Orly Debunked – Claim 16 Sandra Lines – Keyes/Barnett November 12, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.trackback
16.The court erred in not including in the order and not considering an affidavit of Sandra Ramsey Lines, submitted by the plaintiffs as part of the attachment in Dossier #1 and Dossier #6, as Ms Lines, one of the most renown forensic document expert stated in her affidavit that Mr. Obama’s short form Certification of Live Birth cannot be considered genuine without analyzing the original currently sealed in the Health Department in Hawaii. Court also erred in omitting from the final order affidavits of licensed investigators Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels. Court erred in refusing to lift the stay of discovery and granting a motion to dismiss, whereby the court de facto aided and abetted obstruction of Justice by Mr. Obama
Again Orly fails to follow the Local Rules for filing a motion for reconsideration. But the dossier is of no relevance to the ruling which is based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In other words, Orly once again argues the merits while the dismissal was based on the lack of jurisdiction. Worse, she is accusing the Court of aiding and abetting Obstruction of Justice. That’s a serious claim, and deserves a matching response.
Comments
Sorry comments are closed for this entry
Hear the whistling wind through the trees??? That’s the sound of the smack down that’s coming…
It is a serious claim indeed…one that will most likely have an epic answer.