Mario Apuzzo, the “Black Night”

Mario

Despite the assistance that the Anti-Constitutionalists (the Obots) have received from some lower courts, they have lost the “natural born citizen” debate.

12 thoughts on “Mario Apuzzo, the “Black Night”

  1. Who? But that would be good for Mario. The reputation he has earned himself is not a very flattering one if you ask me.

  2. Just doing a drive-by and noticed it’s the same old song & dance from the Obots, just on a different day: ad hominem attacks rather than addressing a factual presentation.

  3. I notice that ramboike hasn’t commented on any of the approximately 25 posts in the last few weeks demonstrating how scanners and software can create the artifacts noticed in the various electronic copies of the LFBC.

  4. Not to mention that RumpRangerIck doesn’t even understand the meaning of an ad hominem attack. Look it up, clownboy. Hint: saying something negative about Mario “the Dolt” Apuzzo isn’t one.

  5. Mental midget Brown still shining where the sun don’t.

    From the dictionary: “Ad hominem attacks are often used in a debate or discussion where the speaker wishes to avoid the substance of the discussion and instead resorts to smearing the character of their opponent.”

    You opened by quoting above a video meant to smear the 1st paragraph of what Mario presented as an Obot red herring in a posting . Even if the smear was a true negative it’s still ad hominem attack on character when you don’t address the substance presented.

    I see this all the time when I’m engaging Obots.

    Hey maggot, you’re out of you league on this. Your forte is better suited to sending threatening emails to female attorneys.

  6. Hint: saying something negative about Mario “the Dolt” Apuzzo isn’t one.

    Eggzactly…

  7. Even if the smear was a true negative it’s still ad hominem attack on character when you don’t address the substance presented.

    There was no substance…

  8. Re: “There was no substance…”

    One would think that would be a hard sell to those that read your blog. Copied the 1st paragraph and pasted it above your video, but didn’t read what that 1st paragraph was attached to. Good luck on that

    i was just checking some of the Obot sites to see if there were any responses pointing out something that might have been overlooked – so far nothing.

  9. SueDB of Fogbow wrote:It’s just that it would take a huge amount of money for me to display the degree of dishonesty that Putzy [Mario Apuzzo] shows. If he’s not doing for the money then why the hell would anyone compromise his/her integrity to this degree? It one thing to do this in private, but in public and professionally, really now Putzy.

    Putzy is embarrassing himself again in a world wide forum whining again. He just can’t win for losing. Let’s see…. Obots 200 Birfers ZERO… hmmmmm…….

Comments are closed.