Xerox/WH PDF – Part 12 Doc 35, 35-1 and 35-2

Orly posted a document on her website that shows all 3 documents (35, 35-1 and 35-2) combined and scanned in on what appears to be her scanner. The page with the Whitehouse jpeg of the Long Form Birth Certificate is crooked.

But this does give us an opportunity to look at other aspects. So it seems reasonable to assume that the documents were filed in Chambers and copies forwarded to the various counsels.

The document does not show the pin-cushioning effect, which would make sense. However, the resolution is pretty low. I am sure Orly would be more than willing to scan in the document for our friend Hermitian….

9 thoughts on “Xerox/WH PDF – Part 12 Doc 35, 35-1 and 35-2

  1. Come on, guys! All Onaka is doing is verifying the information contained in their files matches the ones posted on Obama’s White house website. He is not verifying the document posed on Obama’s White house website is a an exact copy of an official LFBC of Barack H. Obama.

    [NBC: Another one who cannot read… No wonder their legal cases go nowhere…]

  2. “NBC

    “But this does give us an opportunity to look at other aspects. So it seems reasonable to assume that the documents were filed in Chambers and copies forwarded to the various counsels.”

    Don’t you just love it when the Obots dig down deep to uncover the facts ???

  3. Don’t you just love it when the Obots dig down deep to uncover the facts ???

    A good investigator looks at all the evidence to try to explain the known data. For example, we know that the documents were mailed in paper format to Orly Taitz and delivered to the Judge’s chambers. The former because she scanned them in the latter because document 35-0 tells us so.

    A good detective takes all these hints and facts and formulate a working hypothesis that best matches the data known so far.

    It’s all part of good research.

    It’s a lot of fun to follow the little breadcrumbs that are left behind and come up with a coherent and consistent story.

    That’s what a forensic examiner does and that’s what I aim to do. By sharing my findings in a stepwise fashion, I provide others with an insight into how I go about formulating my hypotheses and how I test or reject them.

    Science is a tentative process where data leads to hypotheses that lead to tests that lead to new hypotheses.

  4. While you are at it, you may want to read

    this posting where I explained several of my findings based on Vicklund’s experiments.

    I am looking forward to a proper rebuttal or alternatively a reproduction of my finding. Either way, you have your work ‘cut out’ for you.

  5. “NBC

    “July 17, 2013 22:04

    “Don’t you just love it when the Obots dig down deep to uncover the facts ???”

    “A good investigator looks at all the evidence to try to explain the known data. For example, we know that the documents were mailed in paper format to Orly Taitz and delivered to the Judge’s chambers. The former because she scanned them in the latter because document 35-0 tells us so.”

    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
    If you are suggesting that Orly Taitz created the page 4 altered LFCOLB PDF image which appeared for the first time in a four-page court filing document 35-1.pdf produced by Scott J. Tepper’s LA law firm then you’ve totally lost your marbles
    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

    “A good detective takes all these hints and facts and formulate a working hypothesis that best matches the data known so far.

    “It’s all part of good research.”

    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
    So then you must have compared the posting date of this Taitz creation with the creation date of Tepper’s document 35-1.pdf ?

    And the facts are ….

  6. If you are suggesting that Orly Taitz created the page 4 altered LFCOLB PDF image which appeared for the first time in a four-page court filing document 35-1.pdf produced by Scott J. Tepper’s LA law firm then you’ve totally lost your marbles

    Fortunately, that’s not what he’s suggesting.

  7. Fortunately, that’s not what he’s suggesting.

    Is Hermitian so unaware of the facts I have shown on my site? Does he even realize that Orly Taitz uploaded a scanned version of document 35-1 which was obviously delivered to her by mail.

    Hermitian may want to ask her about this and ask her to scan a higher resolution copy.

    I bet that the track marks at the bottom are not visible on her scan🙂

Comments are closed.