jump to navigation

News – AOL – Obama Indicted by 'Common Law Grand Jury' March 30, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Media Update, News.
comments closed

AOL Political Machine

Having totally struck out in every court of law on every case brought to date, “hundreds of thousands” of names on petitions, righteous indignation on tens of American eagle and bunting-strewn websites about the Usurper Hussein Obama/Soetero and epic fail getting anyone except fellow lunatics to pay attention, the “Birther” (or Birfer) movement thinks its may have found it’s Holy Grail to remove the scary black Muslim uncitizen from the office of POTUS.

James v Obama – Draft only? March 30, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.
comments closed

Someone pointed out to me that Orly did not file a lawsuit in DC but rather sent a draf to Taylor for him to start his own lawsuit.

Fascinating, the document is full of hilarious ‘arguments’ and I can wait for poor Taylor to have to shred the many pages, uh I mean read them.

From Orly’s Quo Warranto Cover Letter:

These Relators bring information in the nature of Quo Warranto that Barack Hussein Obama, II, is usurping the office of President, per the attached relation.
Relators request that as US Attorney, you institute a Quo Warranto proceeding against Obama under DC Code § 16-3502, and demand that Obama show clear title, proving, with clear and convincing evidence, that he had qualified as President elect.
By each Relator’s constitutional Oath of Office, and interest above other citizens and taxpayers, Relators submit that they have standing.
Relators relate this information in the form of draft motions to the United States District Court, in the District of Columbia. This includes bringing quo warranto and request for a jury trial to establish the facts.

I should have known…

Common Law Grand Jury and the Law March 30, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Common Law Grand Jury, Just Plain Weird, Legal Remedies, Uncategorized.
comments closed

One of the basic requirements for a legal Grand Jury proceeding is that the members are drawn from fair-minded, impartial, intelligent men. For this reason the names of tax payers are selected in due proportion from all parts of the state or county and are placed in a jury box. This is to guarantee that the Grand Jury is not stacked inappropriately. If the law is not followed, an incompetent grand jury results:

The grand jury does not by our law consist of twelve men congregated by the mere order of the court. It consists of twelve men selected, drawn, and impaneled according to the, requirements of the law, and if the law is not followed, it is an incompetent grand jury. Our law provides that anyone indicted by such a grand jury may question their power by a motion to set aside the indictment, and he cannot be required to answer to a charge against him unless it has been preferred according to the forms of law. The importance of securing fair-minded, impartial, intelligent men for grand jurors, who without bias or prejudice will weigh the evidence, and be governed by it alone, cannot be overestimated. To secure such grand jurors, the statute requires the names of qualified taxpayers to be selected in due proportion from all parts of the county, to be placed in the jury box. There is a sound reason for this. The petit jury panel cannot very well be packed against a defendant on trial, the defendant by his counsel may examine a petit jury panel minutely as to qualifications, bias, or prejudice, and may challenge for cause, and in addition is entitled to his peremptory challenges allowed by law, but in the case of a grand jury panel, the parties to be investigated by the grand jury rarely ever know, in advance, of their investigation, and have no opportunity to examine the grand jury panel as to bias or prejudice, or to challenge for cause or peremptorily, and this is one reason why it is not permitted, under the law, to select members of the grand jury from the body of the county, under an open venire.”

Source: Annotated Cases, American and English: Containing the Important Cases Selected from the Current American, Canadian, and English Reports Published by Edward Thompson Co., 1918
Does anyone venture to guess if the Common Law Grand Juries called together by Obama doubters passes Constitutional muster? Next time I want to indict a President, all I need is to get 12 people to agree to indict… Something just does not sound right here… Of course, how an incompetent Grand Jury envisions to enforce its indictments is another issue seldomly considered seriously. In other words, it seems that these Grand Jury proceedings are mostly for PR reasons, and given the lack of interest from the media, they are likely to fail as much as their chances of legal success.
Nevertheless, these gatherings do give the authorities the opportunity to monitor what appears to be a small but vocal and outspoken group of people who seem to be intent to remove a validly elected President at almost any cost.

Orly – James v Obama – Part 2 March 30, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Born in Kenya, Certification of Live Birth, Citizenship, Dual Citizenship, Foreign Born Out of Wedlock, Indonesian Passport, James v. Obama, Just Plain Weird, Lack of Hospital records, Lack of Remedy, Lack of Standing, Lawyers, Legal Cases, Legal Objections, Legal Remedies, Loss of Citizenship, Myths, Name change, Natural Born, Non-justiciable, Orly Taitz, Quo Warranto.
comments closed

C.        President elect’s Failures to Qualify

17.         By public evidence, President Elect, Obama had failed to qualify:


18.    A)     By allegiance to Britain at birth via his alien colonial father, irreparably negating his being a “natural born citizen”;

Comment: Begging the question. In fact, as several early court cases and common law history have shown, the fact that one or more parents has some allegiance to another country, does not mean that a child born on US soil has the same allegiance. In fact, under allegiance of, is a term commonly misconstrued when all it means is that the child has to obey the laws of the country. This was added to exclude children from diplomats, who are born under diplomatic immunity, and children of invading military.

(more…)

Orly – Camp Lejeune – The other side March 29, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Just Plain Weird, Lawyers, Media Update, News, Orly Taitz.
comments closed

The Reno Gazette Journal reports on a disturbing development which may help explain why some reports from Camp Lejeune and President’s Obama’s visit have made their rounds on the Internet. The rumors claim that Obama did not take part in the prayer nor the National Anthem. However, when contacted by a third party, the commander of Camp Lejeune called these claims to be untrue:

Back to the Reno Gazetter

JACKSONVILLE, N.C. – Less than three months into his term, President Barack Obama’s life allegedly has been threatened twice by people who swore an oath to obey his orders.

Pfc. Nicholas Daniel Hanke and Kody Brittingham, a former lance corporal who was separated from the Corps in early January, both face criminal charges stemming from recent threats authorities said the men made against the commander in chief.

Hanke, 20, a student at Marine Corps Engineer School, Camp Lejeune, N.C., was arrested March 10 for allegedly shouting threats, including one against Obama, after boarding a plane at Wilmington International Airport in Wilmington, N.C., about 50 miles south of Lejeune.

(more…)

2008-03-29 – Orly Taizt – James v Obama – Part 1 March 29, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Born in Kenya, Certification of Live Birth, Indonesian Passport, James v. Obama, Lack of Hospital records, Lawyers, Legal Remedies, Myths, Name change, Orly Taitz, Pakistan, Quo Warranto, Subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
comments closed

Comment: A fascinating collection of previously shown flawed claims, arguments and assertions. Not surprisingly they have still made it in the next filing of Orly. My prediction: As with Holder, the DOJ will ignore her and Orly will call for the resignation of yet another Federal Officer. This is a work in progress in which I intend to address all the claims made. As others, who are much more informed that I, have pointed out, Orly has filed a court case in DC without proper local representation. That’s going to be interesting to see. In addition, the document contains several spelling errors such as Vatall and errors of fact such as “fn. 192 Hollister v. Soetoro, 2d Cir. D.C. Cir. No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR, Motion to Dismiss Jan 26, 2009.”  Contrary to the citation “Hollister was neither in the Second Circuit nor the District of Columbia Circuit”, it was in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. Sloppy researcha and proof-reading.

1No. _______________
In The
United States District Court, District of Columbia

In re
ALLEN C. JAMES, US Army, active duty
RAYMOND REFITT, Commander, Submarine, US Navy
HARRY RILEY, Colonel, US Army, Silver Star Recipient
ALLEN C. JAMES, US Army, active duty in Iraq
CHARLES E. MILLER, Lt. Col. US Air Force
TIMOTHY KENNEY, Citadel Instructor, US Marine Corps veteran, Virginia Army National Guard
RALPH JENKINS, Capt. Marine Corps
ERIC SWAFFORD, State Representative from Tennessee
CYNTHIA DAVIS, State Representative from Missouri
LARRY RAPPAPORT, State Representative from New Hampshire
Petitioners/Relators
v.
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, a/k/a BARRY SOETORO, President, USA;
LINDA LINGLE, as Governor of the State of Hawai’i; &
HILLARY CLINTON, as Secretary of State, USA.
Respondents

Motion for Leave to File Writ of Quo Warranto on  Barack Hussein Obama II, President of the U.S.A., and Writs of Mandamus on Hawai’i Governor Linda Lingle, to provide evidence, and on Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to provide and request evidence from the  United Kingdom, and Republics of Kenya, Indonesia, and Pakistan.

(more…)

The Pacific Reporter – Elk v Wilkins March 28, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.
comments closed

Source:  The Pacific Reporter, By West Publishing Company, Published by West Pub. Co., 1917

The plaintiff’s place and time of birth, under this doctrine, makes him a citizen of the United States, unless the fact that he is of the Indian race, together with such tribal relations as he may have, place him in the class of persons who are not born within the “jurisdiction of the United States” or who are not “born * subject to the Jurisdiction thereof,” as it is expressed In the Fourteenth Amendment.

(more…)

2009-03-28 – Orly News March 28, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Lawyers, Media Update, News, Orly Taitz.
comments closed

Things do not seem to have gone too well for Orly. Although she announced with great fanfare that she was going to meet with Eric Holder, Senator Kyl, and Admiral Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the facts reveal that she failed miserably:

From Orly’s twitter feed:

  1. Please call justice dept and DEMAND immediate resignation of Eric Holder for failure to appt. spec.prosecutor to prosecute crimes by Obama
  2. Sent ltr to Chief Justice John Robts requesting that he resign immediately. Please call to DEMAND same!!

(more…)

Was Obama's Selective Services Registration form Doctored? March 27, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.
comments closed

And this comment at the FreeRepublic
I can report on an interesting developing controversy regarding President Obama’s Selective Service registration.

03-30-2009: HistorianDude provides us with an important update which indicates that the mystery SSS is likely the one to be ‘fake’. See the comment section.

Let’s go back in history.

Stephen Coffman tried to verify that President Obama had registered for the Selective Service, as required by law. When he initially tried to verify, he did not find any on-line references. However, after discussing with Janice L. Hughes from the SSS, he received confirmation that President Obama’s SSS document was on file, in compliance with Federal law. No date is given when this discussion took place.

(more…)

Exploring the meaning of "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" Part III March 26, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.
comments closed

Source: The American Decisions: Cases of General Value and Authority Decided in the Courts of Several States By John Proffatt, Abraham Clark Freeman, Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company Published by Bancroft-Whitney Co., 1911

Finally, the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

(more…)

Elk v Wilkins March 26, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Lawyers, Leo Donofrio.
comments closed

Source: A Selection of Cases on Constitutional Law, By Emlin McClain, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Published by Little, Brown and company, 1900

The decision in Elk v. Wilkins concerned only members of the Indian tribes within the United States, and had no tendency to deny citizenship to children born in the United States of foreign parents of Caucasian, African, or Mongolian descent, not in the diplomatic service of a foreign country.

(more…)

Translating Orly March 26, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Just Plain Weird, Lawyers, Orly Taitz.
comments closed

Yesterday, March 25, 2009, she pounded the pavement in DC. First stop was to William Chatfield’s office, Director of the Selective Service. Full account of that meeting can be read here.

From there she went to Senator Kyl’s office, Minority Whip and Senate Judiciary Committee. After that, it was off to the Pentagon.

At the Pentagon, she met with Captain Crowford (sp?) of Admiral Mullen’s office, Chief (sic) of the Joint Chief of Staff.

She went over all the material provided at the link above during her meetings with Senator Kyl’s and Admiral Mullen’s offices.

Comment: In other words, she did likely not meet with Senator Kyl nor Admiral Mullen. In fact, she only spoke to Captain Crowford, Legal Counsel for Admiral Mulllen. Can anyone confirm that her meeting with Senator Kyl was with staff only?

Comment: Why did Orly visit Kyl? Because he had the ‘audacity’ to respond as follows:

Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.: “Thank you for your recent e-mail. Senator Obama meets the constitutional requirements for presidential office. Rumors pertaining to his citizenship status have been circulating on the Internet, and this information has been debunked by Snopes.com, which investigates the truth behind Internet rumors.”

Orly Taitz – Being ignored by the Supreme Court… March 26, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Just Plain Weird, Lawyers, Legal Remedies, Orly Taitz, Quo Warranto, Stalking SCOTUS.
comments closed

Comment: This is what happens to Orly when she does not get what she wants… Funny stuff. First asking for recusal now asking for Roberts’ resignation. Don’t forget that I predicted much of this. Although I underestimated Orly’s response.

This is to remind you that on 03.13.09. I have presented you with the motion for reconsideration in Lightfoot v Bowen, Quo Warranto in Easterling et al v Obama et al and a 164 page dossier of suspected illegal and criminal activity surrounding Mr. Obama and his supporters, that was written on 03.01.09 and sent on Attorney general Holder on 03.03.09. In front of 1200 students and faculty of the University of Moscow, Idaho you agreed to review those documents. This is a matter of National Security and National urgency and as of yet there was no response from you or Attorney General Holder, nor Robert Mueller, Director of FBI, that was copied on this dossier.

Comment: Did Roberts claim he would review the documents? I thought he said something along the lines of “I will have a look at them”?

(more…)

Orly Taitz – Selective Services Registration March 25, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Uncategorized.
comments closed

Some poorly argued claims were presented by Orly Taitz to the National Director of the Selective Service, William Chatfield

Today, on 03.25.09. at 10:15 I have met with the National director of the Selective Service William Chatfield in his office at 1515 Wilson Blvd, ste 600 in Arlington VA.

I have presented to Mr. Chatfield a report by the retired Federal Agent Steven Coffman, showing that Barack Obama’s Certification for Selective Service has numerous signs of forgery. Mr. Chatfield provided no explanation to the findings.
I have asked, what is the explanation to the fact that the serial number on the top right of the page, that usually shows the year, showed 08, meaning that it was created in 2008 and under the card an 8 was added before the number to make it look 80, as if it was issued in 1980. According to agent Coffman it was forged to backdate it, to look as if it was issued in 1980. Mr. Chatfield had no explanation.
Similarly I have questioned him about the wrong stamp, wrong form number and wrong dates (see the report in dossier #1).
No answer and no information was provided.

Let’s look in more detail at the forms and the so-called ‘numerous signs of forgery’

(more…)

Donofrio – Damage Control March 25, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Lawyers, Leo Donofrio, Orly Taitz.
comments closed

March 13, 2009

United States Attorney Jeffrey Taylor
United States Attorney’s Office
555 4th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20530

Dear Mr. Taylor,

I am writing to make you aware of a brewing danger to members of our active military who have been influenced to join law suits challenging the eligibility of President Barack Obama as Commander In Chief.  I hope you will deem it proper to take appropriate action to protect our military and the nation from further damage.

(more…)

Magaret Hemenway – Did the judge seek to fine and sanction my father-in-law for seeking the truth? March 24, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Just Plain Weird, News.
comments closed

Exclusive: Fined and Sanctioned for Seeking Truth about Obama’s Eligibility?

Margaret Calhoun Hemenway

John D. Hemenway, Esq., filed yesterday, Monday, March 16th, in U.S. District Court, his mandated reply by court order in the ongoing lawsuit to determine Barack Hussein Obama’s (aka Barry Soetoro) eligibility to serve as President of the United States. The Judge, James Robertson, a Clinton appointee, ordered the response to his dismissal of the lawsuit, and threat to impose sanctions on Mr. Hemenway, to be submitted within a scant 11 days.

(more…)

House Call – Writing Letters to the Judge March 24, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Just Plain Weird.
comments closed

Source: Washington Times

HOUSE CALL

Jesse H. Merrell, who lives on Garfield Street Northwest, tells Inside the Beltway that a pair of deputy U.S. marshals paid him a visit last Friday after he had written a letter to U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson regarding President Obama’s citizenship controversy.

(more…)

2009-03-24 – Hollister v Soetoro – Rule 11 violations but no sanctions March 24, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Hollister v Soetoro, Legal Cases.
comments closed

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

GREGORY S. HOLLISTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARRY SOETORO,
et
al.,
Defendants.

Civil Action No. 08-2254 (JR)

MEMORANDUM ORDER

(more…)

Huffington Post – WorldNetDaily and Obama Birth Certificate: Evasive Answers to Simple Questions March 24, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Certification of Live Birth, Lawyers, Myths, News, Orly Taitz.
comments closed

At the Huffington Post, Terry Krepel writes on the ‘controversy’ created by WorldNetDaily noting how in 2008, WorldNetDaily’s own investigation had debunked the conspiracy around Obama’s Certification of Live Birth:

Before WorldNetDaily decided its mission was to stake what little journalistic reputation it has left on a desperate campaign to bring down Barack Obama by becoming an echo chamber for fringe claims that he may not have been born in the United States, it debunked the idea in August 2008, claiming not only that Philip Berg’s lawsuit making that claim, in part, “relies on discredited claims” but that “[a] separate WND investigation into Obama’s birth certificate utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic.” WND — and especially editor Joseph Farah — has been pretending ever since that it never did this story, unable to admit the simple truth of its existence and grotesquely contorting itself into writing around it.

(more…)

Music Video – Lily Allen – Dreams Or Change March 23, 2009

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Music Video, News, Uncategorized.
comments closed