Taitz v Donahue – Orly totally confused…

Orly claims:

Tampering with the electronic docket in DC Document 19 is missing, document 19 and 21 are not clickable, Taitz is unable to file a reply to opposition to her motion for summary judgment. Did this happen on Friday when the whole system was hacked? Was Obama’s case the target?

Taitz, to AUSA wrote:
for some reason document 19 is missing from the electronic docket and documents 20 and 21 are not clickable. Please, send me the opposition as an attachment to your e-mail
Of course, when checking the actual docket, the Fogbow found that documents 18 and 19 are clickable and 20/21 refer to 18/19. Can Orly not parse simple English? But really, why would she claim tampering rather than first double check? Clueless I tell you…
2014-01-03 18 0 Memorandum in opposition to re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ORLY TAITZ. (rdj) (Entered: 01/06/2014)

2014-01-24 19 0 REPLY to opposition to motion re 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 01/24/2014)

2014-01-03 20 0 MOTION for Summary Judgment by ORLY TAITZ. (See Docket Entry 18 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)

2014-01-24 21 0 Memorandum in opposition to re 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by PATRICK DONAHUE, DAVID C. WILLIAMS. (See Docket Entry 19 to view document) (jf, ) (Entered: 01/26/2014)