MOTION to the Court to Inform the Grand Jury by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 01/31/2012)
Sibley believes that he has a right to be heard by the Grand Jury… Again, he may want to familiarize himself with the law and legal precedents.
Motion below the fold
 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 05/11/2012)
Sibley argues that the defendants are holding contradictory opinions. But he confuses two very different situations. In one the DC Court was asked to address the preliminary findings by the board that President Obama was eligible and the argument was that such a finding did not qualify as an administrative hearing or adjudication Sibley raised D.C. Official Code § 11-722 (2001) which was found to not apply. In addition, Sibley may have failed to properly raise the issue as he had failed to participate in the (primary) vote and was thus not eligible under under D.C. Official Code § 1-1001-11. However, the court does have jurisdiction to hear the case under DC Code, just not in case of Sibley in this specific primary election. Nothing would have prevented Sibley from filing a complaint under under D.C. Official Code § 1-1001-11 with the DC Court of Appeals:
(b) (1) Within 7 days after the Board certifies the results of an election, any person who voted in the election may petition the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to review the election. The Court’s authority to review the results of an election shall include initiative, referendum, and recall measures as well as elections for a particular office.
(2) In response to such a petition, the Court may set aside the results certified and declare the true results of the
election, or void the election in whole or in part. To determine the true results of an election, the Court may order a recount or take other appropriate action, whether or not a recount has been conducted or requested pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. The Court shall void an election only if it:
(A) Determines that the candidate certified as the winner of the election does not meet the qualifications required for office; or
Source: D.C. Code 1-1001.11
 NOTICE of Filing Rule 201 Necessary Information by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 02/13/2012)
Where Sibley asks the Court to take judicial notice of the proceedings in Judge Malihi’s court. If he had only known about the ruling at that time <g>
 ORDER denying 3 plaintiff’s motion for the CM/ECF password and to conduct pre-trial discovery and 15 his request for oral argument; denying 5 plaintiff’s amended certified petition for writs quo warranto and mandamus and request for declaratory relief and damages; denying 6 plaintiff’s motion to inform the grand jury; and granting 12 defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint. See text of Order for details. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/6/2012. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
Sibley had filed motions requesting CM/ECF access, oral arguments, etc which the court all denied.
 NOTICE of Vacation by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY. “Leave to File GRANTED,” Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 2/23/2012. (dr) (Entered: 02/24/2012)
The country is facing this constitutional crisis and our friend Sibley is taking a vacation? What was he thinking…
 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge John D. Bates on 6/6/2012. (lcjdb2) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
An order from the Court of Appeals. Apparently Sibley was not too happy with the speed of the proceedings and filed a motion with the COA.
 USCA ORDER (USCA Case Number 12-5040). Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, fora writ procedendum ad justicium, it is ORDERED that the petition be denied. The district courts delay in ruling on the petition for writ of quo warranto is not so egregious or unreasonable as to warrant the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. (kb) (Entered: 03/07/2012)
Sibley announces that he is going on vacation and what does this judge do? Realizing that even Sibley understands this is not an urgent issue, he denies the petition for writ of mandamus.
Tell me that you did not see that one coming?…
 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 19 Memorandum & Opinion, 18 Order on Motion to Expedite, Order on Motion for CM/ECF Password, Order on Motion for Discovery, Order on Motion for Hearing, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Order on Motion to Dismiss, by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 4616049283. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Parties have been notified. (dr) (Entered: 06/19/2012)
 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 03/08/2012)
If Sibley can go on vacation, then the defendants should have some extra time :-)
 Transmission of the Notice of Appeal, Order Appealed, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals fee was paid this date re 20 Notice of Appeal. (dr) (Entered: 06/19/2012)
 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) by BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 03/09/2012)
 ORDER of USCA as to 20 Notice of Appeal, filed by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY ; ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. USCA Case Number 12-5198. (md, ) (Entered: 12/12/2012)
 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint by JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Soskin, Eric) (Entered: 04/02/2012)
Sibley is way in over his head. This is a beautiful, well written motion with appropriate references to relevant court rulings.
More below the fold
 MANDATE of USCA (certified copy) as to 20 Notice of Appeal, filed by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY ; ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. USCA Case Number 12-5198. (md, ) (Entered: 02/08/2013)
 Case Reassigned to Judge John D. Bates. Judge Amy Berman Jackson no longer assigned to the case. (jeb, ) (Entered: 01/06/2012)
 AMENDED NOTICE of Vacation by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (rdj) (Entered: 04/05/2012)
Sibley is going on vacation a month later… So much for the rush…
LETTER filed  by the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States notifying this court of the following activity in the case before it: A petition for writ of certiorari was filed and placed on the docket on 12/14/2012 as No. 12-736. [12-5198]
MOTION to Expedite disposition, MOTION for CM/ECF Password, MOTION to conduct pre-service Discovery, MOTION for oral argument by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (jf, ) (Entered: 01/11/2012)
 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 12 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, MOTION for Leave to File Oversized Opposition by MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY (dr) (Entered: 04/10/2012)
Sibley needs more time and more space…