“Amazing how this person keeps coming up with evidence to support the theory … almost miraculous.”
From what I can see, NBC is not showing evidence to support any theory. He is making claims of fact that are falsifiable.
NBC: Well, I am arguing that the evidence supports much better that the document was created by a Xerox WorkCentre than through forgery.
If NBC’s claims prove to be true and can be replicated by others, then the claims serve to falsify the claims of Zullo’s team that certain specific artifacts in the WH LFBC “cannot be replicated on any known copier.”
Zullo has stated that inability to replicate the artifacts supports a claim that the WH LFBC never existed as a paper document and therefor MUST have been forged electronically.
NBC: You got it
Obviously, this particular claim of proof of forgery by Zullo fails (is falsified) if NBC has succeeded in demonstrating that these artifacts can be replicated.
NBC: Again, that is true.
The truth is the truth and regardless of how long it took for someone to demonstrate it (if NBC has) it is what it is.
Proving Barry’s LFBC to be a forgery, if it is a forgery, will have to rely on OTHER claims that cannot be falsified and/or other evidence.
NBC: That is also correct