FL – Voeltz v Obama – Notice of Title 3 USC 5
December 12, 2012
As expected, the safe harbor kicked in…
12/12/2012 PRESIDENT OBAMAS NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY OF TITLE 3 U.S.C. 5
8 Comments
Comments are closed.
Where native and natural coincide
Recent Comments
- alg on AL – McInnish v Chapman – George Miller
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- per son on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- per son on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- NBC on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- gorefan on AL – McInnish v Chapman – SCOA – (In)admissible hearsay
- gorefan on Birther Scorecard
- NBC on the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse – County Attorney Montgomery
- NBC on Exploring the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse
- NBC on Exploring the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Cold Case Posse
Too Busy
Blog Stats
- 1,251,070 visits
Categories
Myths Debunked
- Natural Born
- Dual Citizenship
- Indonesian Adoption
- Indonesian Citizenship
- Indonesian Passport
- Loss of Citizenship
- Multiple SSN
- Obama SSN Fraud
- Pakistan
- Subject to the jurisdiction thereof
- US v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)
- About
- Blog Rules
- Birther Scorecard
- Precedent Cases
- Foreign Birth
- Natural Born Quotes
- State Election Challenges
- Pending Challenges
- Shanks v Dupont
- The Apuzzo Files
Obama ConspiracyBlogroll
- Bad Fiction
- Birther Headlines
- Docket (at ObamaConspiracy)
- Natural Born Citizenship compendium of cases and legal scholarship on meaning of “natural born citizenship” – in light of claims that a native-born US citizen who has “dual citizenship” at birth does not qualify as a “natural born” citizen under Article II.
- Obama Conspiracy
Meta
Theme: Vigilance by The Theme Foundry.
Question – why did the President’s lawyers answer the compliant on December 10th if the clock was going to run out on the 11th? Was there an accelerated timeline for them to answer? Or were they trying to lockin the ability to seek legal fees?
Ah… Perhaps they were not aware of the safe harbor but our musings alerted them to it
Let me look into the deadlines involved here…
Hmm case was filed November 29… Perhaps they liked the 12/12/12 filing date
Twice the 6/6/6
It was filed under Florida Statute 102.168 Contest of election.
which states
(6) A copy of the complaint shall be served upon the defendant and any other person named therein in the same manner as in other civil cases under the laws of this state. Within 10 days after the complaint has been served, the defendant must file an answer admitting or denying the allegations on which the contestant relies or stating that the defendant has no knowledge or information concerning the allegations, which shall be deemed a denial of the allegations, and must state any other defenses, in law or fact, on which the defendant relies. If an answer is not filed within the time prescribed, the defendant may not be granted a hearing in court to assert any claim or objection that is required by this subsection to be stated in an answer.
Thanks.
My pleasure. Just second guessing here but it seems to make sense.
Buh bye Mikey Voeltz.
So sad….