Arpaio’s big surprise
Arpaio said he took on the “investigation” into Obama’s eligibility to be president because he was “doing him a favor” by intending to clear his name.
That will be a shock to the tea party birthers… ROTFL… Be prepared for a non-event.
2 Responses to “Arpaio’s big surprise”
Powerful – Change
State Election Challenges
Recent Comments
- NBC on Noonan not Happy
- donna on Noonan not Happy
- NBC on US v Wong Kim Ark – Brief on Behalf of the Appellant (Government)
- Alcum on US v Wong Kim Ark – Brief on Behalf of the Appellant (Government)
- NBC on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- donna on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- realist on Taitz v Ruemmler – Appeal – Summary Affirmance Granted
- NBC on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- donna on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- Northland10 on AZ – SOS Bennett – The Verification
- NBC on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- donna on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- NBC on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- Reality Check on CA – Noonan v Obama – Barnett Blows It…
- J. Potter on ‘Toughest’ Sheriff avoids getting ‘leid’
Too Busy

Blog Stats
- 1,102,270 visits
Categories
Myths Debunked
- Natural Born
- Dual Citizenship
- Indonesian Adoption
- Indonesian Citizenship
- Indonesian Passport
- Loss of Citizenship
- Multiple SSN
- Obama SSN Fraud
- Pakistan
- Subject to the jurisdiction thereof
- US v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)
- A lesson learned? Plaintiff in Affordable Care Act files for medical bankruptcy
- AZ Governor not taking Arpaio too seriously
Blogroll
Court Cases - Appeals
Court Cases - Appeals Dismissed
Court Cases - Dismissed
- Ankeny v Governor of Indiana
- Berg v Obama
- Berg v Obama (Qui Tam)
- Brockhausen v Andrade
- Broe v Reed
- Cohen v Obama
- Cook v Good
- Craig v US
- Greenberg v Brunner
- Hunter v Obama
- Jones v Obama
- Kelso v Obama
- Kerchner v Obama
- Keyes v Lingle
- Keyes v Obama
- Lightfoot v Bowen
- Orly v Obama
- Purpura v Sebelius
- Re: Super American Grand Jury
- Rhodes v Gates
- Rhodes v McDonald
- Schneller v Cortes
- Strunk v XXX
- Sullivan v Marshall
- Thomas v Hosemann
- Wrotnowski v Bysiewicz
Arpaio’s “cold case posse” only has two actual options. There is no doubt the President was born in Hawaii. So they can either acknowledge he is a natural born citizen, or they can pretend that the “two citizen parents” definition of “natural born citizen” is correct. Wouldn’t it be lovely if on March 1st his report concedes reality? Then we can enjoy the explosion of bitterness and anger at Arpaio on Free Republic as they accuse him of being “paid off” or “threatened”. Sweet birfer tears of despair.
Have you noticed how many birthers move from one ‘this one is it’ moment to another, forgetting the history of their previous failures. I find it fascinating…