FL – Voeltz v Obama – FL Supreme Court – Docket

Case Number: SC13-560 – Active
MICHAEL VOELTZ vs. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ETC., ET AL.
Lower Tribunal Case(s): 1D12-3489, 2012-CA-00467

Date Docketed
Description
Filed By
Notes
03/12/2013 PETITION-MANDAMUS PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 FILED AS “NOTICE-APPEAL” & TREATED AS PETITION-MANDAMUS
03/25/2013 REQUEST-JUDICIAL NOTICE DA1 Scott Rille BY: DA1 Scott Rille FILED AS “LETTER DATED 03/18/2013″ ***STRICKEN. SEE ORDER DATED 05/02/2013***
04/08/2013 Fee Due $300, but not billed DCA FORWARDING FILING FEE
04/08/2013 ORDER-PROPER PETITION Petitioner’s notice, filed in this Court on March 12, 2013, has been treated as a petition for writ of mandamus seeking reinstatement of the proceedings in the district court of appeal below. Petitioner is allowed to and including April 29, 2013, in which to file a proper petition for writ of mandamus; that complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.100, addressing why the proceedings in the district court of appeal should not have been dismissed. The failure to file a proper petition with this Court within the time provided could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this case. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it may not be subject to reinstatement.
04/08/2013 ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE Supreme Court Florida FSC BY: Supreme Court Florida FSC
04/29/2013 PROPER PETITION PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220
05/02/2013 ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE Scott Rille’s letter dated March 18, 2013, has been treated as a Motion to Take Judicial Notice, and said motion is stricken without prejudice to re-file after a proper motion for amicus curiae has been filed with this Court.
05/09/2013 PETITION-AMENDMENT/SUPPLEMENT PT Michael Voeltz BY: PT Larry Elliot Klayman 246220 FILED AS “NOTICE-APPEAL”
05/17/2013 MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE DA1 Scott Rille BY: DA1 Scott Rille O&7
06/14/2013 ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE DY The “Motion for Leave to File Brief of Amicus Curiae” filed in the above cause by Scott Rille on behalf of petitioner is hereby denied.
About these ads