VT – Paige v Obama – Apuzzo

Mario objects to the ruling

In discussing Ankeny, Judge Bent said that “‘natural born Citizen’ is not dependent on the nationality of the parents but reflects the status of a person born into citizenship instead of having citizenship subsequently bestowed. The distinction is eminently logical.” But upon close examination, this distinction is not logical at all. This argument is tantamount to arguing that any person who is a “citizen at birth” is a “natural born Citizen.”

Exactly, your point? Mario finally understands so now what? Calling it ‘not logical’ ? Poor Mario cannot accept the simple fact that Courts have found his ‘arguments’ to be wanting.