DC – Taitz v Astrue – Motion for reconsideration

Let this be filed…
Emergency MOTION for Reconsideration by ORLY TAITZ (Attachments: # 1 Letter to the Court)”Let this be filed along with the attached motions and documents.”, by Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth(rdj) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

One thought on “DC – Taitz v Astrue – Motion for reconsideration

  1. As Butterfly Bilderberg observes

    The appellate brief is supposed to argue why the District Court’s dismissal was erroneous as a matter of law. That requires the appellant(s) to argue, well, law.

    Not one word in this brief addresses the rationale behind Judge Carter’s dismissal nor why it was improper to dismiss a case over which he had no jurisdiction. The appellees can waive response and they will nevertheless prevail.

    A waste of paper.

    It’s at best a ‘fundraising letter’

Comments are closed.