship, by the actions of the defendants, rights that are meant to be recognized and protected under the Constitution, which only come from the recognition by the defendants of plaintiffs male State citizen father as the source of an inherited right to U.S. citizenship and State citizenship. This is just like how, in the southern States, the black male father slave was denied State citizenship to pass on to his offspring, and therefore deprived of his ability to secure his rightful Freedom and Liberty for himself or for his offspring. The inability of the black slave and of plaintiff Paul Guthrie to secure their political Liberty, Freedom, Justice and Equality to be recognized as coming from a State citizen father is caused by the same type of force that affected the black slave. The recognition of his citizenship status is being denied to plaintiff Paul Guthrie, by an organized opposed counter political force, a political force (of Noble Title) which has achieved this goal in our times today with the unlawful help of Congress (in ignoring the Title of Nobility prohibitions), and by the use of invented divisive political labels such as ‘birther’, and by promulgating other violent deceitful tactics and propaganda over time against the ‘birther’ in the courts and public arena.
96) All branches of government, with the support of King Obama’s privileged entourage, have violated both the State and Federal Titles of Nobility provisions of the Constitution and have granted a Title of Nobility to Obama’s U.S. citizen mother so that she could pass on an artificial sovereign political authority of positive law to her foreign-born U.S. citizen child (a foreign father makes the child a foreign-born natural born citizen of Kenya, regardless of the place of birth of the offspring or citizenship of the mother), who could only then inherit the privilege created by the three branches in the 2008 selection of King to be President. Apparently in Congress’ omniscience, they thought they could issue a Title of Nobility that could travel back in time and confer upon Queen Ann Dunham to pass onto Obama. Or was it just created in 2008 by the Royal Protectorate Society of Hawaii (place of birth) that apparently, to everyone’s surprise, is a State that does not have to go by the Constitution and can grant Titles of Nobility to anyone born on their soil territory jurisdiction? The only other alternative is that it was known in 1961 that baby Obama would need a Title of Nobility in 2008, so either Congress or the new State of Hawaii granted the Title of Nobility in 1961 to Ann Dunham in secret, unbeknown to anyone at the time (this would explain why we can’t see the original birth certificate) so that she could pass that on to baby Barack so that he could be President in 2008.

97) The above points 91 though 96, prove that Mr. Guthrie is not a racist and that Mr. Guthrie is neither a slave non-citizen nor “birther” non-citizen slave, but instead is himself enslaved and injured as a natural born US. Citizen by being labeled the latter by the government and society, in order to justify being treated like the former by King Obama, his government, and his Royal privileged society of followers (defendants and society at large).

Subsection 6 (Count 6)

The effects upon the U.S. Military of the refusal by government to recognize Natural Law Authority

The Monarchy-Religious government of King Obama has eliminated civilian control over the military, and now power and authority has been transferred to the upper echelons of the military that are now a rogue military force that can secretly do whatever they want.

98) Since Mr. Obama is only a natural born citizen (of someplace, probably Kenya) and a naturalized U.S. citizen, not a natural born Citizen, the Monarchy government that is created by his unlawful conveyance and maintenance into power represents a dilemma for the military person who is contracted active duty military under U.S. military service. [see Officer’s Oath by Terry Lakin, ISBN-13:9780578086644, Publisher: Paperclip Press, Publication date: June 15, 2012, the story of the Court Marshal of Col. Terry Lakin.]

99) For the U.S. military person, waking up and realizing that Mr. Obama is a King and not a President is like waking up one morning and discovering that you have been shanghaied into a foreign king’s army without your consent having been obtained.

100) Due to 99 above, the aware Patriotic U.S. citizen member of the military, who has taken an oath to uphold and defend the government created by the Constitution, feels a compulsion to get out of the foreign king’s army and back into the native army, an army created by the Constitution via the definition and meaning of Article II natural born Citizen with which he or she contracted.

101) Due to 99 and 100 above, the aware military person has only two options in order to solve this dilemma, either to violate his oath to the legitimate government of the Constitution and thus his conscience so as to stay in this military in order to secure his retirement benefits and income or to get out of the military, neither of which are appealing propositions, because the person cannot disobey orders without punishment and repercussions. He has the right to disobey, but not the power to disobey without repercussions, as long as the military unlawfully keeps him under the King’s dominion.

102) Due to 99 through 101 above, the aware U.S. military person is forced to seek recognition from the appropriate authority that his or her original contract was with a different government than the one that is in power, and therefore, his or her contract has been voluntarily broken by the government of the Constitutional
military, and thus is void in the king’s army, and he or she should be released from their obligations, or else he or she will have to seek political asylum in a jurisdiction that can protect him or her from serving in the King’s army.

103) Since there is no longer any lawful civilian control over the military under King Obama, the power and control over the military must go someplace, governed by the Law of Nature alone, if not by positive law authority.

104) Due to 103, the rightful power and control over the U.S. military is either with the military itself minus King Obama and Congress, or it has been transferred to some other one of the People who are the rightful Constitutional overseers of the military. The rightful power and control has been wrongly placed in the hands of the defendant Dempsey which is why he has been named in this suit.

105) The plaintiff Paul Guthrie is a natural born Citizen who has inherited a native natural sovereign political authority from a native State citizen father.

106) Due to 105 above, the plaintiff Guthrie is one of the People that the Constitution is created for, which gives him the right to take control of the government and military in a lawful manner via due process of law, when the government abdicates its duties and responsibilities, which gives him the right to file this petition and be punted the relief sought.

107) The Congress, Executive and Judicial branches of the Constitutional government of the United States and defendant Holder have completely and totally abdicated their Constitutionally-obliged lawful duties and responsibilities for over 4 years now and are still refusing to be bound to the Constitution and the rule of law. The defendants are no longer constituted as a Representative body of the People, and haven’t been for some time, by their own voluntary will and actions without the authority or consent of the People.

108) The truth of this fact stated in 107 above is self-evident by the very fact of reality that, in over 100 U.S. court cases in over 4 years since even before Obama’s selection in 2008, no one has been able to discover the definition and meaning of natural born Citizen, given that King Obama and his Monarchal-Religious government are obviously still in power.

109) Due to 108 above, plaintiff has no choice but to conclude that the entire Nation must consist either of stupidly or willfully ignorant fools, or of those who are under the influence of some form of mass delusion, hypnotic trance, or threat of violence.

110) As a result of 98 through 109, plaintiff has no choice but to conclude that it is the Patriotic duty of the first person who discovers the true meaning and definition of Article II natural born Citizen to file a petition with the Court, so as to break the spell and illusion, that all may take cognizance of the situation, in order to apply the Constitution to protect the U.S. citizen from being defined by the government’s actions to be a George Washington! In fact, Title 18 U.S.C. § 2382 Misprision of Treason and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 Misprision of Felony compel Guthrie forward into Court to inform them of his discovery or else he could be guilty of crimes himself.

111) Plaintiff Mr. Paul Guthrie did not ask to be a George Washington and does not want to be a George Washington.

112) By filing this petition, plaintiff Paul Guthrie is establishing a public record that he is the first natural born Citizen person in the country to rightfully file a claim in Court that establishes objectively in Nature, as a self-evident truth of Nature, what the objective definition and meaning of Article II natural born Citizen is, which is a matter of objective truth, and not plaintiffs opinion, nor anyone’s opinion, opinion being only subjective truth and hearsay evidence.

113) Mr. Guthrie proves by his filing of this petition that he is the only person in the country who understands how the government and law is supposed to function, making Mr. Guthrie the last surviving natural US. sovereign political authority of the country. This is because you cannot claim to have inherited a natural U.S. sovereign political authority if you don’t even know what one is and where it comes from. It is obviously that no one in the country besides plaintiff Guthrie knows, given that so many have been trying to determine it for years now and we still have a King and Monarchy form a government, and not a President and Constitutional Republic of the People.

114) Due to 98 through 113 above, Mr. Guthrie fears that those who are seeking to leave King Obama’s army and repatriate themselves with the proper Constitutional government of We the People will turn to Mr. Guthrie to lead them like a George Washington, since by his public filing he is showing the world that he is the only person in the country with sufficient legal, scientific, historic knowledge who is not under the spell of mass hypnosis of the King and his government, who knows what a natural born Citizen is, and what the Constitution means, and how the government is supposed to function.

115) As a result of 114 above, plaintiff Mr. Guthrie is made to suffer a political right injury and lose the benefit of the rule of law and its protection, and is made subject to arbitrary unlawful powers and authority that he does not want and does not deserve. This injury is caused by the courts’ and Congress’s unlawful refusal to recognize and be bound by the Natural Law jurisdiction and authority of the Constitution which is fully defined in the Article II natural born Citizen Clause by both Intent and Political Context, and by Nature and Her Laws. (see the Definitions section above) [natural fact note, evidence: Nature’s political laws, Declaration of Independence: Governments are created by males, and the Constitution: “We the People” which includes the male citizens who naturally create the goverment since males are naturally territorial creatures who define the political boundaries of a society. It is not the females, who are at a natural disadvantage when it comes to defending any claimed territory or enforcing rules and regulations, so they do not define the secular political boundaries of a country unless they are Queens. Females only naturally define membership for the offspring in a religious political society, the family of mankind. Females naturally fight to protect their children and husbands, males naturally fight to protect their adult females and offspring by defining and protecting some territory and establishing rules within the territory in order that they can protect the females and offspring from foreign males. This is why in the natural state, males create the government not females. This is what is being related by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence as a Law of Nature or Natural Law, a ‘self-evident’ truth.]

116) Mr. Guthrie resents having this duty thrust upon him and should not even have to be in the Court wasting their time and his, as he would not have any injuries if the three branches were just doing their job and enforcing the Constitution and living by the laws that they all took an oath to uphold and defend and to live by. (an oath to uphold and defend both Positive Law and Natural Law) But it seems that one cannot uphold, defend, enforce, and live by that which no one in the three branches of government or among the populace even knows what it means.

117) Due to all facts incorporated above in this petition and as a result of the actions of the defendants, plaintiff Guthrie notes that he finds himself in a similar predicament to that of Jesus from the Bible. Like Jesus’ predicament in the Bible, Guthrie finds himself in the position of coming into the court of Caesar due to the irresponsible actions of zealot religious subjective believers in the Royal privileged political society of Obama, and by analogy when Guthrie speaks the truth and reveals that he has committed no offense under the Roman civil code, the angry mob wants Guthrie’s head for daring to defy the religious authorities of the privileged religious political society of Obama. If the Court should refuse to take and hear this case and refuse to grant the plaintiff the relief requested, then they will replay the role of the Roman Civil Authorities who failed to protect Jesus from Crucifixion. Guthrie prays the Court will protect him and not make that same mistake, as he resents being put in this position by the irresponsible actions of the defendants and the privileged Royal political worship society of King/God Obama supporters. This filing is putting everyone on notice, that once notified of the objective definition and meaning of natural born Citizen, if everyone does not take note of it and cease and desist immediately, then one might well lose the protection of the law and will appear to be engaging in an open criminal treasonous conspiracy to deprive Guthrie and those of his political class of their rights and freedom. Any who do not accept and comply with the facts presented in this court filing, once they are made aware of the facts, who will not cease and desist their actions that are causing Guthrie’s injuries, might well be opening themselves up to claims of further libelous injury committed against Guthrie, now that the facts are established.

Subsection 7 (Count 7)

The Denial of Due Process

Loss of recognition of inherited citizenship status as a natural native sovereign political authority of the country (Article II natural born Citizen status) is a violation of plaintiffs rights to due process of law under both the U.S. Constitution and also under plaintiffs Indiana State constitution.

118) The incorporation of all points and sections above, and the injuries to the plaintiff that they describe, proves that the U.S. government (three branches) and most of her People (who are the fourth branch of government) do not and will not recognize the status natural born and the citizenship rights of natural born U.S. Citizens. (offspring of State citizen fathers, hence capitol ‘C!)

119) The facts stated in 117 along with the injuries that are described in full in the petition above, particularly the facts stated at 53, 60, 66, 68, 76, 81, 86, 90, 95, 97, and 117, prove conclusively that as a matter of law and reality in the U.S., those natural born Citizen ‘birthers’ like plaintiff Guthrie, who are aware of what is going on, are in fact legally total Political, Economic, and Societal Slaves, legally identical to the black non-citizen slaves in the old South, or Jewish non-citizen people trapped under Hitler in Nazi Germany in the 1930’s or 1940’s. Mr. Guthrie is not able to have his citizenship recognized by the government so that he can be protected by the Constitution and laws, and the same was true of black non-citizen slaves, or Jewish non-citizen persons under Hitler, which is what defined them as being legally slaves or societal pariahs. Just like a black non-citizen slave, or a Jewish non-citizen slave under Hitler, Mr. Guthrie, as a ‘birther’, has no recognized political representation in the society, is forced without his consent to live in fear of speaking out, and must give the fruits of his labor (taxes if he owed them) to a foreign governmental authority that is not Mr. Guthrie’s native government, under threat of fines and imprisonment if he does not comply with the unlawful demands of King Obama’s government.

120) The above fact, and facts stated in 119, show that Mr. Guthrie and other natural born Citizens of the United States are being deprived of their citizenship status, rights, Liberty and Freedom, and their Political rights to Justice and Equality, and are being treated like outcast pariahs, without any due process of law as required under the various Amendments to the Constitution that guarantee that rights will not be taken without due process of law. Due process of law does not mean that Mr. Guthrie can be demoted from natural born Citizen to political slave non-citizen by candidate Obama declaring his unlawful intention to run for Office. Nor can Mr. Guthrie be demoted by the State Secretaries of State deciding on their own authority to override the Titles of Nobility provisions in the Constitution to create a Monarchy and Noble political class among only the female U.S. citizens. Nor can Mr. Guthrie be demoted by Congress on their own authority, without consent given to override the Titles of Nobility provisions and without power granted in the Constitution. The actions of the defendants declare Mr. Obama to be the first privilege of positive law President, in order to convey him and maintain him in the People’s Office of President and fool people, hiding from them the truth that instead, he really is the first Royal American King and now you are King Obama’s and his government’s slave, just ‘subjects’ of the privileged Royal society of political supporters and worshipers of King/God Obama. Where is the due process of law occurring in these processes just described which justifies plaintiffs enslavement? Plaintiff Paul Guthrie has looked at his Constitution and the laws of the Country and can find no authority for this given anywhere, and he is certain that he has not committed or been accused and convicted of any crime. Even the worst felon prisoner in the United States has more rights than plaintiff Paul Guthrie. The only difference between them is the size of their prison boxes. At least the felon prisoner either is not a natural born Citizen and so does not care, or is unaware of his political condition, has not yet been branded a ‘birther’, and thus believes he has rights that in fact he does not have under King Mama and his government.

121) Although plaintiff Mr. Guthrie is a male descendant of early Scots settlers in the United States, his ancestry hails from Scotland and Danish Viking ancestry via his birth father, and Jewish inheritance from his birth mother.

122) Mr. Guthrie checked through his ancestry and is certain that no one on either side of his relatives, going far back in time, were ever involved in the establishment and maintenance of the American black slave trade. Indeed his own ancestry is one of Scots heritage and Jewish heritage, who themselves were always being enslaved by kings of England, or Egypt, or Europe, all throughout history, which is how and why plaintiffs ancestors fled to the United States in the first place to escape religious persecution and political enslavement. This is how plaintiff became a natural born U.S. Citizen, and is why he is here before the Court now.

123) Due to 122 above, it is safe to conclude that we have established that plaintiff Mr. Guthrie is not being punished for any crimes committed by his fleeing immigrant poor white U.S. State citizen ancestors against black males from Africa who were brought to the United Sates as slaves, by and for the benefit of the mostly wealthy white male descendants or business political allies of British Royalty.

124) Due to 123 above, which shows that Mr. Guthrie is not guilty of any crime by way of his ancestors, and due to the fact that plaintiff Mr. Guthrie has not been charged, tried, or convicted, of any crime himself today, or since before the selection of King Obama, which warrants punishment, Mr. Guthrie cannot find any reason why defendants Obama, Congress, and the society at large, think that Mr. Guthrie, who is a natural born Citizen male who has committed no offense, is deserving of the punishment of involuntary servitude (slavery) for not committing any offense himself or via his ancestors, other than relying upon objective truth for his moral and ethical behavior (Atheism) to objectively determine for himself what his form of government is (Republic, not fascist religious monarchy) and to objectively determine what rights under the Constitution he has, and to come to Court to claim them for himself, as is his right and his duty by statutory compulsion of the criminal code that applies to Guthrie. By what objective right do Mr. Obama, the three branches of government, and the society of King Obama’s privileged popular supporters and followers have that gives them the lawful objective authority to deprive plaintiff Mr. Guthrie of this right just mentioned, and also to deprive him of his Political rights, Economic rights, Spiritual and Religious rights, Liberty and Freedom, Justice and Equality rights by denying him the recognition and protection of his natural born status?

125) All points in this petition up to 124, taken together objectively prove conclusively (self-evident truth) that plaintiff Mr. Guthrie and others who are the aware natural born Citizens, have unlawfully had the benefits of their citizenship status of natural born Citizen identity stripped from them, and thereby they have lost every benefit that society and government provides to this political class of citizen. This has happened for no other reason but for the voluntary willful organized political gain of the States’ Secretaries of State, defendant Congress, and defendant Obama and his political society and citizen supporters, who have engaged in a naked and open act of unlawful aggression against plaintiff Mr. Guthrie which has overthrown his native Constitutional government and enslaved Guthrie and others of his native political society, and is also a naked act of aggression and power grab by those actors against the Constitutional government
of the United States and the States, in order to alter its form of government and control it for a foreign power (males from Kenya, or some other foreign power, we are not sure) which is High Treason against the United States of America by definition.

126) Given that there has been a succession of Presidents starting with George Bush, Sr., and then continuing with President Clinton and Bush Jr., all calling for a New World Order and One World Government, it would appear that those who could not have their way previously by finding the political support to Amend the Constitution to admit the political class of offspring of foreign fathers [see: Congressional records re: the numerous attempts to alter or amend the natural born Citizen provisions in recent history], have taken it upon themselves to establish a precedent that will create Titles of Nobility among the female U.S. citizen population to permit them to pass on an artificial sovereign political authority that will enable the offspring of foreign fathers and U.S. citizen mothers to become President and thereby create a monarchy, which is their One World Government and New World Order, because then any male citizen from any political society or from any country who is wealthy enough can just impregnate a U.S. citizen female, or come to the U.S. with his foreign wife who is pregnant to give birth to their offspring on U.S. soil territorial jurisdiction, birthing offspring who will be entitled to be President but also entitled to citizenship as a native citizen of another political society. Next, the Congress can now just use these newly-acquired powers that are obtained by ignoring the Titles of Nobility provisions, and declare all offspring who are natives of other societies to be natural born citizens (positive law lower-case ‘c’ citizens) of the U.S. society who can be President, since that essentially is what has occurred for defendant Obama’s benefit. After awhile, all other countries will have their population full of native foreign citizens born to be U.S. natural born citizens at birth (as a function of positive law definitions only) who can be President of the United States of Planet Earth by established precedent, and then you have your One World political state society and government that those before Obama have advocated for, and Mr. Obama and the courts have delivered by default and are establishing with precedent.

127) The above points 1 through 126 taken together and including the definitions sections, indicate an unlawful enterprise being perpetrated by the defendants, designed to deny and prevent the Constitutional guarantees and protections that creates Mr. Guthrie to be a free natural born political member (citizen) of the society (from a State of the union) who is the offspring of a politically free person (State citizen father) and is entitled to political, economic, spiritual and religious freedom, and liberty and justice, under the Constitution of the United States and the State Constitutions, and not to be subject to the see-saw political condition of living under a monarchy and king if it is socially popular and under a sovereign Republic of natural sovereign People when he is lucky. The above points 1 through 126 taken together and incorporated with the definitions sections, proves that plaintiff Mr. Guthrie and other so called ‘birthee citizens like him who are members of his same political class of natural born U.S. Citizens, have had their political rights and identity in the society stripped by Mr. Obama and his government (the three branches) without any due process of law, and to heap insult upon injury, the privileged society of King Obama call Mr. Guthrie a ‘blither’ to justify their abuses heaped upon the plaintiff, Mr. Guthrie, and upon his rightful Constitutional government, and upon those like him who are objective thinkers and are objectively aware of reality which the law requires and entitles and compels.

Subsection 8

Standing

128) The Constitution and codes of the United States provide authority to hear this case in Article III, Section 2, and under other Titles, by granting authority to the courts to hear all matters regarding one of the natural born Citizens of the United States against a State, or against the United States, or both, regarding Law and Equity issues that arise under the Constitution of the United States or under State constitutions, which also includes issues that arise due to offenses against the Law of Nature or Natural Law which is the subject matter before the court, as this case concerns injuries that arise under all three jurisdictions, Law, Equity, and Natural Law, under both Federal and State constitutions. In most cases the immunity of government would shield the defendants but in this instance the defendants have no lawful authority to claim their offices and are committing fraud and conspiracy to conceal that fact so plaintiff Guthrie fails to see how the defendants can be immune from suit.

[NBC: Uh, nope… that is not what the constitution provides for.]

129) This case in controversy is unique in the History of the United States which makes it a case of first impression, since never before has it happened and been discovered, during tenure of the Office in the History of the United States, that someone has become President who was not born to a U.S. citizen, State citizen father. And also because for the first time in 222 years we have a chance to establish an objective definition and meaning to our Constitution and case laws via the discovered objective defmition of natural born Citizen.

130) Due to 1 through 127 above including the Definitions sections, plaintiffs injury to his political rights is concrete and specific, a particular and not a general grievance, nor a general grievance or complaint that affects everyone equally. The above points 1 through 127 prove that the injuries that are occurring are varied and widespread due to the nature of the fraud involved, but affect different groups of people of different political classes of citizens differently. For example, males and females are now members of two different political classes, Nobility females and commoner males, who each are unequal politically, as one (the male natural born Citizen who is now a minority) is bound to the political barriers of the country’s borders by his citizenship, and the female citizen and other naturalized foreigners (who are the majority) are not politically bound by the country’s borders. Nor is the Atheist protected from the followers of kings who believe in the subjective arbitrary rule of man and God and not in the objective rule of law. Nor is there protection for the politically aware who knows he has an injury, versus the politically unaware who is clueless that he is enslaved, nor is there protection of the Jewish person or Christian person who must now worship other gods before their God. Nor is there protection of the political rights of the natural born Citizens versus the political rights of the naturalized citizens. There are now all kinds of subset groups that are each pitted against the other, and being affected all in different ways and all in one similar way (enslavement) –which is not a justification for the government to deny standing by claiming that everyone is enslaved equally and thus the complaint is a general grievance that affects everyone equally and thus lacks standing. That is not true because Mr. Obama and the Congress and Obama’s privileged class of followers and supporters are not enslaved U.S. citizens because they are not ‘birthers’. Therefore the injuries declared as facts in this petition are not affecting everyone, or every citizen equally.

131) The case must be granted standing and taken up because now that defendant Obama has been selected to another and final term (we may only hope, seeing as the Constitution does not seem to apply to him), if he is not discovered and removed and punished for his actions before his term expires, then a precedent will have been established that will cause the plaintiff and other ‘birthers’ like him to lose the recognition and protection of their political rights forever, rights that are meant to be secured by the Constitution. The future natural born Citizens will forever be politically subject to the see-saw political condition of being a slave under a king and monarchal-religion when it is deemed by society to be popular, and under a sovereign Republic of sovereign citizens when the plaintiff(s) are lucky and get rule by the law of the Constitution when the society decides to be benevolent and obey the rules.

132) For the reasons and authorities stated in 128 through 131, and for the clear and obvious stated injuries related in 61 through 127 and incorporating the Definitions sections, the Court has standing to hear and judge the case on its merits of facts and law that are stated, and issue the relief that is sought by the Plaintiff(s) in this case, as the likelihood of the plaintiff(s) to prevail on the merits of facts and law as stated, is overwhelming.

REMEDY SECTION

133) A declaratory judgment is needed in order to establish the rights of the plaintiff and defendants. The discovery that the Title of Nobility Clauses of the Constitution operate upon the offspring of U.S. citizen female mothers in order to prevent the offspring of U.S. citizen mothers and foreign fathers from being defined as natural born Citizens that can be President means that defendant Obama must be declared to not be eligible to be President since he is not a natural born Citizen of the United States, as he was born to a foreign father who was never a United States citizen of a State of the Union. Guthrie reasons that neither is defendant Biden qualified, as he was appointed by Obama who had no right to appoint and form a presidential election ticket with Biden if Obama was not qualified to be President, so Biden would not even be the acting Vice President if it were not for the fraud of the defendant Obama. Jus et fraudem numquam cohabitant, goes a legal maxim. Right and fraud never go together. Jus ex injuria non oritur, reads another. A right cannot arise from a wrong.

134) Incorporating all the facts stated in this petition, and as a result of 133 above, by the Presidential Survivability Act of 1947, the current Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner is the lawful President. A notice must issue to the Speaker of the House of Representatives John Boehner informing him that there is an incapacity that exists that prevents both defendant Obama and Biden from serving in their official capacities, due to the Congress failing to properly do their job under the Twentieth Amendment, as they failed to discover that Obama is not a natural born Citizen. Defendant Congress must be ordered to take notice of the objective definition of natural born Citizen, so that John Boehner can take the Office of President and then trigger the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to appoint a Vice President. This will then permit Congress to step in under the Twenty-Fifth Amendment and deal with the injuries and damages which they will have created for themselves within the Congress.

135) An order and restraint must be issued to the defendants informing them, and to inform all Obama appointees, which will cause them to take judicial notice of the objective definition of natural born Citizen. Once they realize the definition, then they will realize that their warrants to their claims to office are defective and they must step down until Congress can review them and decide whether or not to re-appoint and re-confirm them in their offices.

136) A judgment needs to issue declaring that all Acts, laws, rules, regulations, executive orders, etc., passed under the authority of the defendant Obama and Congress etc., since Obamats inauguration in 2009, are null and void.

137) Plaintiff Guthrie fears for his safety, name, and reputation, by coming forward to file this complaint which reveals the truth of his discovery of the objective definition and meaning of natural born Citizen. The remedy outlined above in 133 through 136 is an emergency and is necessary in order to secure from the time of filing this case plaintiff Guthrie’s name and reputation, and physical safety, from those who have much to lose if the truth comes out, who would seek to libel Guthrie, or seek violent revenge upon him or his family. If the above outlined remedy is forthcoming, then any damages could be limited and be under the Court’s jurisdiction to contain. Failure to provide the remedy prayed for in a timely fashion will create damages for Guthrie that neither he nor the country may ever be able to recover from. Guthrie prays that the court would take note of the objective fact that Guthrie has established the definition of natural born Citizen and as a result he needs the assistance of the court to guide Guthrie in how to word a motion and order which will set off the correct chain of events that will cause the correct responsible actors to correct the ship of state and rescue Guthrie and all the natural born Citizens from their plight.

138) Guthrie prays the court will award Guthrie his actual damages hi the amount of 10,000 dollars due to the loss of income over the 4 years that Guthrie has been so emotionally distressed that he has not been able to effectively make his jewelry or effectively interact with his customers and make sales, plus expenses pertaining to this suit. Guthrie also is seeking compensatory damages of 50 million dollars for the terror and extreme emotional stress and loss of Freedom and quality of life over the last four years that is still ongoing and now growing worse due to the actions of the defendants, and asks the court to consider a punitive damage award for the egregious nature of the offences being committed against natural born Citizens and Mr. Guthrie.

Wherefore, Plaintiff Paul Guthrie, acting on his own behalf under his duty obliged as a natural born Citizen and moral member of society, respectfully prays for judgment in his favor against the defendants named and for all other just and proper relief.

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff Paul Guthrie demands a jury trial in the above captioned matter.

I certify under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge, the foregoing
is true and correct
Respectfully submitted,
Paul A. Guthrie
In propria persona acting Pro se

2 thoughts on “Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL – Complaint

Comments are closed.