Walt and listening comprehension

On Thursday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Luke A. McLaurin falsely stated to three judges at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals that Fitzpatrick and Huff had exchanged “text messages” prior to and on the morning of April 20, 2010 in order to “plan” a “takeover” of the Monroe County courthouse.

If you listen to the exchange (around 32:00) , you will hear that the statement is that “he had gone up to Madisonville, he consulted with Fitzpatrick, he sent text messages back saying no we did not conduct a citizen’s arrest today”

To what was the Attorney referring?

Following that meeting, Defendant informed a friend via text message that no citizens’ arrests had been conducted that day. (R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1690.) When the friend asked if Defendant had “pull[ed] out the mussell [sic]” (id.), which was a reference to “some type of force” (R. 211, Trial Tr. at 1799), Defendant replied that he had not because Fitzpatrick had been released the night before (R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1690). Defendant explained, however, that it had not been a “wasted trip” because he had “met with the arrested to coordinate with all groups involved.” (Id. at PageID# 1690-91.) Defendant also stated, “we’re moving on to Phase 2.” (Id. at PageID# 1690.)

So Darren informed his friend that he had indeed met with the arrested to coordinate with all the groups involved and that they are moving on to Phase 2. Again, the testimony and evidence, does not appear to conflict with what the US Attorney said. Note that the US Attorney does not state that Darren had exchanged text messages with Fitzpatrick.

Walt: At Huff’s trial, there was no mention of “text messages,” and Fitzpatrick was never charged with participating in a conspiracy to commit violence.

Walt may not be fully familiar with the evidence that was brought into the trial of Darren Huff, but he is right that Fitzpatrick was never charged with participating in a conspiracy to commit violence. So why is Walt so upset? And why does he claim to be fearing for his life?

… all of which proved to be false reports called in to the mayor’s office by members of The Fogbow, a group of Obama sycophants who may now be under observation by law enforcers themselves.

Again, Walt is wrong. The bank manager and the teller were both concerned by Darren’s statements about “taking over the city” that they separately contacted the police. While others may have been concerned by the rhetoric of those attending Madisonville, the police response appears to have been quite appropriate give the statements Darren had made to Longmire and Dupree.

That morning, however, Defendant made comments that were “out of the ordinary.” (Id. at PageID# 1452.) Defendant told Longmire and Dupree that, on April 20, 2010, he was going to Madisonville with members of the Georgia Militia to “take over” the city. (Id. at PageID# 1447-49, 1454; R. 210, Trial Tr. at 1471-74, 1485-86.) He explained that they were going there because Fitzpatrick had been “wrongly arrested.” (R. 209, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1448.) Defendant stated he was going to bring multiple guns, including an AK-47 rifle, and that he would be on the “front line.” (Id. at PageID# 1449; accord R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1471-73.) He also said that he would have an anti-aircraft gun mounted on the back of his truck. (R. 209, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1450, 1456; R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1473, 1480-82.) Defendant assured Longmire and Dupree that they would hear about the incident on the news. (R. 209, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1449; R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1472.)

As Defendant was speaking, Longmire noticed that Defendant had driven a different truck to the bank than the one he normally drove. (R. 209, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1451-52.) The new truck was painted camouflage and had a “Georgia Militia” emblem on the door. (Id. at PageID# 1452, 1456.) When Defendant left the bank, he told Dupree that it had been nice knowing her and suggested that he might not ever see her again. (R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1475.) Longmire and Dupree both believed that Defendant was serious and were so concerned by his statements that they each separately contacted law enforcement authorities. (R. 209, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1452-53; R. 210, Trial Tr. at PageID# 1472, 1475-78.)

Given Darren’s statements in the text messages and to his bank manager and teller, it does not appear that the police response had been disproportional. The “Madisonville hoax”, as Walt calls it, may have been boastful statements by Darren, but they were serious enough for the police to take notice. The jury similarly found Darren Huff guilty of a violation of US Code 18 USC 231(a)(2)

(2) Whoever transports or manufactures for transportation in commerce any firearm, or explosive or incendiary device, knowing or having reason to know or intending that the same will be used unlawfully in furtherance of a civil disorder; or
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Walt may believe that the Madisonville police action was based on a hoax but the evidence supports the police’s decision to be prepared, in light of the statements made by participants. One can only imagine what could have happened were it not for the presence of the police.

9 thoughts on “Walt and listening comprehension

  1. Have not checked this on the wayback machine, but I was following events at the time. I specifically remember Walt on his Jaghunter website was posting remarks about “bringing fire” upon the courthouse.

    Some time later, in an interview with the P and E, he reportedly (according to P and E) said something like “it is time to start shooting people dead in the streets”. That remark was stricken from the interview after a few days, but I made a screen shot of it.
    I wonder how he would react if confronted with his own statements.

  2. Interesting, I will see if I can find some more historical information. Some of Darren and Carl’s statements have also been scrubbed or so it seems.

  3. Try this…




    Getting soaked in the misting rain were Chelsea Curtis, John R. Ivens, Joshua Sneed, William Duck, Jim Headings, Kathleen Walsh, Christine Reno, M.J. “Zeb” Blanchard and “Spitfire” Barbara Haley (hey Spitfire).

    Stephanie Flater drove down from Illinois (11 hours each way).

    The Sons of Liberty were there and folks from the 2nd American Revolution were on station, ready for call for fire.

  4. The Fogbow preserves a version of the other remark:
    Here is the current link
    I don’t go past the pay wall, so I can’t tell if the remarks have been edited.

    Fogbow version:
    “We’re being infiltrated by our enemies. It’s as much in our own communities as it is out of the White House. We’re getting to the point where it’s time to take up guns and start shooting people dead. These law enforcement officials are modern-day storm-troopers.”

  5. “ready for call for fire”. Somewhat ambiguous as to what Walt meant here. His discussions captured by blogtalkradio before and after these incidents, do show that he predicts violence.

  6. 19 April – “PixelPatriot” Carl Swensson lays out their goals for tomorrow’s treasonpoloza at Walter Fitzpatrick’s hearing on 20 April 2010.

    “We have two goals:

    1. Complete exoneration of Lt. Cmdr. Fitzpatrick and ( 0900 hrs. at the Beecher Witt Bldg. which is behind the Courthouse)”

    “2. Completion of arrests initiated on the 1st by Lt. Cmdr. Fitzpatrick”

    “This is not a demonstartion or a parade or a march. We have reason to be there.”

  7. Yes, it looks like some history has been erased but the Obots managed to capture at least some of it.

    Carl’s statement is most damaging as it shows the intent to go and try to effect citizen’s arrests.

  8. @ Burnell L. Harrison

    This is what the edited version on the P&E says now:

    “Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood. We’re being infiltrated by our enemies. It’s as much in our own communities as it is out of the White House. These law enforcement officials are modern-day storm-troopers.”

Comments are closed.