Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL – Docket

U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL
GUTHRIE v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue
Demand: $9,999,000
Cause: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Date Filed: 01/14/2013
Date Terminated: 01/18/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 540 Mandamus & Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Plaintiff
PAUL A. GUTHRIE
in propia persona
also known as
GENERAL JEDI PAULY
represented by PAUL A. GUTHRIE
7797 South Carefree Drive
Pendleton, IN 46064
317-485-4229
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
the alleged President of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR.
the alleged Vice President of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
MARTIN DEMPSEY
the alleged Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Office of the President of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
ERIC HOLDER
the alleged Attorney General of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
the alleged Secretary of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
ELENA KAGAN
the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
SONIA SOTOMAYOR
the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually
Defendant
UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Defendant
UNITED STATES SENATE
Defendant
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
et al.
Date Filed # Docket Text
01/14/2013 1 COMPLAINT filed by PAUL A. GUTHRIE against JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, MARTIN DEMPSEY, ERIC HOLDER, ELENA KAGAN, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, SONIA SOTOMAYOR, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, and UNITED STATES SENATE, et al. (DJH) (Entered: 01/15/2013)
01/14/2013 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff, PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (Attachments: # 1 additional information)(DJH) (Entered: 01/15/2013)
01/14/2013 3 MOTION for an Order Directing Service of Process filed by Plaintiff, PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (DJH) (Entered: 01/15/2013)
01/15/2013 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE’s NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) (Entered: 01/15/2013)
01/18/2013 5 ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/18/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 01/18/2013)
01/18/2013 6 ENTRY and ORDER – The action is dismissed pursuant to § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous because the court lacks jurisdiction over Guthrie’s action. The plaintiff’s motion for an order directing service of process 3 is denied as moot. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/18/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 01/18/2013)
01/18/2013 7 CLOSED JUDGMENT – The court, having this day made its 6 Entry, IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that this cause of action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/18/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 01/18/2013)
01/29/2013 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Petition for Emergency Injunction, Declaratory Relief, Mandamus, and Quo Warranto, Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants, filed by PAUL A. GUTHRIE.(JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)
01/29/2013 9 NOTICE / Changes Reflected in the First 8 Amended Complaint, filed by PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)
01/29/2013 10 MOTION for Relief From Judgment and Order, filed by Plaintiff PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)
01/29/2013 11 MOTION for Judge to Disqualify Herself, filed by Plaintiff PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)
01/29/2013 12 MOTION for Court to Order Service of Process, filed by Plaintiff PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (JKS) (Entered: 01/29/2013)
01/30/2013 13 ORDER denying 12 Plaintiff’s Motion For Service – The motion for service by U.S. Marshals 12 is denied as unwarranted at this point because this case has been closed. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/30/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 01/31/2013)
02/26/2013 14 ENTRY – The plaintiff shall have through March 6, 2013, in which to either seek to withdraw the pending post-judgment motions in this case or show cause why those motions should not be dismissed without prejudice because of the filing and pending status (as of this date) of No. 1:13-cv-00234-SEB-DKL. ***SEE ENTRY***. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/26/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 02/26/2013)
02/26/2013 15 ORDER denying 11 Plaintiff’s Motion seeking disqualification. ***SEE ORDER***.. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/26/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 02/26/2013)
03/05/2013 16 OBJECTION To Ms. Jane Magnus-Stinson’s Interference With Paul Guthrie’s Rights Of Due Process And Attempt To Use Guthrie To Give Herself Legitimacy As A Judge, by PAUL A. GUTHRIE. (JKS) (Entered: 03/05/2013)
04/02/2013 17 ENTRY – The plaintiff’s objection to the assignment of the undersigned 16 is without legal or factual basis and is therefore overruled. The post-judgment motion for relief from judgment, treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment 10 , is denied. An amended complaint was filed after the entry of final judgment. The postjudgment motion for relief from the dismissal of the action has been denied. In light of these circumstances, the amended complaint is of no effect. The case remains closed. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/2/2013. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail) (JKS) (Entered: 04/03/2013)