Just as Mara Zebest and others have shown for the White House Long Form Birth Certificate, the Xerox 7655 scan also contains layers and a clipping path.
Zebest: In addition to the nine sub-layer objects, a clipping path is at the top of the sub-layer list. The clipping path groups all the remaining sub-layers below.
Mara also may want to revise her claim that:
Zebest: At the risk of sounding like a broken record, this is not normal, unless the document has been compiled digitally.
Technically speaking, she is correct, the document was compiled digitally by combining foreground layers with a background layer, but it was all done by the software.
2013-07-19 – Taitz v DPM, et al. – Taitz Corrected Response to Judge Wingate
Mark at the Fogbow responds to Orly’s response to Begley et al filing a notice that she had failed in Grinols v Electoral College. Orly somehow forgot that Judge England distinguished Grinols from Lindsey, which is really not that hard to do. She has filed an appeal with the 9th Circuit Court and is trying to have the two cases merged but they are quite unrelated… But Orly’s response is totally outrageous and may attract the attention of the Court…
“Currently both Lindsey and Grinols cases are being heard by the 9th Circuit, as the rulings are diametrically opposite and attorneys for the defense acted unethically by not providing the judge Lindsey decision. Attorneys for Obama and the Democratic Party of MS in the case at hand Sam Begley and Scott J. Tepper are flagrantly violating professional ethics by providing Hon. Judge Wingate with Grinols opinion while hiding from him Lindsey opinion, for which they should be sanctioned.”
Apparently Orly ignored footnote 7 from Judge Englund’s opinion:
“At the hearing, Plaintiffs relied heavily on a recently decided Eastern District of California case, Peace and Freedom Party v. Bowen. Although Plaintiffs discussed the case at the MTD hearing, Plaintiffs failed to include it in any of their filings. Neither California Defendants nor Federal Defendants could discuss the case as they learned about it on the spot. Moreover, even though Peace and Freedom Party has no precedential weight by this Court, the Court finds it distinguishable from the present action.”
Orly has filed yet another FOIA request and Dan Lacey is getting good free advertising (NBC: viewer discretion advised) for his work
Orly Taitz Pancake Birther Paintings (NBC: viewer discretion advised)
by Dan Lacey
as cited by Dr. Taitz in various legal filings
FOIA request to the IRS seeking information on any action taken in response to a criminal complaint by attorney Orly Taitz
he finishes with a hilarious
Thanks to George Soros for the continued financial support.
Expect that to show up in one of Orly’s filings anytime soon. She has no sense of understanding sarcasm… Oh and Orly, gullible is not in the dictionary…
Orly has filed a suit she has not publicized. She filed the case in the name of “Defend our Freedoms Foundation” but the court quickly realized that Orly was not admitted to the Bar of the Court and could therefore not be the ‘lawyer’ on the case… ROTFL. As to the case, Orly is trying to figure out how the DOJ figured out her bank accounts when it threatened to do its j0b and collect on the $20,000 sanctions… No wonder she is trying to keep this low key. They threatened to put a lien on her house, and her actions ruined her credit and caused her ‘embarrassment’ when the bank employees figured out what was going on.
The Fogbow strikes…
Background information: In Taitz v Astrue, Orly filed a FOIA lawsuit which the court dismissed, she consequently appealed her case, where it was similarly dismissed.
She is now trying to reopen the case using a Rule 60B(2) motion but she is apparently unfamiliar with the rules.
c. Defense is mistaken about the motion being late under 60B(2). The original decision by this court was appealed to the court of Appeals. The court of Appeals did not issue it’s mandate until August of 2012, so the plaintiff has a year since the mandate, until August of 2013, therefore she is not late filing her motion for reconsideration.
The rules are clear
A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time—and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.
And Orly filed her motion with the court which denied her motion far more than one year ago. As usually, Orly is doing too little, too late. Fascinating…
In her report Mara Zebest writes
I, Mara Zebest, am preparing this report at the request of Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office in support of the Cold Case Posse investigation.
The PDF birth certificate document released by the White House (shown in Figure 1) is a completely manufactured and fabricated computer generated image. The same source file was used to print a copy handed to the AP (shown in Figure 2), in which the AP scanned in the version handed to them. A third photograph version (Figure 3) was touted by Savannah Guthrie who claimed to have held and felt the seal on the document, but the original Internet posted images have been scrubbed.
The White House wants us to believe the PDF document started out in printed form on security paper retrieved from Hawaii—but this is not possible. All three versions manifest itself as a printed document only when the PRINT button is pressed from within the original manufactured document file. This would account for the transformation of a document containing different color backgrounds, and the ability to print with or without safety paper pattern (by turning a layer on or off ).
There is no doubt in my mind that this computer generated image never started out as a paper source document and was never scanned in as described by the White House—it was digitally created and manufactured.
Orly has once again done it: She now has filed a FOIA lawsuit against the United Postal Service. Why? Because she filed a FOIA request early June and believes that they have failed to respond within the statutory 20 working days. Note that the 20 days start from the time the document is delivered at the appropriate FOIA site.
Orly also filed hundreds of pages of irrelevant information, which may have further complicated matters.
The United States Government failed to furnish an opposition or a response to the motion for reconsideration seeking SS-5, Social Security application for Social Security number REDACTED which was assigned to Harrison J. Bounel and which Obama is fraudulently using.
When there is a default on a case it is the same as a pleading of “No Contest.” By not showing up and defending themselves is a blatant admission of guilt. This is going to get very interesting in the coming weeks…
Sigh… People really should learn more about our legal system before making such foolish assertions.
Dr Conspiracy has a nice selection of postings on Douglas Vogt
Douglas Vogt testified in Georgia, the judge was not impressed
“The Court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support Plaintiffs’ allegations.”
Douglas Vogt insists:
I have irrefutably proven that the Certificate of Live Birth that President Obama presented to the world on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulently created document put together using the Adobe Photoshop or Illustrator programs and the creation of this forgery of a public document constitutes a class B felony in Hawaii and multiple violations under U.S. Code section Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 47,Sec.1028, and therefore an impeachable offense. When this comes to the public’s attention, it will be the greatest scandal in the country’s history–”nothing comes even close. This will surpass the all previous scandals including the Watergate scandal of the Nixon administration.
Compare this to the findings that a Xerox 7655 Workcentre creates a document with exactly the same artifacts.
Instead, Mike Zullo will be filling the empty time.
Another hilarious non-show…
Exciting new developments.
Kessler has dropped support for Zullo and has fully embraced Orly.
Kessler reported that he was contacted by Sharon (likely Sharon Rondeau)
Apparently, Zullo had a “shit fit” over Kessler’s interview with Orly.
It’s so funny to see the two sides rip each other apart.
‘Chief’ Kessler, a one man police force, has his shows on blogtalkradio
On June 18, 2013, the Court issued a brief Minute Order declining to sanction Defendant Orly Taitz (“Taitz”) on very narrow grounds. (Dkt. No. 632.) The Court now expands briefly on that Minute Order to say that another court did award sanctions against Taitz, but they were discovery sanctions that were less severe than other sanctions. This Court therefore decided not to sanction Taitz for misrepresentations about sanctions against her, hoping that the parties would better focus on the substantive issues in this litigation. There was no finding by this Court that Taitz never lied.
Okay, who has pranked our dentist/lawyer friend? Orly believes that since Obama et al refused to respond to her appeal, they are now in default… Poor Orly… Or course, new information cannot be raised on appeal and yet.. Hey wait, did she not lecture Zullo on this? Orly is so clueless… Soooo funny… And really, some third hand hearsay…
IN THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Superior Court Ca5e Number
Taitz v Obama, Feinstein, Emken
NOTICE BY APPELLANT OF APPELLEES FAILURE TO FILE APPELLEES BRIEF.
NEW INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN, IMPORTANT FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF THE CASE,
Zebest and Irey have tried to argue that the halos around the text are caused by a unsharp filter. However, there is a real problem with this: The halo is in the background, while the text is in the foreground, the unsharp filter works on the text layer only, unless the layers are somehow merged down but then the layers disappear.
Remember how Mara Zebest used to show how she ‘created’ a halo around the letters, but on closer scrutiny, the halo shows differences from the halo observed.
Orly is explaining that she is filing a motion for reconsideration under the FRCP 60(b)(2) rule, which has a time limit of one year after the case has been decided. Orly is clearly too late.
At the time the case was originally filed and heard, the plaintiffs did not have new information that became available recently. Such information includes recently released census data which shows Harrison J. Bounel being born in 1890, recent disclosure to the public of the 120 year SSA rule, which requires release of SS-5, Social Security original application of “extremely aged individuals”, meaning individuals of 120 years old or older without a consent of such individual and without a death certificate or any other proof of death, as well as recent report from Merlins Information Systems showing Barack Obama using both Bounel’s name and Social Security number in connection to his property at 5046 Greenwood in Chicago as late as 2009.
AnitaMarie at the Fogbow announced
Doc C just posted Taitz’s Opening Brief. His summary: It’s crap.
He’s being very kind.
Appellants’ Opening Brief
I cannot believe the horrible brief. It starts off with a reference to 28 USC § 1295 Jurisdiction of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Remember, she is filing with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Let me explain, the US Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit
[...] is a United States court of appeals headquartered in Washington, D.C.. The court was created by Congress with passage of the Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1982, which merged the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and the appellate division of the United States Court of Claims, making the judges of the former courts into circuit judges.
The correct reference is of course 28 USC § 1291 Final decisions of district courts. How could a lawyer make such a fundamental error?… Well, remember, this is Orly..
Some people at ORYR are still clueless about the legal status of posse members.
Brian Reilly, former Cold Case Posse member reports
Yes, Zullo is a volunteer. He is conbsidered “law enforcement support.” Posse members who show their badges inappropriately can be charged with impersonating a police officer. The investigation began at the direction of the Sheriff to look into the authenticity of the BC as it related to AZ criminal statutes. On March 1, 2012, the MCSO announced that PC existed that crimes had been committed. However, recently they are saying that the Sheriff never promised to file a criminal complaint, with a switch to focusing on taking the documentation to Congress. In the past 21 months, the entire Congress has not been formally approached by the MCSO CCP.
Orly, undeterred by her failures, is now attempting to refile her foolish claims, which are precluded under FRCP 60(b)(2)..(3) as they are filed outside the one year statutory limit.
Orly: Please, check the third time. I made a couple of corrections noticed by readers. I want to make sure this is docketed asap. We need to remove the criminal out of the White House ASAP and send him to prison ASAP for using a stolen social Security number and forged IDs. See, if you notice any other areas that need redaction. thank you
There is of course no evidence that our President is using a stolen SSN and other than a spurious mention of the SSN also belonging to a Harrison J Bounel, there is no evidence that the SSN was assigned to Bounel. In fact, the FOIA response observed that the SSN belonged to a living person, thus destroying Orly’s foolish hopes that she has somehow ‘proven’ that the SSN belongs to someone who lived more than 120 years ago.
So, not only will Orly fail because of having filed too late, but also because she lacks any foundation for her claims. And that appears to be, par for the course, as several courts have tried to educate her on the meaning of evidence…
Poor Orly, so unable to present any legally admissible and relevant evidence, in addition to be unable to follow the Court’s simple but binding rules.
Like Zullo, she seems to be quite able to impeach her own cases… Why she does not file another FOIA, providing the relevant ‘new evidence’ and see how the agency responds? Then she can attempt to file another lawsuit, which of course will fail… But the present path provides no relief from the statutory deadlines.
And the birther wars continue. Why Zullo feels the need to bring down Orly, who is after all, fighting on his side, is quite amusing. Of course, Orly has explained why Zullo’s affidavit has no relevance in the Alabama case, so Zullo has to show that he is not the only one confused about the presentation of evidence in a court. Similarly, with the highly compressed PDF document, there is no evidence of a crime either, other than some minor artifacts which can be quite easily explained by compression workflow.
The posters at ORYR are over each other, attacking or defending Orly.. Hilarious… And they accusations are sooo ironic… So what is to be gained from tearing down Orly I wonder. And why is the non-profit suddenly so intent on dropping the pretense that a criminal complaint was necessary and are now pursuing civil avenues, precluded by rules of the court, and trying to convince Congress? I have no doubt that if Congress gets involved, the tea party will end up embarrassing the Republican party and be responsible for a mid term landslide. And I still do not understand why the artifacts in a highly compressed PDF copy are somehow relevant as the DOH has verified and certified all the information. And we also have the higher resolution B&W AP scan as well as the Savannah Guthrie, which were taken of the original document.
From the audio:
Zullo on Taitz: “This is really mind boggling … this woman professes to be an attorney” “…Apparently she doesn’t understand what jurisdiction means” “Banging the drum to get a complaint filed which is something Orly Taitz continues to do, I am sorry that she’s so entrenched in this…I know she’s had 20 some odd court cases on this very issue, and maybe now she’s feeling very threatened…” “There is no crime here. And if you took Orly Taitz’ information — what she’s presented in courtrooms –and you went to a county prosecutor… he will not do anything with that information. Because that’s all it is — is information. There’s no evidence of a crime.”
One can bring a 60B motion for reconsideration any time he gets new information. For example, suddenly one finds a DNA of a person who committed a crime, when a new witness comes forward. For this reason there is a 60 B motion.
This is what the relevant part of Rule 60 says:
Rule 60 (b) Grounds for Relief from a Final Judgment, Order, or Proceeding. On motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:
(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
(2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
(3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party;
(4) the judgment is void;
(5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or
(6) any other reason that justifies relief.
(c) Timing and Effect of the Motion.
(1) Timing. A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time—and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) no more than a year after the entry of the judgment or order or the date of the proceeding.
(2) Effect on Finality. The motion does not affect the judgment’s finality or suspend its operation.
It’s this level of inability to properly read a rule that has caused Orly so much misery… There are simple rules and essential for any civil lawsuit in Federal Court and Orly still does not seem to understand them. And she is surprised when the judge rejects her arguments and motions…