Reality Check – Xerox Theory consistent with expert report

Reality Check has done another fine job explaining why the Xerox workflow has become such a likely explanation for the artifacts seen in the White House Long Form Birth Certificate PDF.

While some people who claim to be doing a ‘criminal investigation’ appear to refuse to investigate leads until they are accompanied by an affidavit, ignoring these findings will only lead to more embarrassing situations. Of course, the timing of our findings may seem particularly unfortunate for those who want to impeach our President, as much of the foundation of their claims has been destroyed almost overnight. What remains seems to be speculation, hearsay but nothing that really supports a claim of forgery.

The question is: Will the Cold Case Posse, and Mike Zullo, properly disclose these findings to Congress? And why is Gallup being kept up to date with this criminal investigation? To me it sounds more like a PR project than a real criminal investigation.

I’d love to see this issue get in front of Congress. The embarrassments will be quite helpful for our President’s midterm hopes.

A criminal investigation?… Really… By no standards I am familiar with this, could this be called such. And they seem to realize this as well, as they have started to ridicule the Obots, while refusing to hear our claims, let alone rebut them.

It’s already bad enough that their experts who claimed that it was 100% certain that the PDF was forged, may have to retract their findings, but to let this move forward without investigating our finding, borders on the reckless.

Into what a wonderful corner they have painted themselves…

HT: Bob Ross The Fogbow

16 thoughts on “Reality Check – Xerox Theory consistent with expert report

  1. I just posted a lengthy comment on the Hacker Factor about this. I hope Dr. Krawetz reads it. When I contacted him a long time ago about appearing on my show this is what he said:

    Hi RC,

    … I’m really not interested in getting deeper into this conspiracy. The people
    you are arguing against are a very vocal minority who are so sure of their
    beliefs that no amount of fact will sway them

  2. “I just posted a lengthy comment on the Hacker Factor about this.”

    And at professor de Queiroz? or John Woodman’s?

  3. It’s already bad enough that their experts who claimed that it was 100% certain that the PDF was forged, may have to retract their findings, but to let this move forward without investigating our finding, borders on the reckless.

    It was clear by Zullo’s 2nd (of three) “affidavits” that he was already well down the birther rabbit hole and had abandoned all but the pretense of an investigation. His naive and uncritical acceptance of even the most idiotic and meretricious of birther theories remained unrattled even through the exposure of the faked coding manuals that served as the humiliating centerpiece of the July 2012 press conference. That may have been the inspiration for his break with Corsi and Gillar, but it also established the pattern that we are now seeing repeated.

    Pretend that demonstrations of incompetence never happened, and hope they will simply fade away in the consciousness of the fans.

    I identified long ago that Zullo is of a type. I have of number of them in my own family, and I would be happy to wax eloquently some other time regarding the specific ethno-sociological context that drives so many Italian males into a self destructive pursuit of social status. But suffice it to say, Zullo’s payoff here is that for once in his life he is being treated as a “big shot.” He failed as a cop. He failed as a private investigator. He spent the better part of his adult life in a profession that has always served as a punch-line for stand-up comedians. He comes from a culture that values “rispetto” in over compensation for “impotenza,” and that historically glorifies the bully just as much as the intellectual. And for once in his life somebody… anybody is calling him “Lieutenant.” They are listening to him “on the radio.” They are paying him attention because he “knows something” that they don’t.

    I look at Zullo and I see a tragedy. I see beloved cousins who broke up their families and destroyed good businesses because they wanted to be big shots more than they wanted to be fathers and husbands. I see a man who does not like who he is and so is desperate to be somebody else. I see a man embracing with unconsidered enthusiasm the penultimate role in a lifetime of mediocrity:

    That of a cautionary tale.

  4. And at professor de Queiroz? or John Woodman’s?

    I sent a short email with some links to Professor de Queiroz. He doesn’t really have the time to get involved. However, he agrees that the “YCbCr” comment is non-functional in the normal JPEG standard and could have just been something a programmer forgot to clean up.

    John Woodman has read NBC’s blog. He views the Xerox discoveries as vindication of what he wrote and damning to the Cold Case Posse’s attacks on him. I don’t think he is interested in coming out of retirement. His blog was still closed to new comments last time I checked.

  5. “But suffice it to say, Zullo’s payoff here is that for once in his life he is being treated as a “big shot.” ”

    I read that and accidentally substituted Apuzzo for Zullo.

  6. “some who were suspicious of the timing.”

    Errr … why? The relevant patents go back to 1999. Are you saying there are birfers who would allege Xerox saw the LFBC, decided it looked pretty nifty, created a compression scheme to replicate the results, and then sent it back in time?

  7. Are you saying there are birfers who would allege Xerox saw the LFBC, decided it looked pretty nifty, created a compression scheme to replicate the results, and then sent it back in time?

    Several already have. Butterdezillion among them.

  8. “Several already have. Butterdezillion among them.”

    Well, thanks Historiandude. I’ll just go ahead and take your word for it …. and should have known, I guess!
    “Never overestimate The Stupid …. never overestimate The Stupid …. never get out of the boat ….!”

  9. Mark Gillar left the following comment on my satirical YouTube video:

    TeaPartyPowerHour 10 hours ago

    CHRISTMAS COMES EARLY FOR THE COLD CASE POSSE:

    For two years every single anomaly pointing toward the forgery of Obama’s LFBC

    has been dismissed by OBOTS as something could have been caused by the specific scanner used to scan in the LFBC PDF.

    With the exact machine now known and plenty of 1961 LFBCs at their disposal, the CCP now knows where the scanner anomalies end and the indisputable signs of forgery begin.

    As one CCP expert said, a dollar bill that is 99% genuine is still counterfeit.

    I assume Mark Gillar somewhat speaks for the CCP. That sounds like a concession that the Xerox theory is correct. They have moved from a 100% forgery to a 1% forgery. I call that real progress.

  10. With the exact machine now known and plenty of 1961 LFBCs at their disposal, the CCP now knows where the scanner anomalies end and the indisputable signs of forgery begin.

    As I said several days ago… the MCCCP is now in furious backpedaling mode. And the only thing that they have been able to demonstrate is that they are themselves incompetent to determine what is or is not an “indisputable sign of forgery,” Their list of previously asserted “indisputable signs” has now shrunk to essential nonexistence.

  11. I assume Mark Gillar somewhat speaks for the CCP. That sounds like a concession that the Xerox theory is correct. They have moved from a 100% forgery to a 1% forgery. I call that real progress.

    Wow, that’s humongous. So they should soon be announcing that their 100% has dropped to 1%… And I bet that the 1% is based on such foolishness as tab stops and kerning, african race etc… So soon it should be 0.01%…

    So will they admit to their foolishness? Or will they continue to hide these developments while talking to hapless members of congress? What really remains once the 100% forgery is reduced to 1%… Hardly that impressive… And now totally circumstantial…

    Does not sound as if our findings were of ‘no concern’…

  12. 99% concern vs. No Concern …. I look forward to the next Stupid Deathmatch … Gallups v. Gillar.

    Love the ROFLBOT mushroom cloud stamp, BTW😀

Comments are closed.