DC – Taitz v Astrue – SCOTUS

Totally hilarious… She is applying for a stay of certification before there has been an actual election. SCOTUS will have a field day with this.. As to her foolish claims of SSN fraud etc, the Court will happily deny ruling on that. And that’s fortunate for Orly🙂

Oh how desperate Orly is getting.

But, come on, what self respecting lawyer would file such a foolish motion with SCOTUS and expect the Court to grant Cert? Orly will continue to fail and it will drive her up the wall.

Fascinating. Should she not be working on her RICO filing and response in the MS case? Or has she already abandoned any hope there? Would make sense, the Judge is ready to rule against her.

I am not sure if she will ever file this but there is nothing she can do to save this from disaster.

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES

 

___________________________________________________________________

TAITZ

V

ASTRUE

________________________________________________________________

 

APPLICATION FOR STAY OF CERTIFICATION OF THE 2012 VOTES FOR BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA PENDING CERTIORARI REVIEW BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE APPEAL OF THE FOIA CASE TAITZ V OBAMA, DEMANDING RELEASE UNDER FOIA OF SS-5 APPLICATION TO CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 042-68-4425, WHICH WHICH OBAMA IS USING ACCORDING TO HIS TAX RETURNS RELEASED BY OBAMA HIMSELF, BUT WHICH WAS NEVER ASSIGNED TO OBAMA ACCODING E-VERIFY AND SSNVS

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICATION FOR AN EMERGENCY STAY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE CIRCUIT OF COLUMBIA

case # 11-5304

___________________________________________________________________

DR. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ

___________________________________________________________________

QUESTIONS FOR THE COURT

1. Can the federal court allow usurpation of the U.S. Presidency by the foreign citizen, by sealing his records and aiding and abetting his use of a stolen Social Security number from a state, where he never resided.

2. Does criminality in the White House, use of a stolen social Security number by an individual occupying the position of the U.S. President represent a matter of public interest?

3. Can one claim privacy in a stolen Social Security number or any other stolen property for that matter?