Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored (Re-opened for limited business)

Note that the following was reported by Orly Taitz and could not be independently verified.

I have resubmitted Easterling et al v Obama et al in the form of Motion for Leave of Court to submit under the original jurisdiction. I called the Supreme Court and was told that the clerk for original jurisdiction is Cynthia Rapp 202-479-3000 extention 3014.

I inquired about the case and she said: “don’t bother submitting, it will be denied, it is only for disputes between the states”. I stated to her that article 3 of the Constitution allows Original jurisdiction of the Supreme court for cases involving ambassadors and and ministers as well. She asked if I am an ambassador and I told her that I am not and I don’t have to be. Constitution does not specify that the ambassadors have to be plaintiffs, which means that they can be defendants. Her response was -listen to me, it will be denied. I protested by saying that it is not up to the clerks to decide, it is up to the justices of the Supreme Court to decide whether they will exercise their right to hear the cases under original non-exclusive jurisdiction or not. It is really not up to the clerks.  She needs to docket the case and forward it to the justices. She responded by saying: “It is up to us, we do the screening”. I responded, that they can do the screening of technical errors, not decision on the merits of the case. Even with technical errors there were precedents from different Federal courts, that if the case mostly complies, the clerk has to docket it with the notation of the error, to be addressed and corrected by the attorney of record. At that point she asked me if I am an attorney. I told her, yes I am, what about you? She said “OK, submit it”.

Note: Cynthia Rapp is correct that the clerks get to decide whether or not submissions to the Court follow established procedures and in case of Original Jurisdiction, the Supreme Court only has exclusive Original Jurisdiction is cases between two States. In cases involving ambassadors, Consuls etc, the Supreme Court does not have exclusive Jurisdiction especially since the legislative Branch has granted exclusive Jurisdiction in these cases to the District Court. It is even less clear that a case which only indirectly involves Ambassadors falls under Original Jurisdiction but assuming that it does, the combination Quo Warranto and Cases involving Consuls would mean that the District Court of DC remains the only viable option. In order to qualify for Quo Warranto, the plaintiffs have to petition the Attorney General of DC or the United States to file such a case with the DC Courts.

I was really upset after this conversation, it seems there is a detachment between the judges and the public there is this Chinese wall of gate keepers. Same problem with the elected officials and their liberal pro-Obama younger aids, serving as gate keepers.

As I was relating this conversation to my husband, he said “Write her name  down and report her”. It got me thinking, where do I report her? Who do I report her to? I’ve already made an effort in going all the way to Moscow Idaho to report to Chief Justice Roberts about my case being erased from the docket by somebody one day after the inauguration. He had a duty to the whole nation to announce an investigation into this scandal, and so far there was nothing from chief Justice Roberts.

There is a wall of silence and fear and apathy coming from every level of the government. It provides such a  resembles to what I have seen in the communist Soviet Union.

Our sold out puppet main stream media is silent. I remember how in the SovietUnion my parents and their friends were huddled around transistor radios, trying to get any info, any glimpse of truth, any real news   from BBC or Radio Free Europe . With their broken English, they could catch only every other word, but it was better then the Communist brainwashing. That was the reason, why they sent me for testing, to get into a special school with advanced academics, advanced English and math and science, so one day I would be able to escape this dreaded existence or at least, so I will have the  the tools to fight for my rights.

Never in my life did I think that I will have to fight for my rights on American soil, it is such a dejavu, such a recurrent nightmare.

Note: Orly fails to establish what rights she is fighting for. She has a right to file lawsuits, but she does not have the right to standing, or to be heard. She has the right to Petition the Government, but that does not translate into a right to be heard. She has the right of freedom of speech, as long as it meets the Constitutional guidelines.

United States of America   was a shining city on the hill, was a beacon of hope. Together with the Western Europe it was a hope for the rest of the world. If this country falls into the grasp of totalitarianism, the whole planet will succumb  to the dark middle ages of lack of freedoms, lack of liberties, lack of freedom of speech, lack of right to resolve grievances, lack of free press and free Judiciary.

Please, don’t let it happen. Please stand the course. Please call all of the elected oficials, all of law enforcement, and let them know that they have to be true to their oath to uphold the constitution or they will be guilty of treason together with Obama and his cronies.

Note: Orly seems to suggest that Obama has already been found ineligible, which of course is far from the truth. In fact, under US law, the President remains the de facto and de jure President and if he is consequently found ineligible, there can be no guilt of treason for actions taken up to that moment. In fact, according to US law, any actions by a de facto officer remain valid and enforcable.

Please, make signs “Obama is a foreign National from Birth till now” “Obama is a citizen of Kenya and Indonesia, cannot be the US president.” Please, gather a group of patrioits and bring  lounge chairs and sit in  front  of the White House, department of Justice, department of Home land Security, major news outlets, governors mentions and Federal buildings, please recruit more people during the 4th of July parties.  We can take the country back: one person at a time, one sign at a time, one demonstration at a time, one eligibility law suit at a time.

And all eligibility lawsuits seem to follow its predecessors into ‘denied’ or ‘rejected’. With every precedent, the likelihood of another suit succeeding becomes less and less. The lack of success becomes a ball of chains to such cases. Of course, the People are free to petition the government, change the government but they lack standing to challenge the eligibility of a duly elected President.