Orly and failed reading comprehension

Orly posted the following embarrassing posting about one of her cases in which she lost, again, to an empty chair. She appears to be unable to parse the meaning of ‘recover cost’…


Dr Conspiracy quickly corrected her mistake and Orly pulled the embarrassing posting but luckily Dr C had captured the above screenshot…

Dr C explains:

The article on the Taitz site is gone this morning. I think the importance of retaining my article is not to leave a monument to how clueless Orly Taitz is, but rather to give a possible example of the kind of error she makes that contributes to her being the conspiracy theorist she is—the lack of a high-functioning nonsense filter. Orly Taitz expressed surprise that she should lose her case and the other side have to pay costs—recognizing something that makes no sense whatever; nevertheless, the way her mind works, that recognition of nonsense was not strong enough to effect a change in behavior and to  prevent an embarrassing mistake.

Orly continues to exhibit poor reading and comprehension skills (note that English is not her native tongue), leading to many embarrassing moments.

Quite educational…

Follow up: Orly also embarrasses herself on Facebook

orly FB

Orly clowning around with FOIA

Second FOIA request for information sent to Dori Salcedo, Chief FOIA officer of Department of Health and Human Services. HHS is obligated to respond by January 27, 2014 and provide information whether Obama is indeed enrolled in spite of his use of a stolen SSN and what safeguards were placed by Sebelius and HHS to prevent illegal aliens and others from enrolling in ACA (Obamacare) while using stolen and fabricated Social Security numbers

She is asking for a published document and for data which are exempt from FOIA. What a fail… And she still cannot send it to the correct address.

Really, Orly sends off 100+ pages of drivel but fails to make anything that seems to be relevant to FOIA.

Par for the course… That’s why we love her as she manages to misdirect and keep the birthers busy doing nothing. Soros would be proud.

Vogt debunked – 20 Shades of Vogt

And excellent overview of Vogt and his ‘arguments’ by Frank Arduini. A fascinating read indeed.

And I get a shoutout… So heart warming ;-)

It is important to stress again that according to the “official” workflow this is the only point at which the analog paper is converted into a digital image. Therefore, all of the digital “anomalies” flogged by birthers must, if the certificate is authentic, be explained by this single step. A simple Xerox Workcentre workflow has been conclusively shown to account for all the alleged digital “anomalies” in the Whitehouse.gov PDF. It was discovered and comprehensively proved in a tour de force of amateur forensic research by a team of anti-birther bloggers lead by “nbc” of the Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored blog at http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/. Although rejected out of hand by most birthers, no serious challenge to the Xerox workflow has ever been publicly offered by any advocate of the forgery theory.

HI – Taitz v. Hawai’ian Memorial Park Mortuary – Order to show cause

Orly is getting ready for another legal slap down…

Predictable… The judge wants Orly to explain why she has standing in this matter. Another failure by Orly… She cannot even properly file a case. It’s either lack of standing, lack of proper service that seems to get her most of the times.

6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED – Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 12/23/13. Show Cause Response due by 1/10/2014. “Taitz may respond to this order to show cause in writing no later than January 10, 20 14. If the court receives no response by the deadline, the case will be automatically dismissed. Taitz may, of course, “moot out” this order to show cause by voluntarily dismissing the Complaint. If the court dismisses this action for lack of jurisdiction, no further order regarding the motion seeking injunctive relief will issue.

Continue reading

Is birtherism dead? Taitz moving on ?

Even Orly appears to have abandoned her foolish attempts and is now moving to file cases in which judges applied our Constitution when ruling in favor of same sex marriage.

While she does not appear to understand our Constitution (she is from Moldavia after all), she more foolishly believes that she can somehow sue in Utah and Colorado, and worse, that she can sue federal judges. She is so clueless. Her latest filing in Colorado fails to even get close to standing. Worse, she is not even filing as a pro-se and thus needs to be admitted for practice in Colorado before she could proceed.

I am not sure why she wants to deny same sex couples the same Constitutional rights extended to others, but she does seem to have grown tired of her continued failures in pursuing her follies against President Obama. Needless to say, she will be equally effective in her new venture as she has been in most anything she has done.

There is a God after all ;-)

Orly– hitting a new low.

Press Release: Mortuary director Virginia Donato states that the family refuses to confirm that the body of Loretta Fuddy will not be cremated on Saturday. Emergency petition for a stay/preliminary injunction of cremation was filed with the US District Court in Honolulu

Orly totally has lost total sense of reason and decency…And she has the gall to ask for donations… Have the continuous failures finally caused her to ‘snap’?

Of course, given Orly’s legal failures, I have no doubt that by the time she sorts out how to properly file such an injunction, it will be late 2014…

Orly used to be entertaining in his inabilities to deal with legal issues, and her legal failures, however her latest antics have become totally indecent and I hope that Dr Fuddy’s family sues Orly for intentional infliction of emotional distress…

Vogt spilling txe beans?

Vogt has been giving several interviews in which he has dropped sufficient hints to determine who he believes to be the forger. And while I am not going to make the name public, Dr Conspiracy and AnitaMaria at the Fogbow, have put the pieces together in an almost trivial manner.

I would like to focus on the claim about the TXE in the stamp since much has been made about the distorted H and yet few have noticed how the same distortion appears in a long form birth certificate obtained by Miki Booth dated March 15, 2011, a few weeks before Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate was stamped (April 25, 2011).

The document in question shows, as pointed out by Butterdezillion, of all people, that there are other ‘distorted’ stamps, certified close in time to President Obama’s.

Butterdezillion: The smiley face and TXE are anomalies but they don’t make sense for a forger to put in a document. Whoever forged the BC would have just used what the HDOH sent, changing nothing except what had to be changed because it exposed the non-valid status of the BC and anything that they thought they screwed up on when making the forgery – like the background pattern. So it seems likely to me that Onaka used the TXE stamp and put the smiley face on the BC and the WH forger dutifully copied it without thinking that it was a red flag put in there by Onaka himself. It escaped Fuddy’s eyes, and it escaped the forger’s eyes.

Again, Vogt has failed, but I believe that his identification of the ‘forger’ has been his worst failure, especially given the fact that a Xerox workcentre workflow explains almost all the artifacts. Is this why Zullo spent 3 weeks in Hawaii?

What is truly hilarious is the following exchange

Hagmann:From my point of view as an investigator, you don’t announce, you don’t telegraph, you don’t post on a blog. You know.

Vogt: “You leave your ego out of it.”

Hagmann: “Exactly”



HT: Gorefan @DrConspiracy

How Vogt ‘spilled the beans’ and telegraphed the ‘forger’


Sibley strikes again

Sibley writes:

Saturday, November 30, 2013
In Re: Douglas Vogt – Part III

In response, Doug has now filed an extraordinary pejorative Writ of Mandamus asking that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal order Judge Robart to “do his duty” in those three regards. Each “duty” presents a Hobson’s Choice for the Ninth Circuit. (A Hobson’s choice is a free choice in which only one option is offered.)

Perhaps he meant prerogative although pejorative does appear to describe the petition much better imho.

Expect a simple denial in a few weeks. There is no foundation for an extraordinary writ of mandamus, and there is no support for criminal behavior on the part of the court, who merely gave Vogt the choice to either file a complaint or have his submission be ignored and filed under miscellaneous filings. Assuming that Vogt intended to file a miscellaneous case, he failed to provide sufficient reason as to why the case should have been filed as such. Regardless, the court would have found in either instance, that Vogt lacked standing and thus the suit would be dismissed.

See http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-hid-1_13-cv-00578/pdf/USCOURTS-hid-1_13-cv-00578-0.pdf


If Riddle intended to simply file a miscellaneous case giving this type of notice, then there is nothing more for this court to do, and this case should be administratively terminated.

Riddle v. Internal Revenue Service, Dist. Court, D. Oregon 2004

The Court and the Clerk realized that the notice had no legal relevance unless Vogt were to file a real legal complaint, otherwise, it would be a document that it could ignore or decide to file as a miscellaneous filing and ignore it. In an effort to help the plaintiff, the clerk advised him to file the document appropriately. This was done in several cases relating to the American Grand Jury petitions.

Miscellaneous case numbers are normally assigned to a variety of matters filed with the court which are not considered a civil case. They are ancillary and supplementary proceedings not defined as a civil action. If the miscellaneous case is contested before a district judge, it then receives a civil case number. Miscellaneous cases could be directly or indirectly related to a case, such as an application to perpetuate testimony as defined in Rule 27, Fed.R.Civ.P., Etc. Miscellaneous actions require resolution through the judicial system.

  1. A filing fee is required.
  2. Filings in a miscellaneous case must follow the same guidelines set out in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and our Local Rules.

For the Federal Circuit of Western WA

Filing a Miscellaneous Action

For help, please contact
the Clerk’s Office

206-370-8400 (Seattle)
253-882-3800 (Tacoma)

In this court the Miscellaneous mantle covers a large variety of cases. All supplemental proceedings in a federal post judgment action, such as a garnishment or debtor exam, become a miscellaneous case.

To determine if a case is a miscellaneous matter.

  • It is an action which does not qualify as a civil case, OR
  • It is an action which requires the decision of a U.S. district court judge, or magistrate judge, such as disbursement of a deceased seaman’s personal effects or perpetuation of testimony.

Miscellaneous cases cannot be opened on CM/ECF by the attorney or pro se party. They must either be delivered to the courthouse in person, via mail, or electronically through our e-mail box for new case filings (newcases.seattle@wawd.uscourts.gov or newcases.tacoma@wawd.uscourts.gov). Please be aware that some cases require certified copies for the court and may not be transmitted electronically. The filing fee for a miscellaneous action is $46.00.

The Clerk’s Office cannot tell you what documents you need to file for your case, but we will assist you in understanding the filing procedures. Some examples of miscellaneous actions are:

  • Motion to Compel or Quash a Foreign Subpoena
  • Applications for Writs of Garnishment
  • Judgment Debtor Examinations
  • Registrations of Foreign Judgments
  • Notices of Receivership

Educating the Confused – TN Grand Jury

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=441363 :evil:

Shocking admission: Jury foreman in TN is not a juror randomely selected from the pool of jurors, but a government puppet, which was appointed by the regime. so, not only we have judges that are influenced by the regime, we also have juries that are influenced by the regime through the appointed foremen. Total deprivation of rights

Posted on | November 28, 2013 | No Comments

Rigged: CDR Fitzpatrick Vindicated; Grand Jury Tampering & Judicial Misconduct

Blockbuster Exclusive: State of Tennessee: Grand Jury Foremen Are Not Jurors! IN CONTRADICT

Honestly?… How long did it take these geniuses to figure out that which courts have already ruled? Rondeau, Orly, Fitzpatrick are all clueless…

Continue reading

Orly’s ‘happy thanksgiving’

Orly is unhappy again because the judges are so mean to her..

Judge Lamberth pardons Indonesian-Kenyan turkey without 1 word of explanation. As usual Judge Lamberth picks a holiday to give a present to Obama and stick it to every american

Nope, just to you Orly, just to you. You filed a 60B2 motion untimely, even though you tried to turn it into a 60B6 motion, the judge clearly understood what you were trying to do.

Happy thanksgiving Orly…

Oh and Orly… Keep up your good work and perfect record…

Oh and that request for a Vaughn Index? Hilarious… You really cannot read, can you?

Vogt ‘appeals’ with a petition for writ of mandamus

Vogt, or rather his ghost writer Montgomery Blair Sibley (author of the PDF) has now petitioned the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal for a writ of mandamus. He insists that the court issues three writs of mandamus:

[Dr Conspiracy has a fascinating post as well]

(i) correct the docket in the District Court to accurately reflect the proceedings below, (ii) acknowledge Vogt’s discharge of his obligations under the Misprision statutes, and (iii) in so much as the “public interest so requires”, summon a grand jury to hear Vogt’s forensic evidence which demonstrates that the Certificates of Live Birth (“COLBs”) proffered by Barack Hussein Obama, II (“Obama”) to prove his eligibility to be President are indisputably forgeries.

Let me predict why they will fail again.

Continue reading

Has the CCP abandoned the birth certificate forgery claims?

In a Gallups interview we learn from our favorite clown ‘investigator’ that:

That whole notion of a Xerox 7655 copier is out the window.

That is nothing more than another red herring.

We will annihilate it when that time comes.

In other words, they have nothing to rebut, and have moved onwards to new claims. This time even more “overwhelming“. Or in other words, we are still digging and have found nothing.

May we therefor conclude that they have either not done the research I outlined or that they have done so and concluded that it was accurate?

Oh yes, and they claim that the Maricopa county Sheriff’s office is  deeply involved with other aspects of this… In other words, nothing is happening…

Fascinating how they continue to report on nothing… And how they spend all this time addressing ‘obots’ whose findings they claim, are nothing more than a red herring.

Who are they think they are fooling :-)

Read more at the Fogbow

WA – in Re: Vogt – Order to Show Cause

The judge wants to know why he should not reject the filing due to lack of jurisdiction and standing. Excellent order… Predictable…

Because Mr. Vogt’s claims under 18 U.S.C. § 4 and 18 U.S.C. § 2382 are not legally cognizable, it appears that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider Mr. Vogt’s claims. See Cobble, 2009 WL 34 23444, at *3; Pankey, 816 F. Supp. at 559.




WA – in Re: Vogt

A very strange lawsuit has been filed by Douglas Vogt, self described expert. Has he lost faith in the Clown Car Posse?

The Court, after wiping the tears from its eyes, having read the documents, will quickly dismiss the case.

Amateurs… AnitaMaria at the Daily Kos reports on the latest follies and Dr Conspiracy has his own thoughts in this hilarious event.

Full docket here

10/18/2013 1 COMPLAINT against defendant(s) (NO Summons(es) issued) (Receipt # SEA 59616), filed by Douglas Vogt. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(PM) (Entered: 10/21/2013)

10/18/2013 2 AFFIDAVIT OF DOUGLAS VOGT filed by Plaintiff Douglas Vogt. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit pages 51-72, # 2 Exhibits 1-21 to Affidavit)(PM) (Entered: 10/21/2013)

10/18/2013 3 MOTION to FILE SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Douglas Vogt. (Attachments: # 1 SEALED AFFIDAVIT, # 2 EXHIBITS 1-14 TO SEALED AFFIDAVIT, # 3 Proposed Order)(PM) (Entered: 10/21/2013)

10/18/2013 4 MEMORANDUM of LAW filed by Plaintiff Douglas Vogt IN SUPPORT OF 3[RECAP] MOTION to Seal document (PM) (Entered: 10/21/2013)

Reality Check – We accept your challenge Mr Zullo

Reality check has challenged Mr Zullo

What will Zullo do? He can chose to show how a ‘criminal investigation’ deals with information that contradicts its findings, or he can ignore it.

Either way, Zullo is faced with quite an unfortunate situation of his own creation.

Continue reading

The Cold Case Posse – Failed conclusions March 1 2012

— Or the end of a ‘god of the gaps’ argument —

The Cold Case Posse released the following document on March 1, 2012 as a preliminary release of their findings. In it, its experts outline how they reached a conclusion of “forgery”. Note that they never really identified a ‘forger’ other than by claiming that regular scanning processes would not create specific artifacts.

Zullo appears to have understood this when he issued a challenge to show how a simple workflow would indeed create artifacts similar to the ones found in the WH Long Form Birth Certificate.

Continue reading

Epecticus – Evaluating the CCP’s position of ‘no concern’

At the Fogbow, Epecticus has provided us with a nice overview that may also be relevant to Mark Gillar’s efforts to save the investigation:

Just for fun. I went back and reviewed the first MCCCP Press Conference from March 1, 2012… listening specifically for the “evidence” Zullo and Gillar cited for the purposes of declaring the document a fraud. There were exactly five:

[NBC: Great idea, it's time to review the CCP's position during this press conference.]

1. The layers did not look like or exist in the large number they did on their “control document.”

2. The date stamp and registrar’s stamp could be moved about the document in one piece each.

3. The unequal distribution of “noise” across the document. (Here, they actually meant the difference in resolution between the background JPEG and the monochrome bitmasks. But being to incompetent to understand what was happening there, they just called it “noise.” This was, by the way, originally a Zebest mistake.)

4. The white halos.

5. The fact that the green background was all on a single layer rather than broken up across many different layers.

More specifically, Gillar says in the 5th “Conclusion” video that “Please note that the issue we are most concerned with is that of the date stamp and the Registrar’s stamp which appear to have been imported from unknown outside sources. For if the date stamp and the Registrar’s stamp which are placed on the document to give it authenticity are fraudulent then the entire document is fraudulent.”

[NBC: Gillar probably will have to drop this finding... Well Mark...]

It goes without saying at this point that each and every one of those concerns has been dispatched by NBC’s Xerox/Preview workflow. Now… this is where it get’s good.

Early on in the presser, Zullo says, “Going forward, our methodology was to look at this document and to validate this document. In other words, all we wanted to do was look at this information, reproduce what was in this document, and then move on. If we could reproduce it, there truly is no issue.”

Only through their own incompetence as investigators were they unable to reproduce it.

There truly is no issue.

[NBC: Our findings our of no concern to them... Yeah right...]