Slash2k from the Fogbow scores again. Montgomery starts at page 84
KS – 2012-09-13 - Transcript of Proceedings of State Objection Board
Montgomery totally misunderstands US v Wong Kim Ark and other SCOTUS rulings. I love it how he cites the dissenting opinion as if it has any legal relevance.
Orly has been asking her minions to volunteer to collect a complete list of witnesses and experts. Her former paralegal assistant has left due to personal circumstance but I find it hard to believe that Orly does not have a list of all her witnesses and experts, including their addresses and phone numbers… Fascinating.. I thought this was an emergency of national proportions… She must expect what we already have predicted: namely that the judge will not allow any of her witnesses to testify.
I NEED HELP OF VOLUNTEERS
Posted on | October 1, 2012 | No Comments
I need to compile a list of all the witnesses and experts for subpoena. I need their addresses and phone numbers, e-mail addresses. I need to submit to the judge.
Orly was punked once again:
…Plaintiff Taitz then stated that she represented “Mountgomery Burns” and that he wished to withdraw his withdrawal……Mr Montgomery did not appear with Plaintiff Taitz nor did “Mr Mountgomery Burns”
Montgoumery Burns… Homer must be laughing…
As to the motions, they point out why the Court lacks jurisdiction and why the hearing for injunctive relief should be stayed…
2012-09-26 KS SCDC – TAITZ v KOBACH – Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum
2012-09-26 KS SCDC – TATIZ v KOBACH – Exhibits to Motion to Dismiss
2012-09-26 KS SCDC – TAITZ v KOBACH – Motion to Stay Hearing