Again, NBC and his cohort are admitted amateurs and they have no credentials to match Reed Hayes, Doug Vogt or Adobe expert Mara Zabest. Zullo needs to consult with them to counter this latest disinformation tactic they are using and neutralize their scheme.
Yes, we all are amateurs who have applied our skills to venture deeper than the Cold Case Posse has. The CCP made the regrettable error of dismissing John Woodman’s findings, as well as the findings by others, that the document strongly suggested an MRC (Mixed Raster Compression) workflow.
Unable to indentify the software/hardware combination, they dismissed Woodman’s findings.
Through coincidence, luck, serendipity, hard work and some sleuthing, these amateurs have now proposed a fully testable workflow and have documented how the workflow explains many if not most of the ‘artifacts’ and ‘anomalies’ identified by ‘experts’.
Luckily we do not need to wave claims of ‘expertise’, we have something much better: A workable and testable hypothesis and the supporting data. In that context, I am also interested to hear what Mr Hayes had to say about the document, as he too, seems to insist that the document contained anomalies that led to a forger conclusion, but as was the case with the CCP, the forger may very well have been a simple algorithmic workflow.
I am however looking forward to third parties taking a look at the evidence and the workflow and report their findings.
That’s how one scientifically tests hypotheses.
As to Mr Vogt, I believe that his ‘criminal complaint’ got the right attention. It appears that the FBI was not very impressed. Nor was for example Judge Malihi who heard the testimony of seven witnesses and received additional affidavits.
The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations
CCP Supporter: I personally believe ‘NBC’ is not replicating Obama’s document at all but rather insinuating he is and changing the data to make it seem so while using Obama’s existing document image on the White House website.
We all have our beliefs and if they provide us with comfort then who am I to disagree with them. However, for those who are interested, I am providing all the necessary data and steps that can be reproduced by anyone interested.
If you are right in your beliefs, then it should not be too hard to find errors that undermine the hypothesis presented.
Such is how science works and I am totally open to any feedback that either supports or contradicts my findings. Speculations are not in that category however.