Jimmy Clark did his best but the court was not impressed
The swearing in is important, not the filing…
Accepts the Stephenson case. Writ of prohibition denied.
Clark failed to take into consideration the clear rulings on this issue.
@39:45 – The Judge points out how the de-facto and de-jure officer case law have been recently developed to apply.
Clark: You cannot become a de-jure officer after the fact
Judge: Are you rejecting the case law?
Clark: Ignoring the question… “The law is clear”… Well, the law is not that clear to Clark perhaps?
Clark is still arguing what he wants the law to be, not what it really is. And the Judge understands.
Hoyt reports on Trussell.
Hoyt wonders about this ‘injustice’ but fails to understand that Trussell was trying to play sovcit games and the Judge was not going to have anything to do with it.
He wants to know ‘why’ and the answer is simple…
Listen here, and hear how prayers did not really work.
Why can they not talk to you like you are a human being? Because they do not want to engage in Terry’s sovereign citizen nonsense.
As Mimi pointed out, Terry was playing games
The judge asks if Terry Tussell is in the courtroom. Trussell stands and sez ‘i am here to speak to that matter’. Judge asks ‘are you terry trussell’. Trussell sez ‘i am a living, breathing, natural man’ or other majik words that didn’t seem to work on the judge?
Thanks to Hoyt recording the audio in court even though he had been told that he could not do so… @5:40
In the rest of the Hoyt recording you can hear more about the Sovcit myths. They were not calling the man, they were calling the legal fiction. ROTFL… And so the Sovcit myth goes on and Terry continues to wonder why his magic words do not work. The upper case Terry was not there, the proper man of God was there… So cute…
The BAR is an English scheme…
Boots on the ground have reported that Terry’s bond was revoked after he announced he was present, in corporate and in man. It’s very likely that the Judge did not want to play Sovcit games and ruled that he had failed to appear and revoked his bond.
So much for trying to avoid justice…
Let’s see if there are updates on the web…
More and more details are emerging which suggest that Terry went full Sovcit on the court
“Patriots for America” reports that:
Terry Trussell appeared in front of Judge Hankinson’s Kangaroo court for arraignment this morning at the Dixie County Court House. When called by the Judge Hankinson Mr. Trussell responded “I’m here to address this matter.” Judge Hankinson refused to recognize him because he was in the audience, not before the bar, declared he failed to appear in court and said he was issuing a bench warrant for failure to appear. The judge fled the court declaring it in recess having the person he said “failed to appear in court” arrested on the spot.
Quick to call a real court a Kangaroo court, they do report that Terry refused to appear before the court. Poor Terry continues to dig himself deeper and deeper.
What a mess of his own creation and the Judge is not taking any nonsense.
Supreme Court of Alabama in McInnish v. Chapman: denied
Also denied was Rudy v.Lee (with amicus brief by Herb Titus).
HT: Dr Conspiracy
A somewhat strange article, even for BR standards, has appeared on Birther Report describing the travels and adventures of Paul Guthrie aka ‘Jedi Pauly’.
The report ‘concludes’, probably erroneously, that the UK agrees with Guthrie’s interpretation of nbC:
Thus he courageously made his way to England a few days ago, on Oct 1st. As soon as he arrived in London, he made claim for the protection of political asylum, and the first thing that happened was that the U.K. Immigration officials agreed with his assessment, that Obama is not a natural born Citizen, on that basis accepting his application for the asylum process. A governmental authority in the U.K. has determined that Obama does not meet the Article II natural born Citizenrequirements! This is another victory!
Yes, it surely was a victory when they decided to detain him in a Removal Centre and fast-track his application.
The judge denies Clark’s filings and observes that his claims that the Judges were usurping their offices because they had not timely filed their oaths. Citing State v. Stephenson, 89 Wn.App. 794, 808, 950 P.2d 38 (1998), the judge rejected Clark’s claims:
 Oath – Judges – Oath of Office – Filed With Secretary of State – Necessity. Under RCW 2.08.080, the filing of an oath with the Secretary of State is not a condition precedent to assuming the duties of a superior court judge; nor does a failure to file the oath disqualify a superior court judge from office.