Xerox 7655 – AP Identical Characters JBIG2

So let’s look at some JBIG2 artifacts

Residence of Mother

Click on images for a larger image

residence of mother APNote how the three e’s are all identical in the JBIG2 encoded PDF

residence of mother

Birth City

Click on images for a larger image

Birth City APNote the two Identical ‘t’ Birth CityThere are more but I am sure you get the picture. Another artifact explained.

28 thoughts on “Xerox 7655 – AP Identical Characters JBIG2

  1. I’m curious. Is the scanning and compression technology and algorithms you keep citing of the Xerox 7655 unique to that one model are they part of most or all of the Xerox WorkCenter models?

  2. I stopped by Office Depot and Staples today. All those retailers use Xerox WorkCenter Printer models (but Not the 7655 that I can see but similar models.)

  3. Given what I saw at Office Depot and Staples, it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the CCP DID NOT consider high end Xerox WorkCenter printers their tests. In addition, Miki has revealed that she let the CCP use her original hard copy long form Hawaii birth certificates in their tests. They could not replicate the anomolies. NBC does not have an original to work with. Obama’s doesn’t count because it is a PDF or JPEG printout and not a tangible document.

  4. You are sounding desperate now John. Is it finally dawning on you that your heroes at the CCP did shoddy research? We know they didn’t try a Xerox WorkCentre or they would have never made this statement:

    Optimization only creates a single 1 bit transparent text layer consisting of the text and graphic elements of the image. By contrast the file posted on the White House website has several 1-bit transparent text layers. These extra text layers include the state registrar’s date stamp, state registrar’s signature stamp, portions of the registrar general’s date stamp and most of the local registrar’s date stamp.

    Nope they would not have said that would they, John.?

    Having Miki Booth’s birth certificate or her son’s is meaningless unless you do the real research. About any document will show the principles involved if you use the correct hardware and software.

    So you saw Xerox WorkCentre’s at you local Office Depot, John? Good, why don’t you print a copy of the LFBC and run down and pay a dollar to get it scanned to a CD or emailed if they will do that. Then get a copy of Illustrator. You can get an evaluation copy or even get the older versions for free. If you have a friend with a Mac have them open it in Preview and print to PDF and examine both files in Illustrator. Then report the results to us and to your friends at the Cold Case Posse.

    Come on John. For mere pennies you could know the truth.

    John, aren’t you just the least bit puzzled why Garrett Papit isn’t over here screaming that he ran the same tests and the Obots are wrong? How about Mark “I made a silly Obot the Clown video” Gillar? Why isn’t he here any longer? He knows about the Xerox work. Itold him but he is hiding. How about Zullo’s biggest fan of all. Carl Gallups? Why isn’t he talking about how Zullo can show the Obots are wrong on this Xerox stuff on his Friday radio show? Where is Carl?

    No, John. You have been left here all alone. They have abandoned you John.

  5. Actually RC, I would love to do just that just to see the results for myself. I would be great if Miki could send me her birth certificate to work with.

    But, I may not have to…

    Apparently, Miki did send her originals to the CCP.

    “I provided all our birth certificates to CCP and that of a friend who was born 2 weeks after oblowme. They ran over 400 tests and none could replicate the forgery.”

    So is seems that CCP used Obama’s birth certificate as the primary element in their test since that is the item of revelavance. But, the CCP has also used an “Original Tangible hard copy contemprary birth certificate” to confirm their tests. NBC doesn’t have this.

  6. John

    So Miki provided Johanna Ah’Nee’s brith certificate to the CCP? Did you know it was never returned to her? What tests did they run? What hardware? Software? What results did they obtain? What were there parameters for judging the results.

    NBC has provided the files. You can go run the tests yourself John . What are you waiting on John?

  7. Of course, the birth certificate will always be under suspicion because the “African” Race problem. In fact, I have noticed most race identifiers on Hawaii Birth certificate associate the race with a country not a continent – Eg. Chinese for China not Asian. German for Germany not European. In Obama Sr’s case, he should be referred as Kenyan not African. Although the Kenya Census mentions African as a race, that is Kenya or Africa not Hawaii or the United States. In fact, On Obama’s immigration file, he is referred to on a document as “Kenya” under the race identifier. I guess this is to mean Kenyan. In addition, Obama Sr’s birthplace of “Kenya, East Africa” is inconsistent on with what is shown in the Obama Sr. immigration file of either “Kenya” or “Kenya, African (No East Africa)”

  8. John said:

    Of course, the birth certificate will always be under suspicion …

    Of course it will John. Birthers have already shown themselves willing to say black is white and white is black over and over. What part of the fact that the race is self reported have you failed to comprehend?

  9. When Obama Sr. registered with the University of Hawaii, his race was listed as Kenya(Kenyan) not African.

  10. The two August date stamps were lifted directly off another birth certificate. Yes, the day was changed, but everything else is identical including the angles of both stamps. Tell me RC, what are the odds of two hand-placed stamps on two separate birth certificates having the exact same exact angles? Did the forger get lazy or is it just that all capturing tools would have preserved the original angles?

    There is an old saying RC: “A dollar bill that is 99% genuine is still counterfeit.” Keep that in mind as we move forward.
    Obama’s LFBC isn’t 99% genuine, but you get the idea.

    I will add that Hawaiian officials have gone out of their way to cover their own asses when commenting on the LFBC pdf. To borrow a line from Bill Clinton, they’ve given answers that are legally accurate but intentionally misleading. They reference documents in their files containing information matching the information in the pdf. Actually, I believe them. The problem is that most of the “documents” that supplement the original report of a birth were added in late 2006 and early 2007. That’s far too late to have any legal value. If I were Obama, I’d fight like hell to keep the files sealed too.

  11. John said

    When Obama Sr. registered with the University of Hawaii, his race was listed as Kenya(Kenyan) not African.

    If true (link?) it is easily explained. Obama, Sr. filled out the paperwork for U of H and Stanley Ann provided the info to the nurse filling out the BC form at Kapi’olni.

    Is this “African” thing really all you have John?

  12. Very Possible Mark. We know Obama went to Hawaii just before the election to apparently visit his sick grandma. There is intense speculation that Obama really to Hawaii to make changes to his birth documentation or to attend a critical hearing about his eligiblity to be on the Hawaii ballot. It appears Obama was going to be booted off Hawaii’s ballot possibly due to his birth certificate problems. However, Obama was entilted to a hearing before the decision was made final. Obama attended this hearing apparently sorted it out.

  13. Mark Gillar said

    The two August date stamps were lifted directly off another birth certificate. Yes, the day was changed, but everything else is identical including the angles of both stamps. Tell me RC, what are the odds of two hand-placed stamps on two separate birth certificates having the exact same exact angles? Did the forger get lazy or is it just that all capturing tools would have preserved the original angles?

    There is an old saying RC: “A dollar bill that is 99% genuine is still counterfeit.” Keep that in mind as we move forward.
    Obama’s LFBC isn’t 99% genuine, but you get the idea.

    I will add that Hawaiian officials have gone out of their way to cover their own asses when commenting on the LFBC pdf. To borrow a line from Bill Clinton, they’ve given answers that are legally accurate but intentionally misleading. They reference documents in their files containing information matching the information in the pdf. Actually, I believe them. The problem is that most of the “documents” that supplement the original report of a birth were added in late 2006 and early 2007. That’s far too late to have any legal value. If I were Obama, I’d fight like hell to keep the files sealed too.

    So what are we up to now in crazy claims? Is this number 32 or 33? All the others have been debunked so you had to invent a new one? Is the “scanners and software didn’t produce the clipping masks” claim no longer operative any more?

    This one is so silly it is laughable. You cannot name the forger, the software they used, or duplicate the forgers work flow but you know that they couldn’t even find a date stamp or know that any photo editing software program ever written has a rotate function.

    Hawaii is just following their own laws and DoH rules. If I were an official there I would not cooperate with some moron pretend law enforcement officer who had called me a liar either. Would you care to back up the claim that ” most of the “documents” that supplement the original report of a birth were added in late 2006 and early 2007″ with something even remotely resembling evidence of than pulling it out of your ass? I seem to remember that the birth announcements were published in 1961. Oh, I forgot you have to say those are faked too don’t you? And those fake newspaper records were placed into three separate libraries.

  14. Of course Hawaii was certainly correct if they were suspicious of Zullo’s motives since he was secretly recording his meeting with Jill Nagamine. How unethical was that?

  15. Perhaps NBC is not doing his experiments correctly. He really needs to release his PDFs.

    A real possibility indeed, which is why I will release the documents in due time. In the mean time…

  16. John: I’m curious. Is the scanning and compression technology and algorithms you keep citing of the Xerox 7655 unique to that one model are they part of most or all of the Xerox WorkCenter models?

    There are a variety of workcentre models and the 7655 is not even sold anymore as there are newer ones available. The 7655 is bsased on the simple observation that the Whitehouse scanned tax returns on such a device close to when they scanned the WH LFBC.

    Call it an ‘educated guess’ supported by the available evidence. But yes, others such as the 7535 also seem to do much of the same workflow.

  17. Given what I saw at Office Depot and Staples, it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the CCP DID NOT consider high end Xerox WorkCenter printers their tests

    You may overestimate the diligence by the Cold Case Posse perhaps? So far they have not impressed me as very informed in these areas, especially at the PDF and JPG level. Did they even find the embedded jpeg comment in the WH LFBC? Did they notice the JPEG quantization matrices? Did they notice the 8 bit alignment of the foreground bitmaps? Again, all missed opportunities to catch a ‘forger’

    Sloppy sloppy…

  18. Mark Gillar: The two August date stamps were lifted directly off another birth certificate. Yes, the day was changed, but everything else is identical including the angles of both stamps.

    Mark appears to be upset that we have identified the likely ‘forger’ of the PDF and it is a Xerox WorkCentre… Now he makes up additional claims about identical, but not so identical stamps and claims that the President is keeping the documents sealed…

    Funny how denial is such a strong emotion…

    Can you point us to these identical august stamps?

  19. Mark Gillar: I will add that Hawaiian officials have gone out of their way to cover their own asses when commenting on the LFBC pdf. To borrow a line from Bill Clinton, they’ve given answers that are legally accurate but intentionally misleading.

    The latter part of course is pure speculation. They have verified and certified his birth on US soil. That’s all that matters my friend. They have even released his long form birth certificate.
    But some people cannot accept these simple facts and have to accuse the other side of being intentionally misleading… With no supporting evidence to back that up

  20. Mark Gillar – “The two August date stamps were lifted directly off another birth certificate.”

    Are you talking about Johanna Ah’Nee’s? Speaking of which, how do you explain the lower certification number?

  21. Are you talking about Johanna Ah’Nee’s? Speaking of which, how do you explain the lower certification number?

    Perhaps he confused it with the hand written date after the mother’s signature which in both the Obama certificate as well as the Nordyke certificate appear to be similar.
    The answer of course is as trivial as this observation.

  22. I think Gillar is referring to the Ah’nee certificate. The only similarity is that on each certificate the date stamps in boxes 20 and 22 slope up on the left and down on the right. Other than that: The dates are different. The stamps are at different positions in the boxes. The Ah’nee image is a low resolution copy. The backgrounds are different. The Ah’nee certificate was not available until well after the President’s long form certificate was released. Gillar’s claims are getting sillier was we go along.

    It would be nice to have a better and unredacted copy of the Ah’nee certificate for something else I am working on however.😉

  23. It would be nice to have a better and unredacted copy of the Ah’nee certificate for something else I am working on however.

    Or better resolution🙂 Still, we work with what we get, and manage to squeeze out a likely forger, that should count for something…

  24. I think Gillar is referring to the Ah’nee certificate.

    Yes, I see now, he should also refer to the Nordyke hand written date…

    Anything to avoid the obvious conclusion that the artifacts in the WH PDF can be trivially explained now.

    Sure, you can now attack the validity of the original document but that’s going to be an uphill battle. Well, even more uphill than it has been.

    The CCP should retract some of its findings or address the new findings, especially when they are disclosing some of this to third parties in their quixotic quest.

  25. There are several dates and they do provide us with some issues: The Nordyke hand written date appears to be quite similar to the one on Obama’s LFBC, but of course, this has a very reasonable explanation. Then there are the 1961 date stamps which appear to be ‘similar’ but not ‘similar’. Note that if they can be replicated they could also have been rotated🙂 However, there is just no good data to compare the two date stamps at this moment and I doubt we will get higher resolution samples from Zullo or Corsi…

  26. John says: “Very Possible Mark. We know Obama went to Hawaii just before the election to apparently visit his sick grandma. There is intense speculation that Obama really to Hawaii to make changes to his birth documentation or to attend a critical hearing about his eligiblity to be on the Hawaii ballot. It appears Obama was going to be booted off Hawaii’s ballot possibly due to his birth certificate problems. However, Obama was entilted to a hearing before the decision was made final. Obama attended this hearing apparently sorted it out.”

    Any hearing would be a public record and nowhere that close to the actual election. Where is the court record? Or the ballot challenge? Such action would certainly be headlines all over the world.

    As for changing birth documentation — wouldn’t that require a court order? Name changes do.

Comments are closed.