Skip to content

NY – Strunk v Electors – SCONY

December 8, 2012

Dr Conspiracy has a good article on yet another Strunk filing. In true Strunk fashion the complaint is full of incomprehensible assertions, and irrelevant references to Jesuits. Prepare for a dismissal… Those poor clerks and justices…

 

About these ads
from → NY - Strunk v NY Electoral Voters, Post Election Challenge
2 Comments
  1. Reality Check permalink
    December 9, 2012 15:47

    Ricky left an good comment on this case at Doc C’s blog:

    Rickey December 9, 2012 at 12:50 am (Quote) #

    Strunk has filed a Note of Issue, which in New York is a certification that the case is ready for trial. In fact, the defendants haven’t even filed Answers yet. The court docket indicates that the action was filed on November 14. Strunk claims that service was completed on November 30. In New York defendants have 30 days after being served in which to file their Answers, so even if proper service has been accomplished the Answers are not due until the end of December. Strunk also claims that the defendants have waived their right to have him file a Bill of Particulars, which is impossible since they haven’t even entered appearances yet.

    Strunks filed an Order to Show Cause on November 19, which Judge Schmidt refused to sign. Apart from that, there are no future appearances scheduled yet.

    The docket shows that the Court has not accepted Strunk’s Notice of Issue, which is entirely proper because it is very premature.

  2. Reality Check permalink
    December 9, 2012 15:48

    Sorry, I used the wrong block quote code there didn’t I?

    NBC: Fixed it.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: