DC – Taitz v Colvin (Astrue)…

From the Fogbow:

The DOJ is finally expressing frustration with Taitz’s continued violation of the redacting rules. I’ll bet it’s still much easier for Judge Lamberth to simply dismiss the case…again…than to sanction her ass for her willful and repeated violations.

Hilarious note:

Defendant has not sought sanctions for Plaintiff’s past violations out of respect for the Court’s time and mindful that collateral motions practice is generally disfavored. Defendant has noted the Court’s statement in its June 7, 2013 Order that it “has declined to previously impose sanctions because the defendant has not sought them,” and, in light of Plaintiff’s continued disregard for the Rules, will consider whether to file such a motion.

2013-11-04 54 0 MOTION to Strike 52 MOTION for Reconsideration re 51 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion for Leave to File, Order on Motion to Strike,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, by CAROLYN W. COLVIN (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/04/2013)2013-11-04 55 0 Memorandum in opposition to re 52 MOTION for Reconsideration re 51 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Order on Motion for Leave to File, Order on Motion to Strike,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, filed by CAROLYN W. COLVIN. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 11/04/2013)