Does Obama believe that the Constitution is wrong? May 28, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Obama Presidency.comments closed
The real problem that needs to be addressed another eligibility problem THAT CAN BE PROVEN. On Record, Obama has stated the Constitution is flawed, the founding fathers were flawed and merely a set of “negative liberties”. Thru his campaign, Obama preached about social injustice/the need for wealth redistribution and has thus far proven he is still of the same mind set that the US Constitution is inherently wrong. Therefore, Mr. Soetoro/Obama could not legally even take the oath of office since he cannot PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND, the US Constitution that he believes is WRONG.
Let’s place the claims into their proper perspectives
CLAIM; On Record, Obama has stated the Constitution is flawed, the founding fathers were flawed and merely a set of “negative liberties”.
Lisa Liberi v Orly Taitz – Request for Entry of Default Judgment May 28, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Lawyers, Orly Taitz, Philip Berg.comments closed
Some fascinating developments in the case Liberi v Taitz, filed by Philip Berg on May 4, 2009. Orly and the defendents had until May 26 to enter their pleadings. It seems, from Orly’s timeline, that she ‘FedEx’ed her ‘pleadings’ to Berg and a 3rd party who would have have to file the pleadings with the Court.
It seems however, that he pleadings failed to make it into the Court Electronic Filing System. Not surprisingly, Berg has filed a motion for Entry of Default Judgment.
4. Defendants’ Answers were due on the Complaint May 26, 2009.
5. Defendants’ have failed to appear, plead or otherwise defend within the time allowed and therefore, are now in default.
6. Plaintiffs have sued for a sum certain as outlined in the Complaint.
7. Plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court enter Default in favor of Plaintiffs, Lisa Liberi, The Law Offices of Philip J. Berg, Evelyn Adams a/k/a Momma E, Lisa Ostella and Go Excel Global and against the Defendants’, Orly Taitz a/k/a Dr. Orly Taitz a/k/a Law Offices of Orly Taitz a/k/a www.orlytaitzesq.com a/k/a www.repubx.com a/k/a Orly Taitz, Inc.
I believe the lawsuit was for several hundreds of millions of dollars.
Ooops
The Docket shows that the Clerk has entered a ‘default entry’ for Orly Taitz and the Sankey firm (private investigator used by Orly). We shall see how this develops.
Date Filed # Docket Text
05/27/2009 Default Entered (gn, ) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
05/27/2009 DEFAULT BY ORLY TAITZ, DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATIONS, INC., THE SANKEY FIRM FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR, PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND. (gn, ) (Entered: 05/28/2009)
Orly seems to believe that she did not have access to the electronic court filing (ECF) system, the Court’s rules for attorneys who do not want to, or are unable to file via ECF are clear
“Any attorney that has been excused from registering as an ECF Filing User in accordance with Local Civil Rule 5.1.2 is required to file the document on a disk in PDF format with a courtesy copy and a signature form on file. The document submitted on disk constitutes the original. Attorneys are required to submit a signature form (one-time only). After the signature form is submitted a signature code is provided by the Clerk’s Office. The filing attorney is to place the signature code on the signature line of the courtesy copy. Copies of documents served on counsel are to contain the signature of the filing attorney and not the code.”
Keyes v Obama – Doc 6 – MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION May 27, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Keyes v Obama, Keyes v Obama (Docs), Lawyers, Legal Cases, Orly Taitz.comments closed
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than June 12, 2009 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:
this Court has not received a responsive pleading from, or a proof of service for, various defendants;
XXX Answers by the defendant(s) or plaintiff’s request for entry of default
___ Filing of a request for the clerk to enter default judgment OR the filing of a motion for
entry of default judgment.
Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1
NO oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon response by plaintiff(s) is due.
Keyes v Obama – Doc 5 – PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by plaintiffs upon Barack H Obama served on 2/10/2009, answer due 3/2/2009. May 18, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Keyes v Obama, Keyes v Obama (Docs), Lawyers, Legal Cases, Orly Taitz.comments closed
Proof of Service:
I served the summons on (name of individual) Mail Clerk who is designated by law to accept process on behalf of (name of organization) Department of Justice Mail Room Clerk on (Date) February 10, 2009
Keyes v Obama – Doc 4 – ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION May 12, 2009
Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Keyes v Obama, Keyes v Obama (Docs), Lawyers, Legal Cases, Orly Taitz.comments closed
Order to Show Cause for Lack of Prosecution 05/12/2009
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. SACV 09-0082-DOC(ANx)
Date May 12, 2009
Present: The Honorable DAVID O. CARTER, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter: Kristee Hopkins
Proceedings: [IN CHAMBERS]
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than May 29, 2009 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:
XXX this Court has not received a responsive pleading from, or a proof of service for,
various defendants;
Answers by the defendant(s) or plaintiff’s request for entry of default
___ Filing of a request for the clerk to enter default judgment OR the filing of a motion for
entry of default judgment.
Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.
It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to respond promptly to all orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time under Rule 55 remedies promptly upon default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1
NO oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due.
: 0
Initials of Preparer kh
