IN – Orly v Obama – Empty seat wins again
In the Matter of the Challenge to Barack Obama, Candidate for the Democratic Party nomination for President of the United States:
Cause 2012-161, challenger Franklin D. Weyl
Cause 2012-162, challenger Edward R. Kesler
Cause 2012-163, challenger Valeria I. Ripley
Cause 2012-176, challenger Karl Swihart
Denied by 4-0…
Some tweets:
Sarah Riordan, D, calls documents submitted by Taitz “totally ridiculous” and nothing appropriate for IEC. Says not worth public time.
Tony Long, D, asks them to cite law that makes candidacy on our ballot dependent on Soc Sec number. (Taitz et al contest prez’s SSN.)
Interesting…
analogy test:
attorney Orly: empty chair
a. Titanic: iceberg
b. raw meat: meat grinder
c. snowball: hell
d. paper: shredder
e. All of the above
I listened to Orly… Hilarious… She admits to accessing the Selective Services Records and the e-Verify.. But there is nothing that shows any relevance to the eligibility of President Obama.
Accusing the Commission of being biased and involved in covering up… She is totally unable to argue a legal case, and once again we hear her voice go higher and higher but she still has no learned what it means to present legally admissible evidence and the burden of proof….
Fascinating…
During the 5 minute break we can hear the plaintiffs be even more clueless.
One of the committee members: You as an attorney (talking to Taitz) should know that you do not get to certify legal court documents… ROTFL… They submitted all the testimony from the GA hearing, but it was found to be irrelevant and inadmissible. Why did Orly not fly in her witnesses? Why did Orly not object with references to legal rules of evidence? She appeared totally unprepared to argue her case legally.
At least the Committee gave the advice to get legal representation in Illinois and have him submit a real legal challenge… ROTFL…
Wow! This is one totally corrupt board; corrupt to the bone. This election board is worse than New Hampshire. Absolutely Biased! No one is willing to listen to anything. This board make the New Hampshire board look like saints.
No argument is necessary. Anyone with a brain can tell just by listening to the audio that the commission was completely biased towards Obama and had their mind made before any word was ever spoken. Orly put forward her case, the commission essentially IGNORED is citing no valid or legal reason to do so. This was an absolute display of corrupt and bias and these board members are lower than dirt.
Quite the hearing….very amusing. Thanks for providing the link.
When the birthers finally jail or deport all the “corrupt” people, courts, and politicians, they will be left with a nation of about 50-75 people.
WAIT- maybe the birthers are in the wrong, and not the other 300 million???
Oh, poor cluess John… Let’s see if you can grasp the situation this way:
Suppose it was a Republican candidate being challenged, and some Left-Wing agitator showed up with irrelevant information, hearsay, unqualified witness statements, and uncertified documents… Wouldn’t you want the challenge dismissed?
And what credibility would you give any claim by Liberals that the Board was biased in favor of the Republican?
I choose e because like the mighty empty chair, the iceberg remains stationary, has no moving parts, and still manages to hit its target.
I’d like to also propose a sixth choice:
f. butter: chainsaw