Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-0234-SEB-DKL – Entry and Order Dismissing Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
PAUL A. GUTHRIE,
Plaintiff,
VS. 1:13-cv-0234-SEB-DKL
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, et al.,
Defendants.

Entry and Order Dismissing Action

I

Paul A. Guthrie commenced this action shortly after a prior action docketed as Guthrie v. Obama, etal., No. 1:13-cv-0080-JMS-DKL (S.D.Ind. Jan. 18, 2013)(hereafter “the prior action”) was dismissed. Upon its initial examination of this case, the court noted that “[t]he plaintiff is recycling claims put to rest” in the prior action. The plaintiff was given a period of time in which to show cause why the present action should not be summarily dismissed “for the same reasons.”

The plaintiff has responded to the foregoing directions by asserting that the disposition of the prior action was invalid. This apparently explains why he has tried again and this time has added Judge Magnus-Stinson as a defendant.

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-0234-SEB-DKL- MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

1) Defendant Obama was placed on all 50 State ballots, unlawfully selected in an illegal fraudulent election, and unlawfully installed and maintained in the Office of President once in 2008/09 and again in 2012/13, contrary to the Constitution because Obama is not a natural born Citizen of the United States of America. He was selected and installed despite numerous protests in dozens of court challenges, stemming from before both Presidential elections, claiming that Obama was not and is not a natural born Citizen, as required by Article II of the Constitution of the United States of America. Not one court case before this one has stated the correct definition and meaning of Article II natural born Citizen, the discovered Natural Law Theory of the Father definition, as all previous cases relied upon the provably incorrect Unity Theory (of both U.S. soil territory jurisdiction birth and both parents must be U.S. citizens, all inclusive), or the government’s Positive Law Theory definition (U.S. soil jurisdiction birth, or mother is a U.S. citizen, inclusive or mutually exclusive, either one will do according to the government as long as a State citizen father is not a factor in the creation of the natural born Citizen offspring or natural born Citizen status.)

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-0234-SEB-DKL – MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

1) Plaintiff Guthrie filed his case [number 1:13 -CV- 0234 SEB – DKL] and made service of process upon the defendants, with the last defendant being served on March 4, 2013. The Proof of Service verification for all of the defendants has been filed with the Court. Not counting the day of March 4, then 21 days from the time the defendants were served expires at the end of the day March 26, 2013.

2) It is now more than 21 days and there has been no reply from the defendants. Guthrie is now entitled to a default judgment. Here is the language in the Summons served upon the defendants that describes the rules of civil procedure regarding the time allotted for a reply to plaintiff’s suit and the consequences for failure to respond:
A lawsuit has been filed against you. Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3), you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff, whose name and address are:

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – case 1:13-CV-0234-SEB-DKL – MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

MOTION FOR ORDER TO COMPEL PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

1) Every one of the defendants, by virtue of their employment in their offices, has a duty to know what an Article II natural born Citizen is and whether or not Obama is one, in order to establish whether or not the defendants are valid representatives of the constitutional government engaged in lawful duties on behalf of the American People, so as not to be defrauding the American People and so that they can properly do their jobs and enforce the criminal codes and Constitution. Furthermore, if the defendants did not know or comprehend what a natural born Citizen was before they received Guthrie’s complaint, by the facts presented therein they certainly now know what a natural born Citizen is and that Obama is not one.

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL – Complaint

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Paul A. Guthrie, in propria persona,
(A.K.A. General Jedi Pauly)
Plaintiff
VS.
United States of America;
Barrack Hussein Obama II, the alleged President of the United States, of America, and individually;
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., the alleged Vice President of the United States of America, and individually;
Martin Dempsey, the alleged Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Office of the President of the United States of America, and individually, Eric Holder, the alleged Attorney General of the United States of America, and individually, Hillary Rodham Clinton, the alleged Secretary of the United States of America, and individually, Elena Kagan, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually, Sonia Sotomayor, the alleged Supreme Court Justice of the United States of America, and individually, United States Congress; United States Senate; US. House of Representatives; et aL;
Defendants

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00234-SEB-DKL – Docket

U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-00234-SEB-DKL
GUTHRIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Assigned to: Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue
Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Date Filed: 02/11/2013
Date Terminated: 05/08/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Continue reading

Guthrie v US – 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL – Docket

U.S. District Court
Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL
GUTHRIE v. OBAMA et al
Assigned to: Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue
Demand: $9,999,000
Cause: 28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Date Filed: 01/14/2013
Date Terminated: 01/18/2013
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 540 Mandamus & Other
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Continue reading