Orly Taitz – Continued Confusion about UCMJ Article 138 July 4, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Myths, UCMJ Article 138, Uncategorized.trackback
Todd Salzer:
BHO has visited both theaters and met with with the military commanders in private meetings in both theaters. Any order issued by the CINC, even a confirmation of previous orders, such as redeployment, that affects any Article 138 complainant would subject BHO to the UCMJ under their complaint.
Article 138 is used against one’s Commanding Officer and President Obama, other than perhaps for some of the top brass, is not a Commanding Officer. In fact, the term is well defined.
Todd continues
It took over 2 months to respond to you. These men are very well trained and experienced in exploiting weaknesses and not exposing their own. They have the duty to uphold and defend the Constitution and the authority under the UCMJ to act and they do not. There is no indication in Captain Crawford’s reply that the Chairman, who is also the C.O. of the Office of General Counsel, has issued any order to that office. He merely sent the dossiers for review. He did not tell them to contact you, he did not direct them to contact the Attorney General, he did not tell them to prepare a warrant for the arrest of BHO.
Note: Since they are following the rules and procedures, any argument that they are not defending and upholding the Constitution seems somewhat premature.
These men have a sworn duty to uphold and defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, which is supposed to trump the UCMJ. If it no longer does in the eyes of the Joint Chief’s and their legal counsel then it is time for us to dig in! If the Attorney General will not act, the Congress will not act, and the Courts will not act it is incumbent upon the military to act! It appears that they too, are betraying their oaths. I am ashamed that such cowards and traitors are among the ranks of our Armed Forces! THEY should be the chief complainants in the court actions that you and others have filed. There should be no higher priority to them then to establish that the CINC is legitimate and the Constitution, and therefore the republic, is intact. Anything else IS cowardice and treachery.
Note: Not by any legal or Constitutional definition. In fact, the proper authority to establish eligibility is Congress per the 20th Amendment. To call them cowards and traitors presumes that President Obama has shown to be ineligible and no such evidence exists. At best there appear to be some spurious ‘arguments’ which attempt to establish that President Obama is not eligible but that’s irrelevant at this moment as these cases, per Constitution, will not be heard in Court.
There is no other conclusion,Counselor, then that the delay in responding to you and the passing to the Office of General Counsel “for review” is just more subterfuge, complicity, and treason.
Note: I can understand why Todd would hold these beliefs, even though they have little relevance in facts.
