About

My position is straightforward

1. If, as the COLB and the statements of the Department of Health of Hawaii show, President Obama was born on US soil then he is a natural born citizen

2. If he were born abroad, he would likely not be a natural born citizen since such children become citizens by statute, not through common law

3. If Obama acquired an Indonesian citizenship then he still would not have lost his natural born citizenship status

I find arguments based on dual citizenship status to be significantly flawed, and believe that the only way for the President to be ineligible is if he were born outside the United States.

While there is overwhelming data supporting his birth on US soil, there are a few contradictory statements made by people who were not present at his birth but who have come to the conclusion that President Obama is a Kenyan, is of Kenyan Blood, or considers Kenya to be his ‘home country’. None of these instances really are relevant until it can be shown conclusively that President Obama was born on Kenyan soil. This requires that a Kenyan birth certificate is found which is duly attested to by Kenyan officials according to the Federal Rules of Evidence.

While I personally have accepted the facts that show President Obama born on US soil, I also understand why some may doubt this. For this, I personally would have hoped that President Obama would once again release his Certification of Live Birth for inspection. However, I can also accept that other considerations may preclude the President from taking such a precedent setting step.

I also accept the fact that those who doubt Obama’s eligibility may attempt to raise the issue with Congress, the Courts as well as State Governments. Ideally, these attempts would combine with other efforts to improve the tractability of our votes, by for instance proposing a federal standard for voting devices that would guarantee that votes are counted, counted correctly and that votes can be tracked and recounted independently from the devices used.

I also believe that those people who strongly believe in State Rights, accept that the State of Hawaii may determine what documents are to be presented to be used in determining the location and time of birth of one of its state citizens. As such, I find bills which attempt to specify what is acceptable to other states to be foolish and in violation of the Full Faith and Credit clause of our Constitution. Anyone in support of State Rights should understand the internal contradiction in these bills.

And finally, I am fully open to the possibility that I am totally wrong in my position.

32 thoughts on “About

  1. Wow; I understand you wanting to stop the updates, but I wish you could have left the content intact. As more people become aware of the whole fiasco, this site could be a great record of all of the cases.

    Regardless, thank you for all of your work!

  2. I will likely work with Dr C on a wiki which will retain a lot of the postings in a more browsable format.

  3. Read Guthrie v. United States at jedipauly.com The flaw in your foundation is number one in your reasoning. Yes, if Obama was born in Hawaii which I am assuming that he was, then he is a natural born citizen all right, a natual born citizen of Kenya and not a natural born Citizen of the United States. Reliance upon territorial jurisdiction for one’s citizenship is no different than relying upon statutory authority. The place of birth has no bearing whatsoever on natural born status. The Title of Nobility prohibitions in the Constitution prevent using territory (soil) as an avenue for natural born Citizenship in order to prevent the establishment of a Monarchy form of government. Now you know the truth. The other natural born Citizens of the U.S. and I would very much appreciate it, if you would amend your site to reflect the truth and stop generating hate and emnity towards me and other natural born Citizens.

    Thank You for your cooperation.

    Paul Guthrie

  4. Read Guthrie v. United States at jedipauly.com The flaw in your foundation is number one in your reasoning. Yes, if Obama was born in Hawaii which I am assuming that he was, then he is a natural born citizen all right, a natual born citizen of Kenya and not a natural born Citizen of the United States. Reliance upon territorial jurisdiction for one’s citizenship is no different than relying upon statutory authority. The place of birth has no bearing whatsoever on natural born status. The Title of Nobility prohibitions in the Constitution prevent using territory (soil) as an avenue for natural born Citizenship in order to prevent the establishment of a Monarchy form of government. Now you know the truth. The other natural born Citizens of the U.S. and I would very much appreciate it, if you would amend your site to reflect the truth and stop generating hate and emnity towards me and other natural born Citizens.

    Thank You for your cooperation.

    Paul Guthrie

  5. Why release the COLB for inspection? The info is what matters and that has been verified by Hawaii, many times. The same amount of verification for Obama as has been done for all his predecessors in office – that is all we now need.

    If people still can’t get over a rational coherent man in the White House, then more fool them. If they still can’t get over him being black, well I have no sympathy.

    enough with this pandering (in anyway) to the birther.

  6. Why release the COLB for inspection? The info is what matters and that has been verified by Hawaii, many times. The same amount of verification for Obama as has been done for all his predecessors in office – that is all we now need.

    If people still can’t get over a rational coherent man in the White House, then more fool them. If they still can’t get over him being black, well I have no sympathy.

    enough with this pandering (in anyway) to the birther.

  7. Hi NBC,

    Thought you might enjoy this.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=8340AQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+Digest+of+Select+British+Statutes:+Comprising+Those&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Y0FOUYDGF-SQiALs9YHwBw&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg

    Over a Mario’s they have found an 1817 legal text – “A Digest of Select British Statutes:”

    By Samuel Roberts a judge of the Pennsylvania Courts.

    Page 26 – “The children of aliens, born within the United States are aliens: they do not acquire citizenship by birth; but remain in the condition of the parents.”

    The footnote for this section reads: “In this particular our laws differ from the English laws; but are more consistent with reason and the laws of nature.”

  8. Hi NBC,

    Thought you might enjoy this.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=8340AQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=A+Digest+of+Select+British+Statutes:+Comprising+Those&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Y0FOUYDGF-SQiALs9YHwBw&ved=0CDsQ6AEwAg

    Over a Mario’s they have found an 1817 legal text – “A Digest of Select British Statutes:”

    By Samuel Roberts a judge of the Pennsylvania Courts.

    Page 26 – “The children of aliens, born within the United States are aliens: they do not acquire citizenship by birth; but remain in the condition of the parents.”

    The footnote for this section reads: “In this particular our laws differ from the English laws; but are more consistent with reason and the laws of nature.”

  9. your site offered a wealth of information – you and it are greatly missed – thanks for all you have done – it’s unfortunate that the content of this site is not available for the record and history

  10. your site offered a wealth of information – you and it are greatly missed – thanks for all you have done – it’s unfortunate that the content of this site is not available for the record and history

  11. Mark Gillar has an interview with Mike Zullo. They seem to be convinced that the clipping mask that surrounds the pdf and covers the edge of the green security background is proof of forgery. They also are pooping Professor de Queiroz’s statements.

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2013/04/17/obama-eligbility-probe-prepares-to-enter-next-phase

    At the 40:00 Mark Gillar says ““The construction of these layers is highly inconsistent with adaptive compression or mixed raster compression.”

    At 40;20, “Can you have more than one 1-bit layer with MRC and that person will say well yes. But then the follow-up question should be well if those layers have color is there a corresponding 8-bit layer for each 1-bit layer? And the answer would be yes, you would have to have a corresponding 8-bit layer.”

    At 41:10, “Another example of that is the thing with the clipping mask, someone pointed out the clipping mask hides information and that can’t be.”

    It soundss like they are struggling to explain why real experts say there is nothing wrong with the pdf.

  12. Mark Gillar has an interview with Mike Zullo. They seem to be convinced that the clipping mask that surrounds the pdf and covers the edge of the green security background is proof of forgery. They also are pooping Professor de Queiroz’s statements.

    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar/2013/04/17/obama-eligbility-probe-prepares-to-enter-next-phase

    At the 40:00 Mark Gillar says ““The construction of these layers is highly inconsistent with adaptive compression or mixed raster compression.”

    At 40;20, “Can you have more than one 1-bit layer with MRC and that person will say well yes. But then the follow-up question should be well if those layers have color is there a corresponding 8-bit layer for each 1-bit layer? And the answer would be yes, you would have to have a corresponding 8-bit layer.”

    At 41:10, “Another example of that is the thing with the clipping mask, someone pointed out the clipping mask hides information and that can’t be.”

    It soundss like they are struggling to explain why real experts say there is nothing wrong with the pdf.

  13. Meanwhile back in Vermont – Mario is reporting:

    I did not attend the H. Brooke Paige Barack Obama eligibility hearing today in the Vermont Supreme Court.

    I do know that the hearing went well. The Justices gave Mr. Paige’s case the respect that it deserves. Mr. Paige did an excellent job presenting the arguments. Apart from the procedural and justiciable issues, he was able to present his argument on the meaning that the Founders and Framers gave to the “natural born Citizen” clause.

    We are now waiting for a decision.

    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?postID=2111932174402297120&blogID=7466841558189356289&isPopup=false&page=2

  14. Meanwhile back in Vermont – Mario is reporting:

    I did not attend the H. Brooke Paige Barack Obama eligibility hearing today in the Vermont Supreme Court.

    I do know that the hearing went well. The Justices gave Mr. Paige’s case the respect that it deserves. Mr. Paige did an excellent job presenting the arguments. Apart from the procedural and justiciable issues, he was able to present his argument on the meaning that the Founders and Framers gave to the “natural born Citizen” clause.

    We are now waiting for a decision.

    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?postID=2111932174402297120&blogID=7466841558189356289&isPopup=false&page=2

  15. I’m hoping for a state Supreme Court opinion that rejects Mario’s theories. That will be fun.

  16. I’m hoping for a state Supreme Court opinion that rejects Mario’s theories. That will be fun.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s