AK- Lamb v Obama – Deficiencies

Several entries on the docket, nothing unexpected…

10/12/2012 Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney Attorney: Pro per (0100001) Thomas A Lamb (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Lamb, Thomas A Case Motion #1

10/12/2012 Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney Attorney: Pro per (0100001) Thomas A Lamb (Plaintiff); Filing Party: Lamb, Thomas A Case Motion #2

10/15/2012 Notice of Deficient Filing(s) mailed re: expedited and underlying lack date of service, no signature on service, incorrect case number Notice of Deficient Filing(s) (Anchorage) Sent on: 10/15/2012 00:00:00.52

10/15/2012 Order Denying Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney ~ On October 11, 2012, Mr. Thomas Lamb filed a motion for expedited consideration of his motion for immediate disclosure of records. At a minimum, the motion is premature. Before the plaintiff’s motion could be considered, plaintiff must provide the court with legitimate Civil Rule 5 proof of service of the summons and complaint and the pending motions and supporting documents on defendants. Thus, the motion for expedited consideration is denied at this time. Lamb, Thomas A Case Motion #1 Motion for Expedited Consideration of: Plaintiff’s Motion for Immediate Disclosure of Records Pertaining to Presidential Candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney